UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the RegistrantFiled by a party other than the Registrant

CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX:
Preliminary Proxy Statement.Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)).
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Proxy Statement.Additional Materials
Definitive Additional Materials.
Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12.under §240.14a-12



GREEN PLAINS INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in itsIn Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):


PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY):
No fee required
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11




01_492139-1_cover_front.jpg



01_429139-1_cover_all.jpg


1
Letter from our Board of Directors
Dear Shareholders:
It is my honor to pen this letter to you, as your new Chairman of the Board. I know I speak on behalf of all members of the Board of Directors when I thank past chairman Wayne Hoovestol for his years of commitment to Green Plains and its shareholders.
I am eager to continue the legacy of strong leadership, working alongside dedicated Green Plains employees as they continue to drive toward success through an intensive company transformation into an ag-tech innovator creating sustainable ingredients that matter.
In 2023, we forged new partnerships and enhanced existing ones, navigated challenging markets, and celebrated several successes. We made progress in several areas of environmental stewardship and responsible business, focusing on the planet and people, and continued to enhance transparency and disclosure in our 2023 Sustainability Report.
As we move forward in 2024, Green Plains remains committed to its transformation into the biorefinery platform of the future, making more with less while helping to reduce the world’s carbon emissions. We cannot accomplish our goals without our employees, customers, shareholders, and communities. Thank you for your support.


Sincerely,
sig.andersonJ.jpg
James D. Anderson
The Board of Directors
“As we move forward in 2024, Green Plains remains committed to its transformation into the biorefinery platform of the future, making more with less while helping to reduce the world’s carbon emissions.”


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
2
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO

2018 ANNUAL MEETING

OF SHAREHOLDERS

AND PROXY STATEMENT


LOGO

March 29, 2018

Dear Shareholder,

You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Green Plains Inc. to be held at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, on Wednesday, May 9, 2018, at the Omaha Marriott Downtown at the Capital District located at 222 N 10th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102.

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders Proxy Statement containing information about matters to be acted upon, Proxy Card and 2017 Annual Report are enclosed.

Please use this opportunity to take part in the affairs of your company. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, please complete, date, sign and return the accompanying Proxy Card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or vote via the Internet or telephone. Please refer to the Proxy Card for instructions on voting via the Internet or telephone or, if your shares are registered in the name of a broker or bank, please refer to the information forwarded by the broker or bank to determine if Internet or telephone voting is available to you. If you attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, you may revoke the proxy and vote in person.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we appreciate your continued interest in your company.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Wayne Hoovestol

Chairman of the Board of Directors


LOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

to be held on May 9, 2018

The 2018 Annual Meeting of Green Plains Inc. will be held at 10:00 a.m., Central time, on Wednesday, May 9, 2018, at the Omaha Marriott Downtown at the Capital District located at 222 N 10th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, for the following purposes:

DATE AND TIME
10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday,
May 7, 2024
LOCATION
www.meetnow.global/MNVQDLQ
RECORD DATE
March 13, 2024
1.Items of Business
Proposals
Board Vote
Recommendation
For Further
Details
1.To elect foursix directors to serve three-yearone-year terms that expire at the 20212025 annual meeting;meeting
Vote FORall nominees
u Page 14

2.To ratify the selection of KPMG as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2024
2.
Vote FOR
u Page 36
3.To cast an advisory vote to approve the company’sCompany’s executive compensation; andcompensation
Vote FOR
u Page 42

3.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “For” all nominees in Proposal 1 and a vote “For” Proposal 2.

The foregoing items are more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. We have fixed the close of business on March 15, 2018, as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. Each share of our Common Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters presented at the Annual Meeting. Dissenters’ rights are not applicable to these matters.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for Shareholder Meeting to be held on May 9, 2018. Pursuant to rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials by notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet. Instead of mailing paper copies of our proxy materials, we sent shareholders the Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on May 9, 2018, with instructions for accessing the proxy materials and voting via the Internet (the “Notice”). The Notice, which was mailed on or around March 29, 2018, also provides information on how shareholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose.The Notice, the Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report may be accessed atwww.edocumentview.com/GPRE.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, WE URGE YOU TO VOTE YOUR SHARES VIA THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER OR OVER THE INTERNET, AS PROVIDED IN THE ENCLOSED MATERIALS. IF YOU REQUESTED A PROXY CARD BY MAIL, YOU MAY SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Michelle Mapes

Corporate Secretary

Omaha, Nebraska

March 29, 2018


LOGO

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COMMONLY USED DEFINED TERMS

1

PROXY SUMMARY

How To Vote
Whether or not you expect to attend the annual meeting online, we urge you to vote your shares via the following:
INTERNET
Go to: www.envisionreports.com/GPRE
PHONE
Call our toll-free telephone number 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US Territories and Canada
MAIL
Sign, date and mail the proxy card in the envelope provided.
2

PROXY STATEMENT

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

7

Independent Directors

7

Meetings

pg2_sig.michelle-mapes.jpg


3
Table of Contents


REPORT4

GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

47

OTHER MATTERS

48

Annual Report

48

Shareholder Proposals

48

Discretionary Authority

49SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT


COMMONLY USED DEFINED TERMS

CompanySafe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements in this Proxy Statement that are not historical, including statements concerning plans and Regulatory Defined Terms:

objectives of management for future operations, economic performance or related assumptions, are forward-looking statements made in accordance with safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “plan,” “predict,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will” and similar expressions, as well as statements regarding future operating or financial performance or guidance, business strategy, environment, key trends and benefits of actual or planned acquisitions. We believe our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable assumptions; however, these assumptions may not be accurate or account for all risks and uncertainties. Consequently, forward-looking statements are not guaranteed. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are described under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, and Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain statements contained in this Proxy Statement, particularly pertaining to our ongoing transformation into the biorefinery platform as well as sustainability performance, goals, and initiatives, are subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including regarding gathering and verification of information and related methodological considerations; our ability to implement various initiatives under expected timeframes, cost, and complexity; our dependency on third-parties to provide certain information and to comply with applicable laws and policies; and other unforeseen events or conditions. These factors, as well as others, may cause results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We will not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, except as required under applicable law.
Web Links
Web links throughout this document are provided for convenience only, and information on the company's website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.


Green Plains; the company; GPIGreen Plains Inc.
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Fleischmann’s Vinegar; Fleischmann’s; FVCFleischmann’s Vinegar Company, Inc.
GPPGreen Plains Partners LP
NASDAQThe Nasdaq Global Market
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
Other Defined Terms:
Annual MeetingThe 2018 Annual Meeting of shareholders of Green Plains Inc. and any adjournment or postponement thereof
ASC 718Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation
BoardBoard of Directors of Green Plains Inc.
Common StockGreen Plains Inc. Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
EBITDAEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization which is anon-GAAP measure. See our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for a reconciliation to GAAP net income
ESGEnvironmental, social and governance
GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GICSGlobal Industry Classification Standard
GPPGreen Plains Partners LP
Internal Revenue CodeInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
LTIPLong-Term Incentive Plan
NEONamed executive officer
NoticeImportant notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting
PSUPerformance Share Unit
Record DateThe record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
TSRTotal Shareholder Return
Umbrella STIPGreen Plains Inc. Umbrella Short-Term Incentive Plan
U.S.United States5

PROXY SUMMARY

Proxy Statement

This Proxy Statement is provided to the shareholders of Green Plains Inc. in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) to be voted at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, online at www.meetnow.global/MNVQDLQ on Tuesday, May 7, 2024, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).
Proxy Summary
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in deciding how to vote. You should read the Proxy Statement carefully before voting. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy is first being sent or made available to shareholders on or around March 29, 2018.

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Time and Date:

10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time, Wednesday, May 9, 2018

Place:

Omaha Marriott Downtown at the Capital District

222 N 10th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102

Record Date:March 15, 2018

VOTING INFORMATION

Who is Eligible to Vote

You are entitled to vote at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders if you were a shareholder of record as of the Record Date, which has been fixed as of close of business on March 15, 2018. On the Record Date, there were 40,931,456 shares of our company’s Common Stock outstanding and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

The presence, in person or by properly executed proxy, at the Annual Meeting of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum. Proxies that are marked to “withhold authority” with respect to the election of directors and proxies for which no instructions are given will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

Electronic Access to Proxy Materials

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we are making this Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report available to shareholders electronically via the Internet. On or around March 29, 2018, we mailed the Notice, which provides information regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, to our shareholders of record.

Shareholders will be able to access this Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive printed copies of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. The website on which you will be able to view our proxy materials also allows you to choose to receive future proxy materials electronically by email, which would save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you. If you choose to receive future proxy statements by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email remains in effect until you terminate it.

HOW YOU CAN ACCESS THE PROXY MATERIALS ONLINE

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 9, 2018.

The Notice, the Proxy and our 2017 Annual Report may be accessed at

www.edocumentview.com/GPRE.

MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

About Our Company
Transformation. It’s what we do every day when we convert a kernel of corn into sustainable products to help meet the global demand for high-value feed ingredients and low-carbon fuel. We are amid a broader transformation extracting even more low-carbon ingredients from the same annually renewable crops. Our suite of proprietary technologies makes our broad transformation possible. We are leading the way in producing sustainable ingredients to meet the demands of a growing world.
Our transformation includes deploying our patented, world-class mechanical and process technology at each of our locations to develop nutritious, valuable ingredients that make a positive global impact.
We are focused on reducing our operating expenses, expanding our ability to isolate the highest-value proteins for use in feed ingredients in pet, aquaculture and other high-value markets to meet global demand, converting a portion of the starch into low-carbon intensity dextrose—all while capturing more renewable corn oil from each kernel to serve as a feedstock for the rapidly expanding renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel markets.
We have committed our seven biorefineries in Nebraska, Iowa, and Minnesota to carbon capture and sequestration projects. These projects will lower greenhouse gas emissions through the capture of biogenic carbon dioxide at each of these biorefineries, significantly lowering their carbon intensity.

 PROPOSAL

BOARD
RECOMMENDATION

PAGE

  1. The election of four directors to serve three-year terms that expire at the 2021 annual meeting (“Proposal 1”)

FOR

11

  2. An advisory vote to approve executive compensation (“Proposal 2”)

FOR

45

Proxy Voting and Revocability of Proxies

Common Stock, represented by the proxies received pursuant to this solicitation and not timely revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated in properly submitted proxies. If no instructions are indicated, such shares will be voted as recommended by the Board. If any other matters are properly presented to the Annual Meeting for action, the person(s) named in the enclosed form(s) of proxy and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. Brokernon-votes and abstentions are not treated as votes cast for any of the matters to be voted on at the meeting.

A holder of Common Stock who has submitted a proxy may revoke it prior to its exercise by providing written notice of revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Corporate Secretary of the company at any time before the closing of the polls at the meeting, or by voting in person at the meeting. Any written notice revoking a proxy should be sent to: Green Plains Inc., Attention: Michelle S. Mapes, Corporate Secretary, 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. Attendance in person at the Annual Meeting does not itself revoke a proxy; however, any shareholder who attends the Annual Meeting may revoke a previously submitted proxy by voting in person.

Computershare Trust Company N.A. is the transfer agent and registrar for our Common Stock. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, with respect to those shares, you are considered the shareholder of record, or a registered shareholder, and these materials were sent to you directly by us. If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and that organization should have forwarded these materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee holding your shares how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Please refer to the information forwarded by your broker or bank for instructions on how to direct their vote. However, since you are not a shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the shareholder of record.

If you are a registered shareholder, there are four ways to vote:

going to the Internet website indicated on the Proxy Card or voting instruction card and following the instructions provided (you will need the control number that is included in the Notice);Highlights
calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on the Proxy Card or voting instruction card (you will need the control number that is included in the Notice);
signing, dating and returning the Proxy Card if you request to receive your proxy materials by mail; or
written ballot in person at the Annual Meeting.

Your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate your voting preferences, the appointed proxies will vote your shares “For” all nominees in Proposal 1, and “For” Proposal 2.

BrokerNon-Votes

Brokernon-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks holding shares on behalf of the beneficial owners, are prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions at least ten days before the Annual Meeting date. If no instructions are given within that time frame, the nominees may vote those shares on matters deemed “routine” by the New York Stock Exchange. Onnon-routine matters, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting inso-called “brokernon-votes.” Brokernon-votes are not counted for the purposes of determining the number of shares present in person or represented by proxy on any voting matter. All proposals are considerednon-routine.

Expenses and Methods of Solicitation

We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. In addition to the use of the mail and Internet, proxies may be solicited personally, or by telephone or other means of communications, by directors, officers and employees of the company and its subsidiaries who will not receive additional compensation therefor. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and nominees for reasonable expenses incurred related to forwarding proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares held by such banks, brokerage firms and nominees.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of the Common Stock, assuming a quorum is present, is required to elect each director. The four persons receiving the greatest number of votes at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as directors. Since only affirmative votes count for this purpose, brokernon-votes or votes withheld will not affect the outcome of the voting on Proposal 1. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the holders of the Common Stock, assuming a quorum is present is required to approve Proposal 2. Since only votes cast count for this purpose, brokernon-votes and abstentions will not affect the outcome of the voting on Proposal 2.

BOARD HIGHLIGHTS

Our current directors whose terms are expiring have been nominated by the Board for reelection at the Annual Meeting. For more information on all of the director nominees, see page 12 of this Proxy Statement.

COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS

Our company is a vertically integrated commodity processing company and North America’s second largest consolidated owner of ethanol plants. The companyCompany operates fourthree business segments: (1) ethanol production, which includes the production of ethanol, distillers grains, Ultra-High Protein and renewable corn oil, (2) agribusiness and energy services, which includes grain handling and storage, andcommodity marketing and merchant trading for company-produced and third-party ethanol, distillers grains, renewable corn oil, natural gas and other commodities, (3) food and ingredients, which includes cattle feeding, vinegar production and food-grade corn oil operations, and (4)(3) partnership, which includes fuel storage and transportation services.

2017 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Fiscal 2017 presented



6
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Transforming into the Biorefinery Platform of the Future
Green Plains is transforming from a challenging operating environment,traditional dry-mill ethanol producer into a sustainable biorefinery platform, innovating through ag-technology to produce higher-value products with stable cash flows, for tomorrow’s sustainable economy.
Investments in critical technology, infrastructure and strategic partnerships are driving progress to accelerate the transformation into the Biorefinery Platform of the Future.
GREEN PLAINS 1.0TRANSFORMATIONGREEN PLAINS 2.0
06_429139-1_logo_fluid-quip-technologies.jpg
Biorefinery Platform
Ethanol
DDGs
Corn Oil
Strategic Partnerships
MSCTM Technology
Creates Ultra-High Protein and enhances Corn Oil yields
Clean Sugar Technology™
Ultra-High Protein
DDGs
Ethanol
Carbon Capture
Renewable Corn Oil
Dextrose
Strategic Growth Areas
Verticals positioned to capitalize on rapidly growing demand.
Image_11.jpg
Sustainable
Ultra-High Protein
Sustainable ingredients for high-value global markets in pet, aquaculture, dairy and poultry industries as demand for higher quality animal feed grows.
Image_12.jpg
Renewable Corn Oil
Responsible low-carbon feedstock for the high-growth renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel industries.
Image_13.jpg
Carbon Capture & Sequestration
Participating in large scale CCS projects to further reduce the carbon intensity of our biofuels and ingredients.
Image_14.jpg
Clean Sugar Technology
Low-carbon dextrose for a variety of biochemical, bioplastics, synthetic biology and food industries.


PROXY SUMMARY7
2023 Performance Highlights
Green Plains made significant progress across all aspects of our business experiencedtransformation in 2023, continuing the impactsdevelopment of 60% protein sales; deploying the first-of-its-kind commercial-scale dry mill Clean Sugar Technology™ facility at Green Plains Shenandoah to begin commissioning during the first quarter of 2024; reaching record yields of renewable corn oil; diversifying our decarbonization strategy alternatives by committing our three Nebraska, four Iowa and Minnesota facilities to carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects; and starting development of a continued deflationary cycle withinnovel Sustainable Aviation Fuel technology through a joint venture, Blue Blade Energy, with United Airlines and Tallgrass.
Through these accomplishments and many others from 2023, we continue the agriculture sectortransition into a sustainable, value-added ingredient producer that is less reliant on volatile commodities markets. We are expanding production of our high-value ingredients, attracting new partners and continued pricing pressure from increased global suppliesentering new markets.
Through our investments in innovation and technology, we are pursuing novel pathways to value creation for our shareholders, with a focus on managing risk and generating stable operating margins. We own and operate assets throughout the ethanol value chain: upstream, with grain handling and storage; through our ethanol production facilities; and downstream, with marketing and distribution services to reduce uncertainties.

Achievements
Began development of a novel Sustainable Aviation Fuel technology through a joint venture, Blue Blade Energy, with United Airlines and Tallgrass;
Successfully completed full scale 60% protein production runs using Fluid Quip Technologies’ MSC™ system combined with biological solutions;
Achieved record renewable corn oil yield across our platform;
First-ever commercial deployment of Clean Sugar Technology™ at Green Plains Shenandoah to begin commissioning during the first quarter of 2024;
Diversification of decarbonization strategy, with three Nebraska facilities committed to CCS anticipated to become operational in 2025, four Iowa and Minnesota facilities anticipated to be operational in 2026 on a separate CCS system;
Expanded protein sales to customers in North America, South America and Asia Pacific across multiple species;
Announced technology collaboration with Equilon Enterprises LLC to deploy Shell Fiber Conversion Technology; and
Completed acquisition of Green Plains Partners LP on January 9, 2024, with most of the efforts taking place during 2023.


8
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Board Highlights
Our Board of grains, proteins and oilseeds. As a result, and primarily due to weak ethanol margins, we did not achieve the EBITDA goal under our short-term incentive plan and our 2017 bonus payouts, for the NEOs that were employed for the entire year, ranged from 43% to 57% of each NEO’s target bonus.

Despite these challenging operating conditions, we continued to execute on our business strategies by managing commodity price risks, improving operational efficiencies and optimizing market opportunities to create an efficient platform with diversified income streams, as exemplified by the following:

Key Operating Accomplishments

Directors
Director
Since
Committee
Membership
Name and Primary OccupationAgeACCCNGC
Director Nominees
pg7-photo_anderson.j.jpg 
JAMES D. ANDERSON pg7_graphic.independent-lightblue.jpg
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer, Molycop
662008
pg7_graphic.jpg
pg7-photo_becker.d.jpg 
TODD A. BECKER
President and Chief Executive Officer, Green Plains Inc.
582009
pg7-photo_knudsen.e.jpg 
EJNAR A. KNUDSEN III pg7_graphic.independent-lightblue.jpg
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, AGR Partners
552016
pg7-photo_peterson.b.jpg 
BRIAN PETERSON pg7_graphic.independent-lightblue.jpg
President and Chief Executive Officer, Whiskey Creek Enterprises
602005
pg7_graphic.chair-lightblue.jpg
 05_429139-1_photo_treuerA.jpg
ALAIN TREUER pg7_graphic.independent-lightblue.jpg
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Tellac Reuert Partners and Chairman, Local Ocean France
512008
pg7_graphic.jpg
pg7_graphic.jpg
pg7-photo_wanger.k.jpg 
KIMBERLY WAGNER pg7_graphic.independent-lightblue.jpg
Founder, TBGD Partners
602020
pg7_graphic.jpg
pg7_graphic.chair-lightblue.jpg
Continuing Directors with Terms Expiring in 2025
pg7_aslam.jpg 
FARHA ASLAM pg7_graphic.independent-darkblue.jpg
Managing Partner, Crescent House Capital
552021
pg7_graphic.member-darkblue.jpg

pg7-photo_salinas.m.jpg 
MARTIN SALINAS JR. pg7_graphic.independent-darkblue.jpg
Former Chief Financial Officer, Energy Transfer Partners, LP
522021
pg7_graphic.chair-darkblue.jpg
pg7_graphic.member-darkblue.jpg
INDIndependent Director
Chair
Image_39.jpg
Net income of $61.1 million, or $1.47 per diluted share.Member
Image_40.jpg
ACAudit Committee
CCCompensation Committee
NGCNominating and Governance Committee



PROXY SUMMARY9
Board Snapshot
INDEPENDENCEProduced 1.3 billion gallonsAGEDIRECTOR TENUREDIVERSITY
88%
independent
57
years average
10.1
years average
38%
diverse
04_429139-3_gfx_boardsnapshots_independence.jpg
04_429139-3_gfx_boardsnapshots_age.jpg
04_429139-3_gfx_boardsnapshots_directortenure.jpg
Image_44.jpg
2/3
committee chairs are diverse
SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Image_45.jpg
EXECUTIVE
LEADERSHIP
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_executive leadership.jpg
Image_47.jpg
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
04_429139-3_gfx_charts_skills&experience_capital markets.jpg
Image_49.jpg
PUBLIC
COMPANY /CORP
GOVERNANCE/
ESG
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_industrial mfg.jpg
Image_51.jpg
MERGERS &
ACQUISITIONS
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_industrial mfg.jpg
Image_53.jpg
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_executive compensation.jpg
Image_55.jpg
CAPITAL
MARKETS
04_429139-3_gfx_charts_skills&experience_capital markets.jpg
Image_57.jpg
INDUSTRIAL MFG
& INGREDIENT
PROD
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_industrial mfg.jpg
02_429139-1_icon_audit_.jpg
AUDIT/RISK/
CYBERSECURITY
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_audit.jpg
Image_61.jpg
COMMODITY
MARKETS/
MARKETING
04_429139-3_gfx_charts_skills&experience_commodity markets.jpg
Image_63.jpg
LEGAL/
REGULATORY
GOVERNMENT
RELATIONS
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_graphic-government relation.jpg
Image_64.jpg
STRATEGY
DEVELOPMENT
04_429139-3_gfx_skills&experience_strategy development.jpg


10
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Key Skills &
Experiences
Description of Skills and Explanation of Importance
pg9_icon-executiveleadership.ai.jpg
Executive
Leadership
One of the core considerations of our Board in examining director candidates is that the director should have an established track record of professional accomplishment in the candidate’s chosen field. It is important we have highly qualified directors with a diverse range of complementary skill sets, but the common thread is that our directors have experience leading large, complex organizations and teams. Green Plains is a company with an array of important stakeholders, including employees, stockholders, customers, partners, regulators, and communities. It is important for our Board to have directors who have experience dealing with a similar range of stakeholders and managing the challenges associated with operating a large organization.
pg9_icon-corporategovernance.ai.jpg
Public
Company/
Corporate
Governance/
ESG
Our Board is responsible for overseeing the successful execution of our strategy and the selection and retention of key executives, which affects the fundamental operation of the Company. It is important for our Board to have directors who understand the fiduciary obligations of public company directors and who have experience shaping a company’s priorities and structure. Effective corporate governance, ongoing board refreshment and a commitment to diversity are all part of a broader effort to ensure that ESG considerations and goals are incorporated into the company’s corporate strategy. Also, the implementation of leading ESG practices is a very important component of our business as the effects of global climate change continues to attract considerable attention with widespread concerns about the impacts of human activity, especially the emissions of greenhouse gases.
pg9_icon-compensation.jpg
Executive
Compensation
The Board believes that aligning executive compensation with shareholder interests is consistent with the Company’s philosophy of driving performance and building long-term shareholder value. This pay-for-performance philosophy is embraced by the Board and is intended to align the interests of key executives, attract and retain high-performing employees, and link a significant amount of compensation to the achievement of pre-established performance metrics directly tied to our business goals and strategies. It is important for Green Plains to have board members who have participated in the design and supervision of executive compensation programs.
pg9_icon-riskmanagement.jpg
Industrial
Manufacturing
& Ingredient
Production
Green Plains has grown to be one of the leading corn processors in the world for low-carbon products at our biorefineries, inclusive of ethanol, renewable corn oil, Ultra-High Protein, and distillers grains as our core sources of revenue. We operate 10 biorefineries located in six states. It is important for our Board to have a 9.5% increase over 2016.deep understanding of industrial manufacturing, the biorefinery and the proprietary and patented protein production processes, as well as potential future technologies applicable to our biorefineries.
pg9 & 31_icon_governance.ai.jpg
Commodity
Markets/
Marketing
Green Plains procures grain and natural gas to produce our products and markets, sells and distributes our products, e.g., ethanol, distillers grains, Ultra-High Protein, and renewable corn oil produced at our biorefineries. A strong understanding of commodity markets is essential as well as an understanding of U.S. and global markets impacting supply and demand characteristics.


PROXY SUMMARY11

pg10_icon-strategydevelopment.jpg
Strategy
Development
EBITDA of $154.4 million (see EBITDA reconciliation
We believe that we can maximize our competitive advantage to create lasting value for our stockholders, both in the company’s Form10-K, filed February 14, 2018).near and longer-term, by successfully executing on our strategic plan, to take advantage of the world’s growing demand for protein feed ingredients. It is important for our Board to have directors who have experience developing, delivering and directing corporate strategy. Further, it is important to have board members who have experience transforming organizations and culture and improving processes, services, and products with an aim of enhancing long-term value.

pg10_icon-internationalbusines.jpg
International
Business
Global competition, international trade and product-related policies, and international activities can have a significant impact on our business.
pg10_icon-mergeacquisition.jpg
Mergers &
Acquisitions /
Partnerships
With weaker ethanol margins during fiscal year 2017, we
Joint ventures, partnerships, mergers and acquisitions are an important part of maintaining a competitive advantage by maximizing our production capabilities, leveraging our proprietary technology and expanding new products into fast-growing, higher margin markets. We intend to continue exploring potential growth opportunities and strategies through these disciplines. As such, it is important to have board members well-versed in M&A-related activities to ensure that the right opportunities are being pursued, operational and financial risks can be quantified and effectively managed while expected synergies and growth projections are reasonable and realistic.
pg10_icon-capitalmarkets.jpg
Capital
Markets
As our company continues to transform, having expertise in capital markets and various equity and debt financing alternatives will continue to managebe a critical skill set for our ethanol productionBoard to ensure we have the optimal capital structure, and financing needed to support these efforts.
pg10_icon-audit.jpg
Audit/Risk/
Cybersecurity
As a public company, we are subject to various auditing, accounting, and financial reporting obligations. Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing the Company’s financial statements, financial reporting, and internal controls, as well poised as both domesticoverseeing the independent auditor and global demand continuescybersecurity. Green Plains is also subject to rise.various forms of risk, including, without limitation, cybersecurity risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, legal and compliance risk and reputational risk. It is important for our Board to have directors who are financial experts and who understand financial reporting as well as effective risk management practices.

Growth Achievements

pg10_icon-govtrelation.jpg
Legal/
Regulatory/
Government
Relations
Completed acquisitions of cattle-feed
Our operations located in Hereford, Texas, Leoti, Kansas and Eckley, Colorado bringing the company’s total capacityare regulated by various government entities that can impose significant costs on our business. It is important to 258,000 head of cattle and making us the 4th largest feedlot operator in the U.S.

Along with our joint-venture partner, Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Partner’s, commenced commercial operations at the intermodal export and import fuels terminal in Beaumont, Texas.

Entered intohave board members who have a $500 million term loan agreement, which matures on August 29, 2023, to refinance $405 million of existing debt.

Repurchased $6.7 millionstrong comprehension of the company’s Common Stock pursuantlegal and regulatory landscape specific to our stock repurchase program.business. Our production levels, markets and grain we procure are affected by federal government programs. Government policies such as tariffs, duties, subsidies, import and export restrictions and embargoes can also impact our business.


12
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Philosophy.

Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay that reflects corporate, business unit and individual performance that also aligns with the creation of long-term value for our shareholders. As part of our compensation philosophy we pay executive salaries that are lower than our competitors, with more compensation“at-risk” through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive awards. Our annual cash incentive plan provides an incentive to achieve financial and operational performance aligned with our business plan and longer term strategy.

The following chart illustrates the mix of total direct compensation elements for our NEO’s at target performance, excluding our former Chief Financial Officer who retired during fiscal 2017.

LOGO

Pay for Performance.   Our Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay in alignment with corporate and individual performance, aligned with our strategy of growing ethanol andnon-ethanol EBITDA, while operating safely and delivering an appropriate level of return to our shareholders.

Performance againstpre-established EBITDA goals is a key element of our annual incentive plan. Historically, we have used key acquisitions to transform our platform and build future value through continued vertical integration. As the chart on page 20 indicates, our CEO’s total realizable compensation is well-aligned with our company and stock price performance.

Our Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program effectively aligns executive pay with performance returns to shareholders and creates a growth-oriented, long-term value proposition for our shareholders. For more information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Overview – Pay for Performance” included in the Proxy Statement.

Response to Say On Pay Vote and Changes to our Executive Compensation Program.   At our 2017 annual meeting, our shareholders approved our NEOs’ compensation, with approximately 76% of the votes cast in favor of our say on pay proposal.

The committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, considered the 2017 vote results, shareholder input and current market practices as it evaluated whether changes to the compensation program were warranted for 2018.

Based on shareholder input and to better align our compensation programs with our strategy and market practice, we implemented the following changes for 2018:

We transitioned our long-term incentive program to a forward looking program, with awards contingent on future performance;

Beginning in 2018, one half of awards to executive officers under the LTIP will be in the form of performance share units (PSUs) which vest based 12 on total shareholder return relative to a performance peer group and 12 based on return on net assets;

We have adjusted our Chief Executive Officer’s salary and target annual incentive for 2018 to align more closely with market norms, increasing salary, but maintaining a salary below market median and decreasing his target annual incentive to 200% of salary, to maintain his target cash compensation at the same level as in 2017;

We adopted a compensation recovery (clawback) policy to all the Board to recoup incentive compensation in appropriate circumstances;

We have eliminated the excise tax gross up provision in our Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement; and

The Compensation Committee retained an independent compensation advisor to provide advice in connection with our executive compensation program and incentive plan design.

The Compensation Committee believes these changes will strengthen alignment between executive compensation and the interests of our shareholders, and support the achievement of our strategic and financial goals. For a more detailed discussion of these changes, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 16 of this Proxy Statement.

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Our companyCompany has a history of strong corporate governance. By evolving our governance approach in light ofconsidering best practices, our Board drives sustained shareholder value and best serves the interests of our shareholders.

Image_77.jpg
What We Do
Image_78.jpg
What We Don’t Do

            WHAT WE DO         WHAT WE DON’T DO

pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  100% independent board committees

Ï   No poison pill

pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  100% directors owning stock

pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Compensation recoupment (clawback) policy
pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Right to call special meeting threshold set at 20%
pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Provide a majority of executive compensation in performance-based compensation
pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Pay for performance based on measurable goals for both annual and long-term awards
pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Balanced mix of awards tied to annual and long-term performance
pg11_graphic_whatwedocheck.ai.jpg  Stock ownership and retention policy

Ï

pg11_graphic_whatwedon'tdocross.ai.jpg  No poison pills
pg11_graphic_whatwedon'tdocross.ai.jpg  No supplemental executive retirement plans

       Compensation recoupment (clawback) policy

Ï

pg11_graphic_whatwedon'tdocross.ai.jpg  No discounted stock options, reload of stock options or stock optionre-pricing without shareholder approval

       Right to call special meeting threshold set at 10%

Ï

pg11_graphic_whatwedon'tdocross.ai.jpg  No single-trigger vesting of equity compensation upon a change in control

       Provide a majority of executive compensation in performance-based compensation

Ï

pg11_graphic_whatwedon'tdocross.ai.jpg  No short-term trading, short sales, transactions involving derivatives, hedging or pledging transactions for executive officers

and directors
Corporate Governance Improvements
2020
Appointed diverse director
2021
Appointed two additional diverse directors
Appointed Lead Independent Director
Published governance guidelines with independent executive sessions
Reviewed broadening scope for cyber and ESG oversight by annual charter
Updated bylaws for proxy access and majority voting standard
Lowered threshold for special meeting to 20%
Rotated Committee chairs with two of the three Committee chairs diverse
Proposed reduction of the board from nine to eight members by no later than the 2023 annual meeting
2022
Recommended and declassified the board of directors
2023
Appointed Independent Chairman of the Board to replace the Lead Independent Director position
Downsized to eight directors, fulfilling commitment made to investors in 2021


PROXY SUMMARY13
Environmental Stewardship and Social Responsibility Highlights
Green Plains has transformed our business model to deliver on the rapidly expanding opportunities and crucial benefits of the emerging bioeconomy. We develop and increase renewable processes and products across our sustainable ingredients portfolio, and continue to enrich our social and governance foundations, in order to innovate solutions for a far-reaching set of stakeholders and our shared natural environment. Below are some highlights reflecting the impact we have in Environmental Stewardship and Social Responsibility.
Environmental Stewardship
As an ag-tech innovator of sustainable ingredients that matter, Green Plains is dedicated to preserving the health of our planet for current and future generations.
Notable 2023 achievements in this area included:
Leveraged innovative technologies and partnerships to further decarbonize our platform.
Made significant progress in goals related to energy efficiency, water management and sustainable sourcing.
Diversification of decarbonization strategy, with three Nebraska facilities committed to CCS anticipated to become operational in 2025, four Iowa and Minnesota facilities anticipated to be operational in 2026 on a separate CCS system.
Achieved record renewable corn oil yield across our platform.

       Pay for performance based

Social Responsibility
Green Plains recognizes the value of all who make our success and our sustainable ingredients possible. We endeavor to support and empower our employees, customers, suppliers and communities in all that we do.
Notable 2023 achievements in this area included:
Enhanced an array of employee programs.
Completed training on measurable goals for both annualpatented technologies.
Made high-value capital investments in our local communities.
Saw further improvement in our OSHA recordable injury rate, achieving a 56% reduction in 2023 over our 2020 baseline and long-term awards

exceeding our goal of a 35% reduction by 2025.


       Balanced mix of awards tied to annual and long-term performance

14

       Stock ownership and retention policy

GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

LOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR AN ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 9, 2018

This Proxy Statement is provided to the shareholders of Green Plains Inc. in

connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”)

to be voted at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at the 10:00 a.m.,

Central Standard Time, at the Omaha Marriott Downtown at the Capital District

located at 222 N 10th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, on Wednesday, May 9,

2018, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy is first being sent or made

available to shareholders on or around March 29, 2018. This Proxy Statement

provides information that should be helpful to you in deciding how to vote on the

matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

We are asking you to elect the four nominees identified in this Proxy Statement

as directors of GPI until the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders and to vote to

approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation.

Corporate Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In accordance with the General Corporation Law of the State of Iowa, our restated certificateThird Articles of incorporation,Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (our “Charter”), and our amendedFifth Amended and restated bylaws,Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”), our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of the Board.

Independent Directors

Under the corporate governance listing standards of the NASDAQ and our committee charters, the Board must consist of a majority of independent directors. In making independence determinations, the Board observes NASDAQ and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) criteria and considers all relevant facts and circumstances. The Board, in coordination with its Nominating and Governance Committee, annually reviews all relevant business relationships any director nominee may have with our Company. As a result of its annual review, the Board has determined that each of its currentnon-employee directors meet the independence requirements of the NASDAQ and the SEC.

Meetings of the Board

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Board held four regular meetings and two special meetings. Each of the serving directors attended at least 83% of all meetings held by the Board and at least 87.5% of each committee meeting of the Board on which the applicable director served during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The Board and committees met in executive session, without management at each meeting.

The table below shows the meeting attendance for each director in 2017.

NAMEBoardAudit CommitteeCompensation
Committee
Nominating and
Governance
Committee
Overall Attendance  

Wayne Hoovestol, Chairman

6 of 6---6 of 6 (100%)     

Jim Anderson

5 of 67 of 811 of 11-23 of 25 (92%)     

Todd Becker

6 of 6---6 of 6 (100%)     

James Crowley

6 of 68 of 8--14 of 14 (100%)     

Gene Edwards

6 of 68 of 810 of 11-24 of 25 (96%)     

Gordon Glade

6 of 68 of 8-4 of 418 of 18 (100%)     

Ejnar Knudsen

6 of 68 of 8--14 of 14 (100%)     

Thomas Manuel

6 of 6-11 of 114 of 421 of 21 (100%)     

Brian Peterson

6 of 6--4 of 410 of 10 (100%)     

Alain Treuer

5 of 6-11 of 114 of 420 of 21 (95%)     

Communications with the Board

Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board as a whole, or with individual directors, may direct any correspondence to the following address: c/o Corporate Secretary, Green Plains Inc., 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. All communications sent to this address will be shared with the Board, or the Board Chairman or any other specific director, if so addressed.

It is a policy of the Board to encourage, but not require, directors to attend each annual meeting of shareholders. The Board’s attendance allows for direct interaction between shareholders and members of the Board. All of our directors, with the exception of one, attended our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board and each of its committees are involved in overseeing risk associated with our company. In its oversight role, the Board annually reviews our company’s strategic plan, which addresses, among other things, the risks and opportunities facing our company. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, it has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibilities to the Board committees.

One of the primary purposes of the Audit Committee, as set forth in its charter, is to act on behalf of the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee company processes for the management of business/financial risk and for compliance with applicable legal, ethical and regulatory requirements. Accordingly, as part of its responsibilities as set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee is charged with (i) inquiring of management and our company’s outside auditors about significant risks and exposures and assessing the steps management has taken or needs to take to minimize such risks and (ii) overseeing our company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the development and maintenance of an internal audit function to provide management and the Audit Committee with ongoing assessments of our company’s risk management processes and internal controls. In connection with these risk oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has regular meetings with our company’s management, internal auditors and independent, external auditors.

The Nominating and Governance Committee annually reviews our company’s corporate governance guidelines and their implementation, as well as regularly evaluates new and continuing directors for election to the Board. The Compensation Committee considers risks related to the attraction and retention of talented senior management and other employees as well as risks relating to the design of compensation programs and arrangements. Each committee provides the Board with regular, detailed reports regarding committee meetings and actions. In addition, our company employs an Executive Vice President – Risk who reports directly to our CEO with respect to risk management and provides regular updates and reports to our CEO and Board regarding all of our company’s commodity risk positions.

Committees of the Board

The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which has a charter setting forth its responsibilities. Board members also possess key knowledge and skills as noted in the table below:

      Skill

Jim
Anderson
Todd
Becker
James
Crowley
Gene
Edwards
Gordon
Glade
Wayne
Hoovestol
Ejnar
Knudsen
Thomas
Manuel
Brian
Peterson
Alain
Treuer

  Executive

  Management

xxxxxxxxxx

  Finance /

  Financial

  Expert

xxxxxxxx

  Compensation

xxxxxxx

  Risk

  Management

xxxxxxxxx

  Industry

  Knowledge

xxxxxxxxx

  Technology

xxxx

  Government

  Relations

xxxxxx

  Accounting

xxxxxxx

  Legal /

  Regulatory

xxx

  International

  Business

xxxxxx

  Strategy

  Development

xxxxxxxx

  Mergers &

  Acquisitions

xxxxxxxxx

  Corporate

  Governance

xxxxxxxx

The tables which follow set forth committee memberships as of the date of this proxy.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, currently consists of Messrs. Crowley (Chairman), Anderson, Edwards, Glade and Knudsen, each of whom is independent under the rules of the NASDAQ and the SEC. Mr. Crowley has been determined to be an audit committee financial expert as defined in Rule 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K. The Audit Committee continued its standing practice of meeting directly with our internal audit staff to discuss the current year’s audit plan and to allow for direct interaction between the Audit Committee members and our internal auditors. The Audit Committee also meets directly with our independent auditors. The Audit Committee met eight times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. During each of these meetings, the Audit Committee met directly with our independent auditors.

The function of the Audit Committee, as detailed in its charter and available on the company’s website, is to provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to the shareholders, potential shareholders, and investment community relating to corporate accounting, reporting practices, and the quality and integrity of our financial reports. In doing so, it is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to maintain free and open means of communication between the directors, the independent auditors and our management.

Please see page 47 of this Proxy Statement for the “Report of the Audit Committee.”

COMPENSATION COMMITTEEProposal 1  

The Compensation Committee currently consists

Election of Messrs. Treuer (Chairman), Anderson, Edwards and Manuel,Directors
To be elected, each nominee for director must receive a plurality of whom is independent under the rules of the NASDAQ and the SEC. The Compensation Committee met 11 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

The Compensation Committee establishes our general compensation policy and, except as prohibited by law, may take any and all actions that the Board could take relating to compensation of directors, executive officers, employees and other parties. The Compensation Committee’s role is to (i) evaluate the performance of our executive officers, (ii) set compensation for directors and executive officers, (iii) make recommendations to the Board on adoption of compensation plans and (iv) administer our compensation plans, including choosing performance measures, setting performance targets and evaluating performance, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer. When evaluating potential compensation adjustments, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers input providedvotes cast by the Chief Executive Officer relatingshares of Common Stock present in person (online) or represented by proxy and entitled to the individual performance and contribution to our overall performance by executive officers (other than himself) and other key employees.

As permitted by the Compensation Committee Charter, whichvote (assuming a quorum is available on the company’s website, the Compensation Committee retained the services of an independent compensation adviser to provide consulting servicespresent) with respect to the company’s executive compensation program. In December 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”)that nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will not be counted as its compensation adviser for the remainder of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018. Pursuant to the terms of its engagement by the Compensation Committee, in 2017 and early 2018, Meridian provided advice regarding our executive compensation programs in relation to the objectives of those programs and provided information and advice on competitive compensation practices and trends, along with specific views on our executive compensation programs. In its role as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, representatives of Meridian engaged in discussions with the Compensation Committee and responded on a regular basis to questions from the Committee, providing them with their opinionsvote cast "for" or "against" with respect to the design of current or proposed compensation programs. During fiscal 2017, Meridian reported directly to the Compensation Committee and the Committee retained the sole authority to retain or terminate their services.

a nominee.

Please see page 31 of this Proxy Statement for the “Compensation Committee Report.”

NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Peterson (Chairman), Glade, Manuel and Treuer, Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR”each of whom is independent under the rules of the NASDAQ and the SEC. The Nominating and Governance Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

The function of the Nominating and Governance Committee, as detailednominees set forth in its charter and available on the company’s website, is to recommend to the Board the slate of director nominees for election to the Board, to identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual shareholder meetings, and to review and address governance items. The Nominating and Governance Committee has established certain broad qualifications in order to consider a proposed candidate for election to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider such other factors as it deems appropriate to assist in developing a Board and committees that are diverse in nature and comprised of experienced and seasoned advisors. These factors include judgment, skill, diversity (such as race, gender or experience), integrity, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board.

Proposal 1.

Code of Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics to which all officers, directors and employees, who for purposes of the Code of Ethics are collectively referred to as employees, are required to adhere in addressing the legal and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Ethics requires that all employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws, rules and regulations, conduct business in an honest and fair manner, and otherwise act with integrity. Employees are required to report any violations of the Code of Ethics and may do so anonymously by contacting https://gpreinc.alertline.com. The Code of Ethics includes specific provisions applicable to the company’s principal executive officer and senior financial officers. The full text of the code of ethics is published on our website in the “Investors – Corporate Governance” section.

The Board also has adopted a Related Party Policy which addresses our company’s procedures with respect to the review and approval of “related party transactions” that are required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC regulations. The Code of Ethics provides that any transaction or activity in which the company is involved with a “related party” (which is defined as an employee’s child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, orsister-in-law, or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of an employee of ours, or any entity that is either wholly or substantially owned or controlled by an employee of ours or any of the foregoing persons and any trust of which an employee of ours is a trustee or beneficiary) shall be subject to review and approval by our Audit Committee so that appropriate measures can be put into place to avoid either an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Stock Ownership Guidelines: Prohibition on Short-Term and Speculative Trading and Pledging

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of ournon-employee directors and officers with those of our shareholders, by requiring the following minimum investment in company Common Stock:

ROLEMINIMUM OWNERSHIP

Chief Executive Officer

6x base salary

Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

4x base salary

All other NEO’s

3x base salary

Non-Employee Directors

5x annual cash retainer

Furthermore, our directors and each officer who is subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is prohibited from holding Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan, with one director being granted an exception for the pledge of shares.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No Compensation Committee member (i) was an officer or employee of GPI, (ii) was formerly an officer of GPI or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure under the SEC’s rules governing disclosure of related person transactions. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, we had no “interlocking” relationships in which (i) an executive officer of GPI served as a member of the Compensation Committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of GPI, (ii) an executive officer of GPI served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of GPI, or (iii) an executive officer of GPI served as a member of the Compensation Committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of GPI.

PROPOSAL1- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Introduction

The Boardcurrently consists of teneight members and is currently divided into threetwo groups. OnePreviously each group of directors iswas elected at each annual meeting of shareholders for a three-year term. Each year a different group of directors iswas elected on a rotating basis. At the 2022 annual meeting, there was a declassification of the board of directors such that each group going forward will serve one-year terms through a phase in period until 2025. Beginning with the 2025 annual meeting, all directors will be elected annually.

The terms of James D. Anderson, Todd A. Becker, Thomas Manuel,Ejnar A. Knudsen III, Brian Peterson, and Alain Treuer and Kimberly Wagner are up for reelectionelection at the Annual Meeting (to serve until the 20212025 annual meeting or until their respective successors shall be elected and qualified). The terms of James Crowley, Gene EdwardsMartin Salinas Jr. and Gordon GladeFarha Aslam expire at the 20192025 annual meeting. meeting, at which time they will be up for annual election.
Board Recommendation
The termsBoard recommends that stockholders vote for each of Jim Anderson, Wayne Hoovestolthe nominees outlined.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE15
Director Nominee Biographical Information and Ejnar Knudsen expireExperience
Nominees for Election at the 2020 annual meeting.

LOGO

2024 Annual Meeting

Image_94.jpg
James D. Anderson
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer, Molycop
Age: 66
Director Since: 2008
Committees: Compensation
Director Qualifications
Mr. Anderson is qualified to serve as a director because of his commodity experience and agribusiness knowledge, which provides the Board with a relevant depth of understanding of our operations.
Past Public Company Directorships
United Malt Holdings
Background
Chief Executive Officer of Molycop since November 2017
Served as Managing Director and Operating Partner at CHAMP Private Equity
Served The Gavilon Group, LLC as its President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2014 until February 2016 as well as its Chief Operating Officer, Fertilizer, since February 2010
Served as Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors at United Malt Holdings, a producer of malt for use in the brewing and distilling industries, from September 2006 to February 2010
Served as Chief Operating Officer / Executive Vice President of CT Malt, a joint venture between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Tiger Brands of South Africa, beginning in April 2003
Served as Senior Vice President and then President of ConAgra Grain Companies
His career has also included association with the firm Ferruzzi USA and as an Operations Manager for Pillsbury Company
Served as a Board Member of the North American Export Grain Association and the National Grain and Feed Association
Holds a Bachelor of Arts degree with a Finance emphasis from the University of Wisconsin - Platteville
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/ Marketing
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/Cybersecurity
Legal/Regulatory/Gov’t Rel
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Executive Leadership
Executive Compensation


16
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Image_98.jpg
Todd A. Becker
President and Chief Executive Officer, Green Plains Inc.
Age: 58
Director Since: 2009
Committees: None
Director Qualifications
Mr. Becker is qualified to serve as a director because he provides an insider’s perspective about our business and strategic direction to Board discussions. His extensive commodity experience and leadership make him an essential member of the Board.
Current Public Company Directorships
Core Scientific Inc. (CORZ)
Past Public Company Directorships
Hillshire Brands Company (HSH)
Green Plains Partners LP (GPP)
Background
Our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2009
Served as President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as a director, of Green Plains Holdings LLC from March 2015 to January 2024
Serves on the board of directors of Core Scientific Inc.
Served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2008 to December 2008
Served as Chief Executive Officer of VBV LLC from May 2007 to October 2008
Executive Vice President of Sales and Trading at Global Ethanol from May 2006 to May 2007
Worked for ten years at ConAgra Foods, Inc. in various management positions, including Vice President of International Marketing for ConAgra Trade Group and President of ConAgra Grain Canada
Has 36 years of related experience in various commodity processing businesses, risk management and supply chain management, along with extensive international trading experience in agricultural markets
Mr. Becker has a Master’s degree in Finance from the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a Finance emphasis from the University of Kansas
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/ Marketing
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/ Cybersecurity
Legal/Regulatory/Gov’t Rel
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Executive Leadership


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE17
Image_96.jpg
Ejnar A. Knudsen III
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, AGR Partners
Age: 55
Director Since: 2016
Committees: None
Director Qualifications
Mr. Knudsen is qualified to serve as a director because of his operating company and finance experience, as well as his agribusiness industry network and knowledge, which provides the Board with a relevant depth of understanding of our operations.
Current Public Company Directorships
Ridley Corporation Limited (RIC:AX)
Background
Founder and CEO of AGR Partners, and oversees the firm’s strategy with investments totaling over $400 million in food processors, manufacturers and agribusinesses
Co-portfolio manager of Passport Capital’s Agriculture Fund from 2009 to 2012
Served as EVP of Western Milling, a grain and feed milling company that grew from a small California startup to over $1 billion in sales
Spent 10 years with Rabobank, in its New York office, managing a loan portfolio and venture capital investments as well as providing corporate advisory services
Received his Bachelor of Science degree from Cornell University and is a CFA charter holder
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/Marketing
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/Cybersecurity
Executive Leadership
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Image_99.jpg
Brian Peterson
President and Chief Executive Officer, Whiskey Creek Enterprises
Age: 60
Director Since: 2005
Committees: Compensation (Chair)
Director Qualifications
Mr. Peterson is qualified to serve as a director because of his ethanol and grain industry experience, which serves as an important resource to the Board.
Background
President and Chief Executive Officer of Whiskey Creek Enterprises
Served as our Executive Vice President in charge of site development from 2005 to October 2008
Sole founder and owner of Superior Ethanol LLC, which was acquired by us in 2006
For over twenty years, he has owned and operated grain farming entities, which now includes acreages in Iowa, Arkansas and South Dakota
Built, owns and operates a cattle feedlot in northwest Iowa
Has a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Business from Dordt College
Investor in several other ethanol companies
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/ Marketing
Audit/Risk/ Cybersecurity
Executive Leadership


18
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
05_429139-1_pic_nominees.jpg
Alain Treuer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Tellac Reuert Partners and Chairman, Local Ocean France
Age: 51
Director Since: 2008
Committees: Audit, Nominating and Governance
Director Qualifications
Mr. Treuer is qualified to serve as a director because his business experiences, combined with his education and global acumen, allow him to provide unique operational insights to the Board.
Background
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tellac Reuert Partners (TRP SA), a global investment firm, since 2005
Co-Founder and Executive Chairman of Local Ocean France, a land-based RAS fish farming company
Chairman of Trivon AG (Virgin Connect)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TIGC, a global telecommunications company that he founded in 1992 and sold in 2001
Has approximately 36 years of experience as an entrepreneur in various industries around the globe
Has a Master’s degree in Business Administration from the Graduate School of Business at Columbia University in New York, a Bachelor of Economics degree from the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland, a Presidents’ Program in Leadership from Harvard Business School and is an active member of the Young Presidents Organization
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/ Marketing
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/ Cybersecurity
Public Co/Corp Govern/Corp ESG
Executive Leadership



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE19
Image_97.jpg
Kimberly Wagner
Founder, TBGD Partners
Age: 60
Director Since: 2020
Committees: Nominating and Governance (Chair), Audit
Director Qualifications
Ms. Wagner is qualified to serve as a director because of her extensive agribusiness and food/nutrition experience, which provides the Board with a relevant depth of understanding of our operations. Ms. Wagner is a scientist, entrepreneur and business leader with over two decades of experience advising companies on strategy and operational improvement in the agricultural, food and life sciences sectors with an emphasis in technology, sustainability, research and innovation, and new product development.
Background
Founder of TBGD Partners, a boutique firm providing expertise to early and mid-stage ventures in the agribusiness, food/nutrition and life sciences sectors
Former Venture Partner at Flagship Pioneering and President and Chief Operating Officer of CiBO Technologies, a Flagship VentureLabs company from 2018 to 2019
Former Partner at McKinsey & Co. from 2016 to 2018
Former Partner and Senior Partner at The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. from 2001 to 2015
Serves on the board of Frontier Co-Op and is a former director at SmithFoods, Inc.
Her accomplishments in client service have been acknowledged through multiple awards, including being named a Women Leader in Consulting by Consulting magazine in 2012
Holds certifications in Sustainability, ESG and Climate and Biodiversity
Alumni-elected member of Cornell University’s Board of Trustees and serves on the boards of several not-for-profit organizations with agricultural, sustainability and/or educational missions and is an active member of several national and international scientific societies
Holds a PhD in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology from Harvard University, a Master of Science in Animal Science from Texas A&M University, and a Bachelor of Science with distinction in Biology and Animal Science from Cornell University
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Audit/Risk/Cybersecurity
Legal/Regulatory/Gov’t Rel
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Executive Leadership


20
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Continuing Directors with Terms Expiring in 2025
pg14_photo-aslamf.jpg
Farha Aslam
Managing Partner, Crescent House Capital
Age: 55
Director Since: 2021
Committees: Compensation
Director Qualifications
Ms. Aslam is qualified to serve as a director because of her extensive knowledge of the agriculture and ethanol industries, as well as her investor and financial knowledge from years working at a leading investment bank, providing the Board with valued industry experience.
Current Public Company Directorships
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (PPC)
Calavo Growers, Inc. (CVGW)
AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX)
Background
Managing Partner of Crescent House Capital
Previous experience includes service as Managing Director at Stephens Inc where she led the firm’s Food and Agribusiness equity research team. Previously she was a vice president at Merrill Lynch and a risk management advisor at UBS
In addition to the current public company directorships, also serves on the boards of Farmers Fridge, Packers Sanitation Services, Inc. and Saffron Road
Serves as a member of the audit and sustainability committees at Pilgrim's Pride and a member of the audit and compensation committees at AdvanSix
Has a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Columbia University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the University of California
Skills
Industrial Mfg & Ingredient Prod
Commodity Markets/Marketing
Strategy Development
International Business
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/ Cybersecurity
Legal/Regulatory/ Gov’t Rel
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Executive Leadership
Executive Compensation


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE21
Image_93.jpg
Martin Salinas Jr.
Former Chief Financial Officer Energy Transfer Partners, LP
Age: 52
Director Since: 2021
Committees: Audit (Chair),Nominating and Governance
Director Qualifications
Mr. Salinas is qualified to serve as a director because he possesses the requisite education and business acumen to serve as an audit committee financial expert along with having served on other boards as well as the CFO of another public company.
Current Public Company Directorships
NuStar Energy L.P. (NS)
Past Public Company Directorships
Noble Midstream Partners L.P. (NBLX)
Green Plains Partners LP (GPP)
Background
Former Chief Financial Officer of Energy Transfer Partners, LP, one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships from 2008 to 2015. Prior to that, he served as their controller and vice president of finance from 2004 to 2008
Serves as an audit committee member at NuStar Energy
Began his career at KPMG
Advisory council member of the University of Texas in San Antonio
Holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas in San Antonio. He is a member of the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants
Skills
Commodity Markets/Marketing
Strategy Development
M&A/Partnerships
Capital Markets
Audit/Risk/ Cybersecurity
Public Co/Corp Govern/ESG
Executive Leadership
Executive Compensation
Board Diversity Matrix
Total Current Number of Directors: 8
FemaleMaleNon-BinaryDid Not Disclose Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors26
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black
Alaskan Native or Native American
Asian1
Hispanic1
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White15
Two or More Races or Ethnicities
LGBTQ+
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background


22
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Director Nomination Process

The Board is responsible for approving nominees for election as directors. To assist in this task, the Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending nominees to the Board. This committee is comprised solely of independent directors as defined by the rules of the NASDAQ and the SEC.

The Board has a policy of considering director nominees recommended by our shareholders. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective board nominee for the Nominating and Governance Committee’s consideration can write to the Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o Michelle S. Mapes, Corporate Secretary, Green Plains Inc., 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, NE 68106. In addition to considering nominees recommended by shareholders, our Nominating and Governance Committee also considers prospective board nominees recommended by current directors, management and other sources. Our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates all prospective board nominees in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation.

As part of the nomination process, our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board periodically the appropriate skills and characteristics required of directors in the context of the currentmake-up of the Board. This assessment includes issues of judgment, diversity, experience and skills. In evaluating prospective nominees, including nominees recommended by shareholders, our Nominating and Governance Committee looks for the following minimum qualifications, qualities and skills:

1. Assessment
As part of the nomination process, our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board periodically the appropriate skills and characteristics required of directors in the context of the current make-up of the Board. This assessment includes issues of judgment, diversity, experience and skills.
Image_0.jpg

2. Evaluation of prospective nominees
In evaluating prospective nominees, including nominees recommended by shareholders, our Nominating and Governance Committee looks for the following minimum qualifications, qualities and skills:
highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;

outstanding achievement in the individual’s personal career;

breadth of experience;

ability to make independent, analytical inquiries;

ability to contribute to a diversity of viewpoints among board members;

willingness and ability to devote the time required to perform board activities adequately (in this regard, the committee will consider the number of other boards of directors on which the individual serves); and

ability to represent the total corporate interests of our companyCompany (a director will not be selected to, nor will he or she be expected to, represent the interests of any particular group).
Image_0.jpg
3. Screening/ interview of shortlisted candidates
Candidates go through a rigorous interview process with Nominating and Governance Committee members as well as Board leadership and CEO interviews. They are subjected to thorough background checks and complete the Company’s directors and officer’s questionnaire.
Image_0.jpg
4. Decision, nomination, and onboarding
Board members who interview candidates provide their candidate reviews for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee. Once a candidate is elected or appointed to the Board, they partake in an extensive onboarding process with both Board members and the executive leadership of the Company.



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE23
As set forth above, our Nominating and Governance Committee considers diversity as one of a number of factors in identifying nominees for director. The Committee adopted a policy in 2017 specifically addressing gender diversity whereby it resolved to ensure that when a vacancy arises on the Board, it will ensure the candidate pool always contains at least one diverse candidate specifically with respect to gender. Based on shareholder comments, the Committee is continuing to evaluate additionalevaluated ways to address gender diversity in particular. The Committee also views diversity broadlyparticular, and after completing a search process, in October 2020, the Board appointed Ms. Wagner to include diversitythe Board of experience, skillsDirectors, in July 2021, the Board appointed Mr. Salinas to the Board of Directors, and viewpoint as well as traditional diversity concepts such as race, national origin and gender.

in October 2021, the Board appointed Ms. Aslam to the Board of Directors.

Shareholders who wish to submit a proposal for inclusion of a nominee for director in our proxy materials must also comply with the deadlines and requirements of our bylawsBylaws and of Rule14a-8 promulgated by the SEC. Please see “Additional Information”Shareholder Proposals in this Proxy Statement for more information regarding the procedures for submission by a shareholder of a director nominee or other proposals.

Set forth below

Leadership Structure
Board Leadership
The roles of the Chairman of the Board are as follows:
Responsibilities of the Chairman of the Board
Presides at all meetings of the Board of Directors.
Is available, when appropriate, for consultation and direct communication with stockholders.
Sets the Board agenda in conjunction with the CEO.
Sets agenda for executive sessions.
Has the authority to call Board meetings.


24
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Diversity and Refreshment
Based on investor feedback and the 2017 policy of the Board focused on diversity, the Board has increased its diversity so that over one-third of the Board is now diverse. Further, it placed two of its diverse directors in Committee leadership roles. In July of 2021, it refreshed the Board with four of its prior Board members retiring or otherwise resigning to allow for the appointment of new directors who brought age, principal occupationgender and certain other information forracial diversity to the Board.
AGEDIRECTOR TENUREGENDER DIVERSITYRACIALLY/ ETHNICALLY
DIVERSE
04_429139-3_gfx_boardsnapshots_age.jpg
04_429139-3_gfx_boardsnapshots_directortenure.jpg
04_429139-3_gfx_diversity&refreshment_gender diversity.jpg
Asian1
Hispanic1
Caucasian6
03_429139-3_charts_Age.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_director_tenure.jpg
Independent Directors
Under the corporate governance listing standards of NASDAQ and our committee charters, the Board must consist of a majority of independent directors. In making independence determinations, the Board observes NASDAQ and SEC criteria and considers all relevant facts and circumstances. The Board, in coordination with its Nominating and Governance Committee, annually reviews all relevant business relationships any director nominee may have with our Company. As a result of its annual review, the Board has determined that each of its current non-employee directors meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ and the SEC.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE25
Committees of the Board
The Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which has a charter setting forth its responsibilities. Each charter can be found at https://investor.gpreinc.com/governance/governance-documents.
The tables which follow set forth committee memberships as of the date of this proxy:
Audit
Committee
Members
Martin Salinas Jr. (Chair)
Alain Treuer
Kimberly Wagner
Meetings in 2023: 7
The Audit Committee consists of directors who are independent under the rules of NASDAQ and the SEC.
During each of these meetings, the Audit Committee met directly with our independent auditors.
Please see page 38 of this Proxy Statement for the “Audit Committee Report.”
Principal Responsibilities:
Provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to the shareholders, potential shareholders, and investment community relating to corporate accounting, reporting practices, and the quality and integrity of our financial reports, as well as oversight of the Company’s information technology, including cybersecurity practices.
Maintain free and open means of communication between the directors, the independent auditors and our management.
The Audit Committee continued its standing practice of meeting directly with our internal audit staff to discuss the current year’s audit plan and to allow for direct interaction between the Audit Committee members and our internal auditors. The Audit Committee also meets directly with our independent auditors.
The Audit Committee has oversight of management's efforts with respect to IT systems and cybersecurity. As part of this oversight, the company's IT leadership meets on a quarterly basis with the Audit Committee and on an annual basis with the Board. During these update meetings, IT leadership provides the Audit Committee and Board updates regarding any changes around our cyber defenses, ongoing IT initiatives, and emerging threats and plans to pro-actively encounter these threats.
The Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, consists of directors who are independent under the rules of NASDAQ and the SEC. Mr. Salinas has been determined to be audit committee financial expert as defined in Rule 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.


26
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation
Committee
Members
Brian Peterson (Chair)
James D. Anderson
Farha Aslam
Meetings in 2023: 7
The Compensation Committee consists of directors who are independent under the rules of NASDAQ and the SEC.
Please see page 63 of this Proxy Statement for the “Compensation Committee Report.”
Principal Responsibilities:
Establish our general compensation policy and, except as prohibited by law, may take any and all actions that the Board could take relating to compensation of directors, executive officers, employees and other parties.
Evaluate the performance of our executive officers.
Set compensation for directors and executive officers.
Make recommendations to the Board on adoption of compensation plans.
Administer our compensation plans, including choosing performance measures, setting performance targets and evaluating performance, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer.
When evaluating potential compensation adjustments, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers input provided by the Chief Executive Officer relating to the individual performance and contribution to our overall performance by executive officers (other than himself) and other key employees.
As permitted by the Compensation Committee Charter, which is available on the Company’s website, the Compensation Committee retained the services of an independent compensation adviser to provide consulting services with respect to the Company’s executive compensation program. In 2021, the Compensation Committee engaged a new consultant, Pay Governance (“Pay Governance”), as its compensation adviser. Pursuant to the terms of its engagement by the Compensation Committee, Pay Governance provided advice regarding our executive compensation programs in relation to the objectives of those programs and provided information and advice on competitive compensation practices and trends, peer groups, and short term and long-term incentive plan designs. In its role as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, representatives of Pay Governance engaged in discussions with the Compensation Committee and responded on a regular basis to questions from the Committee, providing them with their opinions with respect to the design of current or proposed compensation programs. Pay Governance reported directly to the Compensation Committee and the Committee retained the sole authority to retain or terminate their services.
In 2023, to create and maintain a culture that emphasizes integrity and accountability and that reinforces the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, and to comply with Section 10D and Rule 10D-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Board updated its clawback policy which provides for the recoupment of certain executive compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting from material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE27
Nominating and Governance Committee
Members
Kimberly Wagner (Chair)
Martin Salinas Jr.
Alain Treuer
Meetings in 2023: 4
The Nominating and Governance Committee consists of directors who are independent under the rules of the NASDAQ and the SEC.
Principal Responsibilities:
Recommend to the Board the slate of director nominees for election to the Board.
Identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual shareholder meetings.
Review and address governance items.
Oversight of the Company’s sustainability initiatives.
The Nominating and Governance Committee has established certain broad qualifications in order to consider a proposed candidate for election to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider such other factors as it deems appropriate to assist in developing a director.

NomineesBoard and committees that are diverse in nature and comprised of experienced and seasoned advisors. These factors include judgment, skill, diversity (such as race, gender or experience), integrity, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, the interplay of the candidate’s experience with the experience of other Board members, and the extent to which the candidate would be a desirable addition to the Board and any committees of the Board.



28
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Board Oversight
Risk Oversight
The Board and each of its committees are involved in overseeing risk associated with our Company.
BoardIn its oversight role, the Board annually reviews our Company’s strategic plan, which addresses, among other things, the risks and opportunities facing our Company. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, it has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibilities to the Board committees.
pgxx-graphicarrowup.jpg
Audit Committee
Acts on behalf of the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee company processes for the management of business/financial risk and for compliance with applicable legal, ethical and regulatory requirements.
Charged with (i) inquiring of management and our Company’s outside auditors about significant risks and exposures and assessing the steps management has taken or needs to take to minimize such risks and (ii) overseeing our Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the development and maintenance of an internal audit function to provide management and the Audit Committee with ongoing assessments of our Company’s risk management processes and internal controls.
Has quarterly meetings with IT leadership regarding the risk management processes and internal controls around our IT systems and cybersecurity.
Has regular meetings with our Company’s management, internal auditors and independent, external auditors.
Compensation Committee
Considers risks related to the attraction and retention of talented senior management and other employees as well as risks relating to the design of compensation programs and arrangements.
Nominating and Governance Committee
Annually reviews our Company’s corporate governance guidelines and their implementation, as well as regularly evaluating new and continuing directors for election to the Board.
Annually leads the board evaluation process.
Annually reviews the CEO succession plans.
Each committee provides the Board with regular, detailed reports regarding committee meetings and actions.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE29
Strategic Oversight
The Board is elected by the shareholders to oversee their interests in the long-term performance and success of the Company’s business and financial performance. The Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for Election atthose matters reserved to or shared with the 2018 Annual Meeting

TODD BECKER, 52, who has served as Presidentshareholders. The Board oversees the proper safeguarding of the assets of the Company, the maintenance of appropriate financial and other internal controls and the Company’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations and proper governance. The Board selects the Chief Executive Officer since January 2009,and oversees the members of senior management, who are charged by the Board with conducting the business of the Company.

Oversight of Strategy
The Board oversees and monitors strategic planning.
Business strategy is a key focus at the Board level and embedded in the work of Board committees.
Company management is charged with executing business strategy and provides regular performance updates to the Board.
Oversight
of Risk
The Board oversees risk management
Board committees, which meet regularly and report back to the full Board, play significant roles in carrying out the risk oversight function.
Company management is charged with managing risk, through robust internal processes and effective internal controls.
Succession Planning
The Board oversees succession planning and talent development for senior executive positions.
The Nominating & Governance Committee, which meets regularly and reports back to the Board, has primary responsibility for developing succession plans for the CEO position.
Oversight of Strategy
Oversight of the Company’s business strategy and strategic planning is a key responsibility of the Board. The Board believes that overseeing and monitoring strategy is a continuous process and takes a multilayered approach in exercising its duties.
04_429139-1_gfx_oversightstrategy.jpg
While the Board and its committees oversee strategic planning, Company management is charged with executing the business strategy. To monitor performance against the Company’s strategic goals, the Board receives regular updates and actively engages in dialogue with our Company’s senior leaders. These boardroom discussions are enhanced with site visits from time to time, which provide Directors an opportunity to see strategy execution firsthand.


30
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
The Board’s oversight and management’s execution of business strategy are viewed with a long-term mindset and a focus on assessing both opportunities for and potential risks to the Company.
Oversight of Risk
Inherent in the Board’s responsibilities is an understanding of and oversight of the various risks facing the Company. The Board does not view risk in isolation. Risks are considered in virtually every business decision. The Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. Indeed, purposeful and appropriate risk taking is essential for the Company to be competitive and to achieve the Company’s long-term strategic objectives. Effective risk oversight is an important priority of the Board. The Board undertakes to understand critical risks in the Company’s business and strategy; allocate responsibilities for risk oversight among the full Board and its committees; evaluate if the Company’s risk management and control processes are sufficient and functioning properly and to facilitate open dialogue between the Board and management on all aspects of risks facing the Company.
To learn more about risks facing the Company, you can review the factors included in Part I, "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in the Form 10-K. The risks described in the Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that may currently be deemed to be immaterial based on the information known to the Company also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations in future periods.
Cybersecurity
The Company has implemented cyber defenses to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our data. Our cybersecurity program follows the National Institute of Standards and Technology, as well as the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency frameworks. Additionally, we follow federal and state statutory and regulatory guidance and have adopted internal policies and standards in alignment with these federal and state requirements. Furthermore, we collaborate with external experts, consultants and auditors in routinely evaluating and testing our information systems controls. We also perform an annual cyber table-top exercise with a regulatory agency to help us test and continue to develop our Cyber Incident Response Plan. The Audit Committee has oversight of management's efforts with respect to information technology (IT) and cybersecurity. The Audit Committee meets on a quarterly basis with our IT leadership to go over updates regarding any changes around our cyber defenses, ongoing IT initiatives, and emerging threats and plans to pro-actively encounter these threats. To date (including over the last three years), we have not identified a cybersecurity breach incident that would have a material impact on our business and consolidated financial statements. Management continuously monitors the effectiveness of our cybersecurity defenses. We invest in regular and ongoing cybersecurity training for our information technology department and company overall. For more information regarding our oversight of cybersecurity risks, please refer to Item 1C Cybersecurity in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE31
Sustainability Oversight
Our sustainability efforts focus on areas determined to be of greatest importance to both our business success and our key stakeholders. We identify our key sustainability areas of focus, or key topics, by assessing a wide range of information. This analysis guides our data collection, goal setting, strategy development and disclosure. Throughout this stakeholder-oriented, data-driven and forward-looking process, we communicate directly with key internal and external stakeholders, leverage environmental, social and governance (ESG) research and ratings, and vet our analysis against global sustainability frameworks and standards. The Board maintains oversight of all key topics including, but not limited to climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, natural capital and employee health and safety. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board holds primary oversight of key sustainability initiatives and strategy. The remaining committees provide oversight of certain key topics and areas of impact. For example, our Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of information security, cybersecurity and SEC reporting oversight. The day-to-day management and identification of key topics, including climate change, and their impacts, risks and opportunities is the responsibility of our internal ESG workgroup composed of associate, management and executive level employees. Our sustainability reporting is aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards, UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). We are currently working toward alignment with the Task Force on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) framework. We also receive external third-party assurance of select data within our annual sustainability report, including climate-related metrics, from a third-party assurance provider and have received validation of our near-term climate-related targets from the Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi).
PillarsKey Topics and Areas of Impact
pg31_icon_environmental.ai.jpg
Planet
Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Energy Use and Efficiency
Water Management
Biodiversity and Land Stewardship
Waste Management and Compliance
pg31_icon_social.ai.jpg
People
Our Employees
Employee Health and Safety
Talent Acquisition and Engagement
Learning and Career Development
Inclusion and Belonging
Our Customers
Our Suppliers
Responsible Sourcing Program
Our Communities
Environmental Stewardship
Capital Investments
Charitable Giving and Service
pg31_icon_governance.ai.jpg
Principles
Our ESG and Climate Change Governance
Our Board Composition and Structure
Ethics and Compliance
More information can be found in the Sustainability section of our website. Visithttps://gpreinc.com/who-we-are/sustainability.
The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Proxy Statement.


32
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Investor Engagement
We are receptive to investor feedback as part of our robust shareholder engagement program. We participate in investor conferences, non-deal road shows and engage in one-on-one investor calls throughout the year. Our CEO, CFO and other members of our leadership team are available to investors. Feedback from investors is shared with the Board of Directors and the executive team at regularly scheduled meetings. Our engagement has focused on topics including our business strategy, ongoing initiatives, financial performance, and the execution of our transformation. We have incorporated feedback received through engagement with a number of our largest shareholders as well as guidelines published by shareholders and proxy advisory firms over the past year.
Topics discussed with shareholders during 2023:
Company strategy
Government policy
Inflation Reduction Act
Transformation progress
Decarbonization initiatives
Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Ultra-High Protein
Renewable Corn Oil
Clean Sugar Technology
Carbon Capture and Sequestration
Industry supply and demand drivers
Capital allocation
Risk management
Executive compensation programs
Sustainability
Economic drivers
In 2023, we connected with shareholders representing approximately:
Pie Chart_64%-01.jpg
What We HeardWhat We Did
Operational excellence is important.
Invested in efficiency capital and operational personnel, with second half of 2023 average operating utilization improving to 94% capacity.
Shareholders are interested in sustainability initiatives and potential upside from decarbonization strategy.
Under the oversight of our Nominating and Governance Committee, we published our third Sustainability Report in April 2023, highlighting our progress toward our sustainability goals.
Hosted an IRA teach-in in April 2023, educating investors on the opportunities and incentives incorporated in this legislation along with the strategies we are pursuing related to it.
Continue executing on our Green Plains 2.0 Total Transformation Plan.
With five Green Plains facilities operating MSC™ technology, deployed capital to building our Tharaldson Ethanol MSC™ joint venture. Achieved record renewable corn oil yields. Nearing completion of a first-of-its-kind commercial scale Clean Sugar Technology™ system in Shenandoah, Iowa.
Shareholders are supportive of our strategy and management's execution to date to transform the Company to Green Plains 2.0.
We have continued to communicate and update shareholders on our successful completion of key initiatives toward our Total Transformation Plan. We have been transparent in our progress and our performance to date and path to completion have been well received.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE33
Other Governance Principles
Code of Ethics and Other Policies
The Board updated in 2021 the Company’s Code of Ethics to which all officers, directors and employees, who for purposes of the Code of Ethics are collectively referred to as employees, are required to adhere in addressing the legal and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Ethics requires that all officers, directors and employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws, rules and regulations, conduct business in an honest and fair manner, and otherwise act with integrity. All parties covered by the Code of Ethics are required to report any violations of the Code of Ethics and may do so anonymously by contacting the Company’s anonymous hotline at https://gpreinc.alertline.com. The Code of Ethics includes specific provisions applicable to the Company’s principal executive officer and senior financial officers. The full text of the code of ethics is published on our website in the “Investors and Media – Governance” section.
The Board also has adopted a Related Party Policy, which addresses our Company’s procedures with respect to the review and approval of “related party transactions” that are required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC regulations. The Code of Ethics provides that any transaction or activity in which the Company is involved with a “related party” (which is defined as an employee’s child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of an employee of ours, or any entity that is either wholly or substantially owned or controlled by an employee of ours or any of the foregoing persons and any trust of which an employee of ours is a trustee or beneficiary) shall be subject to review and approval by our Audit Committee so that appropriate measures can be put into place to avoid either an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest.
We have also adopted a clawback policy in compliance with the new Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and the corresponding Nasdaq listing standards that requires recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation.
Meeting Attendance and Executive Sessions
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, the Board held four regular meetings and 17 special meetings. Each of our directors attended at least 81% of all meetings held by the Board and committee meetings of the Board on which the applicable director served during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023. The Board met in executive session, without management at each regularly scheduled meeting.
Director Education and Orientation
The Company provides an orientation and continuing education process for Board members to enable them to stay current on developments related to their Board and committee service. Educational opportunities may include courses, seminars, presentations, meetings with key management, and/or visits to Company facilities. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing the Company's programs relating to director orientation and continuing education from time to time. The Company supports continuing education opportunities and reimburses Board members for the cost of continuing education programs.
New Director OrientationAs new directors join the Board, the Company provides a high-touch, customizable orientation and onboarding process. Once concluded, new directors will have an understanding of the Company's business, strategy, and leaders. They should also understand their responsibilities and duties as directors and have access to resources, information, and contacts that will enable them to be effective in their role.
Continuing EducationThe Company supports and directors pursue continuing education opportunities from time to time. The Company reimburses Board members for the cost of continuing education programs.
AdditionalDuring their service, directors have discussions with each other and senior leadership of the Company outside of regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings to share ideas and obtain a deeper understanding of the Company's business.


34
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
The table below shows the meeting attendance for each director in 2023:
NameBoardAudit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating and
Governance
Committee
Overall Attendance
Wayne Hoovestol,
Former Chairman (1)
6 of 7---
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-01.jpg
James D. Anderson, Chairman and Lead
Independent Director (2)
19 of 213 of 37 of 7-
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-02.jpg
Farha Aslam21 of 21-7 of 7-
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-03.jpg
Todd A. Becker21 of 21---
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-04.jpg
Ejnar A. Knudsen III17 of 21---
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-05.jpg
Brian Peterson21 of 21-7 of 7-
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-03-06.jpg
Martin Salinas Jr.18 of 217 of 7-4 of 4
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-07.jpg
Alain Treuer (3)21 of 214 of 4-4 of 4
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-08.jpg
Kimberly Wagner21 of 217 of 7-4 of 4
03_429139-3_chart_overall-attendance-09.jpg
(1)Mr. Hoovestol retired from the Board effective May 9, 2023.
(2)Mr. Anderson became Chairman of the Board and was removed from the Audit Committee effective May 9, 2023.
(3)Mr. Treuer was appointed as a director in March 2009. Mr. Becker has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as a director, of the general partner of Green Plains Partners LP since March 2015. Mr. Becker served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2008 to December 2008. He served as Chief Executive Officer of VBV LLC from May 2007 to October 2008. Mr. Becker was Executive Vice President of Sales and Trading at Global Ethanol from May 2006 to May 2007. Prior to that, he worked for ten years at ConAgra Foods, Inc. in various management positions including Vice President of International Marketing for ConAgra Trade Group and President of ConAgra Grain Canada. Mr. Becker has over 29 years of related experience in various commodity processing businesses, risk management and supply chain management, along with extensive international trading experience in agricultural markets. Mr. Becker served on the board of directors, including its Audit and Compensation Committees, for Hillshire Brands Company from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Becker has a master’s degree in Finance from the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a Finance emphasis from the University of Kansas. Mr. Becker is qualified to serve as a director because he provides an insider’s perspective about our business and strategic direction to Board discussions. His extensive commodity experience and leadership make him an essentialnew member of the Board.

THOMAS MANUEL, 71,Audit Committee effective May 9, 2023.

Communications with the Board
Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board as a whole, or with individual directors, may direct any correspondence to the following address: c/o Corporate Secretary, Green Plains Inc., 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. All communications sent to this address will be shared with the Board, or the Board Chairman or any other specific director, since May 2015, also servesif so addressed.
It is a policy of the Board to encourage, but not require, directors to attend each annual meeting of shareholders. All our directors virtually attended our 2023 annual meeting of shareholders.
Prohibition on Short-Term and Speculative Trading and Pledging
Our directors and officers who are subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are prohibited from holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in 2024, the Company's Insider Policy was amended to clarify that pledging of Company common stock by a family member of an insider is not prohibited, if the applicable insider has disclaimed beneficial ownership of such shares and has not and does not share material, nonpublic information about the Company with such person.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE35
Compensation of Directors
Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, we compensate our non-employee directors through a retainer structure for knowledge of us and the industry in which we operate, serving in a stewardship role, preparing for and attending Board and committee meetings, and serving as Board leadership or a committee Chairperson. In August 2022, each non-employee director cash retainer was increased from $75,000 to $90,000 for serving on the Board, including serving on Board committees. In addition, the Chairman of the Board received a $20,000 retainer, the Audit Committee Chairman received a $20,000 retainer, the Compensation Committee Chairman received a $10,000 retainer and the Nominating and Governance Committees.Committee Chairwoman received a $15,000 retainer. Additionally, in August of 2022, annual individual restricted stock grants were increased from an award equal to $125,000 to $135,000 in value, as measured on the date of grant. Board members are also reimbursed for travel and other business-related expenses. A go-forward summary is as follows:
TypeAmount
Annual Cash Retainer$90,000
Restricted Stock$135,000
Committee Chair RetainersBoard Chair and Audit Committee - $20,000 each
Nominating and Governance Committee - $15,000
Compensation Committee - $10,000
On May 11, 2023, the Company’s non-employee directors each received a grant of 4,497 shares of restricted stock with an award value of $135,000 pursuant to the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. The award vests and shares of Common Stock are issued after one year.
As an employee, Mr. Manuel servesBecker does not receive director compensation. See Summary Compensation Table for information on his compensation.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the fees earned or paid in cash and stock awards granted to each outside director during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023:
NameFees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($) (1)
Option
Awards
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Wayne Hoovestol, Former Chairman (2)39,559 39,559 
James D. Anderson, Chairman (2)102,912 135,000 237,912 
Farha Aslam90,000 135,000 225,000 
Ejnar A. Knudsen III90,000 135,000 225,000 
Brian Peterson100,000 135,000 235,000 
Martin Salinas Jr.110,000 135,000 245,000 
Alain Treuer90,000 135,000 225,000 
Kimberly Wagner105,000 135,000 240,000 
(1)Amounts for “Stock Awards” reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of annual restricted stock grants pursuant to the Plan computed in accordance with ASC 718. On May 11, 2023, our non-employee directors, received a grant of restricted stock with an award value of $135,000, or 4,497 shares of restricted stock, which were outstanding as Chief Executive Officerof December 31, 2023. This grant represents noncash compensation for Board service for the year following that date.
(2)Effective May 9, 2023, Mr. Hoovestol retired from the Board and FounderMr. Anderson was appointed as new Chairman ofNu-Tek Food Science LLC, the Board.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our shareholders, by requiring a food ingredients processing company, a position he has held since August 2011. Prior to that, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc., an ethanol producer from March 2010 to August 2011. From May 2002 to August 2011, Mr. Manuel served as Managing Director of International Strategy Advisors, LLC, providing transaction advisory services to private equity investorsminimum investment in the agribusinesscompany Common Stock of 5x of their annual cash retainer. The Board has three years from joining the Board to come into compliance with these guidelines. For purposes of our stock ownership guidelines, while we do include unvested restricted stock awards, we do not include performance awards that have not vested.


36
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Audit Matters
Proposal 2  
Ratification of Company’s Auditors
The ratification of the selection of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditors for the 2024 fiscal year must be approved by a majority of the votes cast by shares of Common Stock present in person (online) or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter (assuming a quorum is present). Abstentions do not count as votes cast "for" or "against" Proposal 2. If you do not provide voting instructions to your brokerage firm or similar person holding your shares, they will be permitted to vote your shares on Proposal 2 at their discretion.
The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR”the ratification of KPMG as our independent auditor for the 2024 fiscal year as set forth in Proposal 2.
The Board has assessed the performance and food industries. From 1977 until 2002, Mr. Manuel heldindependence of KPMG LLP (KPMG) and recommends that KPMG be re-appointed as the Company’s auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. KPMG has served continuously as our auditor since 2009. In determining whether to recommend the re-appointment of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor, the Audit Committee considered various senior management positionsfactors, including: KPMG’s performance on prior audits, and the quality and efficiency of the services provided by KPMG; an assessment of the firm’s professional qualifications, resources and expertise; KPMG’s knowledge of the Company’s business and industry; the quality of the Audit Committee’s ongoing communications with ConAgra Foods, Inc.KPMG and of the firm’s relationship with the Audit Committee and company management; KPMG’s independence; the length of time the firm has served in this role; the impact on the Company of changing auditors; and data on audit quality and performance, including trading in domesticrecent PCAOB reports on KPMG and international food ingredients, grainpeer firms. Considered together, these factors enable the Audit Committee to evaluate whether the selection of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditor, and energy,the retention of KPMG to perform other services, will contribute to and grain and meat processingenhance audit quality. Based on its evaluation, the Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of various types. Mr. Manuel has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the University of Minnesota. Mr. Manuel is qualifiedKPMG to serve as a director because of his experiencethe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in grain, meat and poultry processing, trading, and commodity and energy merchandising, providing a veteran perspective to Board discussions.

BRIAN PETERSON, 54, a director since May 2005, also serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Peterson currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Whiskey Creek Enterprises. Mr. Peterson served as our Executive Vice President in charge of site development from 2005 to October 2008. Mr. Peterson was the sole founder and owner of Superior Ethanol LLC, which was acquired by us in 2006. For over twenty years, he has owned and operated grain farming entities which now includes acreages in Iowa, Arkansas and South Dakota. Additionally, he built, owns and operates a cattle feedlot in northwest Iowa. Mr. Peterson has a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Business from Dordt College. In addition, he is an investor in several other ethanol companies. Mr. Peterson is qualified to serve as a director because of his ethanol and grain industry experience, which serves as an important resource to the Board.

ALAIN TREUER, 45, a director since October 2008, who has served as Vice Chairman of the Board since August 2015, also serves on the Nominating and Governance Committee and as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Treuer is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tellac Reuert Partners (TRP) SA, a global investment and financial consulting firm. He was appointed as its Chief Executive Officer in 2004 and became Chairman in 2005. Mr. Treuer has also controlled Wilon Holdings S.A. since 2006. Prior to joining TRP SA, he was Chairman of TIGC, a global telecommunications company that he founded in 1992 and sold in 2001. He was originally appointed as a director in 2008 pursuant to a shareholders’ agreement, which is no longer in effect, entered into in connection with our merger with VBV LLC and its subsidiaries. Mr. Treuer has a master’s degree in Business Administration from the Graduate School of Business at Columbia University in New York and a Bachelor of Economics degree from the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. Mr. Treuer is qualified to serve as a director because his business experiences, combined with his education and global acumen, allow him to provide unique operational insights to the Board.

Set forth below is the age, principal occupation and certain other information for eachbest interest of our directors not currently up for election.

Continuing Directors with Terms Expiring in 2019

JAMES CROWLEY, 71, a director since October 2008, also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Crowley has been Chairman and Managing Partner of Old Strategic, LLC since July 2006. His previous experience includes service as Chairman and Managing Partner of Strategic Research Institute, President of Global Investment and Merchant Banking at Prudential Securities, and investment banking at Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co. He currently serves on the board and is Chairman ofshareholders. Accordingly, the Audit Committee of Core Molding Technologies, is onhas recommended, subject to ratification by the board of trusteesstockholders, that KPMG serve as the Company’s independent auditors for the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation, and has served on a number of educational andnot-for-profit boards. Mr. Crowley has a master’s degree in Business Administrationfiscal year ending December 31, 2024. Representatives from the Wharton Graduate School of BusinessKPMG are expected to be present virtually at the University of PennsylvaniaAnnual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Villanova University. He hasstatement if they desire to do so. Such representatives are also completed corporate governance programs at the Harvard Business School, Stanford Graduate Business School, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University. Mr. Crowley is qualifiedexpected to serve as a director because he possesses the requisite education and business acumenbe available to serve as an audit committee financial expert along with having served on other boards and as an audit committee chairman of another company.

GENE EDWARDS, 61, a director since June 2014, also serves on the Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Edwards served as Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of Valero Energy Corporation until his retirement in April 2014. He began his32-year career at Valero as an analyst in Planning and Economics and spent his tenure with Valero in various managerial positions in Planning and Economics, Refinery Operations, Business Development, and Marketing. Mr. Edwards was a key driver in Valero’s entry into the ethanol business and helped the segment become a successful part of its overall business. He served on the board of directors of CST Brands, Inc. from May 2013respond to December 2013. Mr. Edwards holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from Tulane University and a master’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas at San Antonio. Mr. Edwards is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive energy, including ethanol, industry experience, providing the appropriate questions.

Board with valued industry experience.

GORDON GLADE, 47, a director since December 2007, also serves on the Audit and the Nominating and Governance Committees. Mr. Glade is currently a shareholder of Amur Equipment Financing (formerly AXIS Capital Inc.), a commercial equipment leasing company, for which he had also served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 1996 to 2016. In addition, he is a current investor in several other ethanol companies. Mr. Glade also serves as Vice President and a director of the Edgar and Frances Reynolds Foundation, Inc. and as a director of Heartland Agriculture, LLC and the Brunswick State Bank. Mr. Glade has a Bachelor of Science degree in both Accounting and Finance from Texas Christian University. Mr. Glade is qualified to serve as a director because his business experience, including his experience as an investor in other ethanol companies, provides the Board with valuable perspective.

Continuing Directors with Terms Expiring in 2020

JIM ANDERSON, 60, a director since October 2008, also serves on the Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Anderson is currently the Chief Executive Officer ofMoly-Cop, a position he has held since November 2017. Previously, he served as Managing Director and Operating Partner at CHAMP Private Equity. In addition, he served The Gavilon Group, LLC as its President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2014 until February 2016 as well as its Chief Operating Officer, Fertilizer, since February, 2010. From September 2006 to February 2010, he served as Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors at United Malt Holdings, a producer of malt for use in the brewing and distilling industries. Prior to that, beginning in April 2003, Mr. Anderson served as Chief Operating Officer / Executive Vice President of CT Malt, a joint venture between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Tiger Brands of South Africa. Mr. Anderson’s experience in the agricultural processing and trading business includes serving as Senior Vice President and then President of ConAgra Grain Companies. His career also includes association with the firm Ferruzzi USA and as an Operations Manager for Pillsbury Company. He has also served as a Board Member of the North American Export Grain Association and the National Grain and Feed Association. Mr. Anderson holds a Bachelor of Arts degree with a Finance emphasis from the University of Wisconsin - Platteville. Mr. Anderson is qualified to serve as a director because of his commodity experience and agribusiness knowledge, which provides the Board with a relevant depth of understanding of our operations.

WAYNE HOOVESTOL, 60, a director since March 2006, has served as Chairman of the Board since October 2008. Mr. Hoovestol served as our Chief Operating Officer from January 2007 to February 2007, Chief Executive Officer from February 2007 to December 2008, and Chief Strategy Officer from March 2009 to November 2009. Mr. Hoovestol no longer is an employee of the company. Mr. Hoovestol began operating Hoovestol Inc., a trucking company, in 1978. He is also President of Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, which he founded in 2005. Mr. Hoovestol became involved with the ethanol industry as an investor in 1995, and has served on the boards of two other ethanol companies. Mr. Hoovestol also served on the board of CapSource Financial, Inc., a truck trailer sales and leasing company, from May 2005 to March 2007. Mr. Hoovestol is qualified to serve as a director because of his former leadership as Chief Executive Officer, as well as the business perspective he brings to the Board through his ownership of other entities and investments in other ethanol companies.

EJNAR KNUDSEN, 49, joined the company as a director in May 2016. He also serves on the Audit Committee. Mr. Knudsen is the founder and CEO of AGR Partners, and oversees the firm’s strategy with investments totaling over $400 million in food processors, manufacturers and agribusinesses. From 2009 to 2012, Mr. Knudsen wasco-portfolio manager of Passport Capital’s Agriculture Fund. Prior to Passport Capital, Mr. Knudsen served as EVP of Western Milling, a grain and feed milling company that grew from a small California startup to over $1 billion in sales. Mr. Knudsen also spent 10 years with Rabobank, in its New York office, managing a loan portfolio and venture capital investments as well as providing corporate advisory services. Mr. Knudsen is a director of Opal Foods, Icicle Seafoods, Ridley Corp. (RIC.ASX), and Materra Farming. Mr. Knudsen received his B.S. from Cornell University and is a CFA charter holder. Mr. Knudsen is qualified to serve as a director because of his operating company and finance experience, as well as his agribusiness industry network and knowledge, which provides the Board with a relevant depth of understanding of our operations.

Required Vote

To be elected, each nominee for director must receive plurality of all votes cast (assuming a quorum is present) with respect to that nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker��non-votes” will not be counted as a vote cast with respect to a nominee.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR”for the ratification of KPMG for the 2024 fiscal year.


AUDIT MATTERS37
Independence of Auditors
We have adopted policies and procedures for pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor. It is our policy that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit, tax and other non-audit services. A proposal for audit or non-audit services must include a description and purpose of the services, estimated fees and other terms of the services. To the extent a proposal relates to non-audit services, a determination that such services qualify as permitted non-audit services and an explanation as to why the provision of such services would not impair the independence of the independent auditor are also required.
All the services provided by KPMG during 2023 and 2022 were approved in advance by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the services performed by our principal accountant is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Auditors’ Fees
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, KPMG LLP was our independent auditor. The following table sets forth aggregate fees billed to us, including fees related to services rendered for Green Plains Partners LP, for professional services rendered by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:
20232022
Audit Fees$3,315,460 $2,679,500 
Audit Related Fees
Tax Fees58,865 93,000 
All Other Fees
Total$3,374,325 $2,772,500 
Audit Fees. Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our other filings with the SEC, and other fees that are normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Fees incurred in 2023 include consent fees associated with the merger of Green Plains Partners LP.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees are for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, other than those previously reported under audit fees. There were no audit-related fees billed by KPMG in 2023 or 2022.
Tax Fees. Tax fees are for professional services, approved by the Audit Committee in advance, rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees. All other fees include other products and services that are not otherwise disclosed. There were no other fees billed by KPMG in 2023 or 2022.


38
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, currently consists of Messrs. Salinas (Chairman) and Treuer and Ms. Wagner, each of whom is independent under the nominees set forthrules of the NASDAQ and the SEC. Mr. Salinas has been determined to be an audit committee financial expert as defined in Proposal 1.

Rule 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

OUR MANAGEMENT

Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and to issue reports thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023, which has primary responsibility for the financial statements. KPMG, the Company’s independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2023, is responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee met with KPMG and company management to discuss the Company’s financial reports. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by AS 1301 Communication with Audit Committees, as may be modified or supplemented. Additionally, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required to be delivered to them under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding communications concerning independence, and the Audit Committee considered whether KPMG maintained its independence during the year ended December 31, 2023. Based on these discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the year ended on December 31, 2023.
Respectfully submitted,
Martin Salinas Jr., Chairman
Alain Treuer
Kimberly Wagner


39
Executive Officers and Directors

Our executive officers, and directors, their ages and their positions as of March 29, 2018,13, 2024, are as follows. Our executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board.

 NAME

Image_123.jpg

AGE      

TITLE

 Wayne Hoovestol

60

Chairman of the Board

Todd A. Becker,

52

58
President and Chief Executive Officer (and Director)

 John W. Neppl

52

Chief Financial Officer

 Jeffery S. Briggs

53

Chief Operating Officer and President, Green Plains Ethanol

 Michelle S. Mapes

51

Chief Legal and Administration Officer

 George P. (Patrich) Simpkins

56

Chief Development Officer

 Walter S. Cronin

55

Executive Vice President – Commercial Operations

 Mark A. Hudak

58

Executive Vice President – Human Resources

 Paul E. Kolomaya

52

Executive Vice President – Commodity Finance

 Michael A. Metzler

55

Executive Vice President – Natural Gas & Power

 Kenneth M. Simril

52

President – Fleischmann’s Vinegar

 Anthony R. Vojslavek

36

Executive Vice President – Risk Management

 Jim Anderson(1) (2) (4)

60

Director

 James Crowley(1) (4)

71

Director

 Gene Edwards(1) (2) (4)

61

Director

 Gordon Glade(1) (3)

47

Director

 Ejnar Knudsen(1)

49

Director

 Thomas Manuel(2) (3)

71

Director

 Brian Peterson(3)

54

Director

 Alain Treuer(2) (3)

45

Director

1.Member of the Audit Committee.
2.Member of the Compensation Committee
3.Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
4.In accordance with requirements of the SEC and the NASDAQ listing requirements, the Board has designated each as an Audit Committee financial expert.

Biographical information for Todd A. Becker, who also serves as one of our directors, is provided above inon Page 16 of this Proxy Statement. Since March 2015, the majority of our executive officers serve the general partner of GPP in the same capacity as noted below. Under an operational services and secondment agreement, we are reimbursed by GPP for certain compensation of our employees, including executive officers, who serve in management, maintenance and operational functions in support of its operations. Messrs. Briggs and Simpkins have also served as directors of the general partner of GPP since June 2015.

JOHN NEPPL has served as Statement

pg38_pic-starkj.jpg
James E. Stark, 62
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer since September 2017. PriorOctober 2022
Re-joined Green Plains in January 2022 after serving as Vice-President, Investors Relations at Darling Ingredients since 2019
Vice President Investor and Media Relations from February 2009 to joining our parent, Mr. Neppl served as Chief Financial Officer of The Gavilon Group, LLC, an agriculture and energy commodities management firm with an extensive global footprint, from June 2008 through February 2016. Previously, Mr. Neppl heldDecember 2019
Served in various senior financial and commercial executive roles and has over 30 years of corporate communications, finance and logistical management positions at ConAgra Foods, Inc., including Senior Financial Officer of ConAgra Trade Group and Commercial Products division as well as Assistant Corporate Controller. Prior to ConAgra, Mr. Neppl was Corporate Controller at Guarantee Life Companies. He began his career as an auditor with Deloitte & Touche. Mr. Neppl isexperience
Has a member of the Creighton University Heider College of Business Dean’s Advisory Board, as well as its Accounting Department Advisory Board. In addition, he is on the Board of Directors of Marian High School in Omaha, Nebraska and Chair of its Finance Committee. Mr. Neppl earned his Bachelor of Science degree in business administration with a major in accounting from Creighton University. He is also a certified public accountant (inactive status).

JEFF BRIGGS has served as Chief Operating Officer and President, Green Plains Ethanol and since January 2018 and prior to that as Chief Operating Officer since November 2009. Mr. Briggs served as a consultant to us from July 2009 to November 2009. Prior to his consulting role, he was Founder and General Partner of Frigate Capital, LLC, a private investment partnership investing in small andmid-sized companies, from January 2004 through January 2009. Prior to Frigate, Mr. Briggs spent nearly seven years at Valmont Industries, Inc. as President of the Coatings Division. Prior to Valmont, he acquired and managed an electronic manufacturing company; was Director of Mergers and Acquisitions for Peter Kiewit and Sons; worked for Goldman Sachs in their Equities Division; and served five years as an Officer in the U.S. Navy. Mr. Briggs has a master’sMaster's degree in Business Administration from the Harvard Business SchoolUniversity of Phoenix and a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering, ThermalEconomics from the University of Texas

pg38_pic-herbertj.jpg
James F. Herbert II, 50
Chief Human Resource Officer
Chief Human Resources Officer since October 2022
Vice President Finance and Power SystemsOperations for Capstone IT from UCLA.

MICHELLE MAPES has served as 2018 to 2022

Held various HR leadership roles at Union Pacific Railroad from 2007 to 2018, including Assistant Vice President - HR Training and Development, Assistant Vice President - Human Resources and Assistant Vice President - Operations


Holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with an emphasis in Marketing and HR Management from the University of Nebraska at Omaha
Also holds a Master's degree in Business Administration from the University of Nebraska Omaha and a Master of Science in Negotiations and Dispute Resolution from Creighton University School of Law


40
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
pg39_pic-kadavyg.jpg
Grant D. Kadavy, 48
Executive Vice President Commercial Operations
Executive Vice President – Commercial Operations since October 2022
Held various executive positions at Darigold from 2016 to 2022, including Chief Commercial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Growth and Risk Officer
He also held various roles at Cargill from 1997 to 2016, including President of Cargill Americas and General Director, Mexico
Holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Communication from St. Olaf College
Image_126.jpg
Michelle S. Mapes, 57
Chief Legal and Administration Officer and Corporate Secretary
Chief Legal and Administration Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 2018 and prior
Board member of Green Plains Holdings LLC from November 2021 to that as January 2024
Executive Vice President – General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since November 2009. Prior to joining Green Plains in September 2009

as and General Counsel Ms. Mapes was a from September 2009 to 2018

Partner at Husch Blackwell LLP from 2006 to 2009, where for three years she focused her legal practice nearlyalmost exclusively in renewable energy. Prior to that, she was energy
Serves on the Board and Executive Committee of the National Feed & Grain Association
Serves on the CFTC's Agricultural Advisory Committee
Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel for HDM Corporation. Ms. Mapes served as Corporation from 2005 to 2006
Senior Vice President – Corporate Services and General Counsel for Farm Credit Services of America from April 2000 to June 2005. Ms. Mapes holds2005
Holds a Juris Doctorate, a master’sMaster’s degree in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and Finance, all from the University of Nebraska – Lincoln.

PATRICH SIMPKINS has served as Lincoln


Image_128.jpg
Chris G. Osowski, 45
Executive Vice President – Operations and Technology
Executive Vice President – Operations and Technology since January 2022
Vice President Global Technology at ADM from August 2020 to December 2021
General Director, Aston Startch Products, an ADM joint venture in Moscow, from July 2018 to August 2020
Director – India Operations, New Delhi at ADM from February 2015 to February 2017
Held several other senior level positions at ADM from August 2013 to January 2015
Held several senior level positions at Tate & Lyle from August 2008 to August 2013
Production Support Manager at Renewable Energy Group from March 2007 to August 2008
Technical Manager at Poet from September 2003 to March 2007
Has a Master's degree in Business Administration from Minnesota State University and a Bachelor of Science degree in Agriculture and Biosystems Engineering from North Dakota State University


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS41
Image_124.jpg
G. Patrich Simpkins Jr., 62
Chief Transformation Officer
Chief Transformation Officer since October 2022
Chief Financial Officer from May 2019 to October 2022
Board member of Green Plains Holdings LLC from June 2015 to January 2024
Chief Development Officer sincefrom October 2014 also previously servicing as to May 2019
Chief Risk Officer from October 2014 through August 2016. Prior to joining Green Plains in May 2012 as October 2016
Executive Vice President – Finance and Treasurer Mr. Simpkins was from May 2012 to October 2014
Managing Partner of GPS Capital Partners, LLC, a capital advisory firm serving global energy and commodity clients. From February 2005clients, from 2008 to June 2008, he served as 2011
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of SensorLogic, Inc., and as from 2005 to 2008
Executive Vice President and Global Chief Risk Officer of TXU Corporation from November 2001 to June 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Simpkins served2004
Served in senior financial and commercial executive roles with Duke Energy Corporation, Louis Dreyfus Energy, MEAG Power Company and MCI Communications. Mr. Simpkins hasCommunications
Has a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Economics and Marketing from the University of Kentucky.

WALTER CRONIN has served as Kentucky


05_429139-1_pic_nominees.jpg
Leslie van der Meulen, 46
Executive Vice President – Product Marketing and Innovation
Executive Vice President – Commercial Operations since August 2015. Mr. Cronin served as Chief Investment Officer of Green Plains Asset Management LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains, from November 2011 to August 2015. Mr. Cronin served as Executive Vice President and trading principal of County Cork Asset Management from April 2010 to November 2011, and as a consultant to Bunge Limited from September 2004 to March 2010. Prior to that, he gained over 28 years of commodity trading experience working at a number of firms, including R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC and Continental Grain Company. Mr. Cronin has a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Santa Clara.

MARK HUDAK has served as Executive Vice President – Human Resources since November 2013. Prior to joining Green Plains in January 2013 as Vice President – Human Resources, Mr. Hudak served as Senior Director, Global Human Resources for Bimbo Bakeries from November 2010 to January 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Hudak was Vice President, Global Human Resources / Compliance and Ethics Officer at United Malt Holdings from September 2006 to November 2010. He held several senior level positions at ConAgra Foods, Inc. from December 2000 to September 2006. Mr. Hudak has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Bellevue University.

PAUL KOLOMAYA has served as Executive Vice President – Commodity Finance since February 2012. Prior to joining Green Plains in August 2008 as Vice President – Commodity Finance, Mr. Kolomaya was employed by ConAgra Foods, Inc. from March 1997 to August 2008 in a variety of senior finance and accounting capacities, both domestic and international. Prior to that, he was employed by Arthur Andersen & Co. in both the audit and business consulting practices. Mr. Kolomaya holds chartered accountant and certified public accountant certifications and has a Bachelor of Honors Commerce degree from the University of Manitoba.

MICHAEL METZLER has served as Executive Vice President – Natural Gas and Power since November 2015. Prior to joining Green Plains in May 2013 as Senior Vice President and General Manager – Natural Gas and Power, Mr. Metzler was Senior Vice President of Origination and Trading for Tenaska Marketing Ventures, spending nearly 20 years helping to build the company from its start up. Prior to Tenaska, he spent five years with Aquila Energy Marketing as Director ofProduct Marketing and Trading. Mr. Metzler holds a BachelorInnovation since May 2021

Responsible for the Company’s subsidiary Optimal Aquafeed, deployment of Business Administration degree in ManagementClean Sugar Technology™ and Marketing from the University of Nebraska - Omaha.

KENNETH SIMRIL has served as President – Fleischmann’s VinegarShell Fiber Conversion Technology collaboration with Shell

Held various roles with the Company since October 2016, a position which he has held since June 2006, prior to the company’s acquisition of Fleischmann’s Vinegar. Ken has an established record of successful venture2013, focusing on innovation, animal nutrition and product development with a career that spans multinationals,start-up’s and private equity backed ventures. He has more than 20
Has 25+ years of experience as a senior-level executive in planning, building and leadingstart-up ventures, including billion dollar initiatives with various multi-national corporations such as ExxonMobil and Level 3 Communications. Mr. Simril holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering from the University of Southern California and a Master’s Degree of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

ANTHONY VOJSLAVEK has served as Executive Vice President – Risk Management since August 2016. Prior to joining Green Plains, Mr. Vojslavek was employed by The Gavilon Group LLC from November 2010 to August 2016, serving as Chief Risk Officer and Vice President, Senior Director – Risk Management and various other risk management leadership positions. Mr. Vojslavek started his career with ConAgra Foods, working in the Treasuryglobal marketing and Risk Solutions group. Mr. Vojslavek earned a master’s degreesales of Business Administration from Creighton Universityvalue-added products, focused on both human and a Bacheloranimal nutrition



42
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Executive Compensation
Proposal 3  
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
The say-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on our Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of our stockholders and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote and take into consideration any concerns raised by stockholders when determining future compensation arrangements.
The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” our executive compensation plan set forth in Proposal 3.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of Science degree2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in Economics from Washington University in St. Louis.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,

the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal. At our 2023 annual meeting, our stockholders supported an annual frequency for this advisory vote. As such, the Board has determined that our Company will hold this advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers each year.
As described in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals and to align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance above established goals with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, beginning on page 43, for a more detailed discussion of our executive compensation program, including information about fiscal year 2023 compensation of our NEOs.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This say-on-pay proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” adoption of the following resolution at the Annual Meeting.
Vote Required
Approval of the above resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by shares of Common Stock present in person (online) or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter (assuming a quorum is present). Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, do not count as votes cast "for" or "against" Proposal 3.
Board Recommendation
The Board recommends that stockholders vote for our executive compensation plan.


  EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

16          

   COMPENSATION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY

22          

   ROLES OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, MANAGEMENT AND INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS

23          

   USE OF PEER COMPANIES IN SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND MEASURING PERFORMANCE

24          

   MIX OF SALARY AND INCENTIVE AWARDS (AT TARGET)

25          

   COMPONENTS OF FISCAL 2017 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

26          43

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion and analysis containscontain statements regarding future individual and company performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our company’sCompany’s compensation programs and are not statements of management’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance.

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the key features of our executive compensation program and the Compensation Committee’s approach in deciding fiscal 20172023 compensation for our named executive officers (our NEOs)(NEOs):

NAME

TITLE

pg44_photo-beckert.jpg
pg44_photo-starkj.jpg
05_429139-1_photo_cda_kadavyg.jpg
pg44_photo-mapesm.jpg
pg44_photo-simpkinsp.jpg
Todd A.
Becker

President and
Chief Executive Officer (and
Director)
John W. Neppl
James E.
Stark

Chief Financial
Officer
Jerry L. Peters(1)Former Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth M. SimrilPresident - Fleischmann’s Vinegar
Jeffrey S. BriggsChief Operating Officer and President, Green Plains Ethanol
Carl S. (Steve) Bleyl(2)Former
Grant D.
Kadavy
Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing- Commercial Operations
Michelle S.
Mapes

Chief Legal and Administration
Officer and
Corporate
Secretary
G. Patrich
Simpkins Jr.

Chief
Transformation
Officer

(1)Effective September 11, 2017, Mr. Peters retired as Chief Financial Officer.
(2)Effective December 31, 2017, Mr.  Bleyl retired as Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing

Executive Overview

RESPONSE TO SAY ON PAY ADVISORY VOTE

At our 2017

The NEOs’ payouts under the 2023 annual meeting, 76%incentive program considered the Company’s financial results, safety performance, achievement of our shareholders approved our say on pay proposal. We were gratified bykey strategic initiatives and individual performance in 2023. As described further in the passing vote, but recognize thatCompensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), the approval percentage was not at a level we deemed acceptable. As a result, management engaged with two proxy advisory firms and the feedback received was strongly supportive of the changes to our executive compensation program, that had been made for 2017. The committee,through the use of equity-based awards, aligns the NEOs’ realizable compensation with input from its independent compensation consultant, further considered the 2017 vote results and current market practices and introduced additional changes for 2018.

The committee and the Board value input from our shareholders and will carefully consider the results of the current say on pay vote, which is the first to fully reflect the changes to the compensation program, and will continue to seek direct feedback from shareholders.

Fiscal 2017 Compensation Program Improvements

In response to the results of previous say on pay votes and shareholder and proxy advisor feedback, our NEO compensation program was significantly amended to enhance alignment between executive compensation and the interestsperformance of our shareholders, as follows:

SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO SAY ON PAY VOTES AND INVESTOR FEEDBACK

WHAT WE HEARD

ACTIONS TAKEN

EFFECTIVE

STARTING

Special Awards

  Special awards should be reserved for limited circumstances

  Special awards will only be made to compensate new hires for equity they forfeit at their former employer or for targeted retention for critical and at risk executives. Where special awards are made for retention purposes, they will vest over a longer period of time.

FY 2018

Plan Design

  A meaningful portion of the executive officers’ long-term incentive program (LTIP) should vest based on performance

  Beginning in 2018, one half of awards to executive officers under the LTIP will be in the form of performance share units (PSUs) which vest based on the attainment ofpre-established performance goals.

FY 2018

  Market preference toward forward-looking performance measurement for LTIP

  We have shifted from a backward-looking/trailing performance measurement to aforward-looking performance measurement for our LTIP, with PSUs earned at the end of a three year performance period based 12 on total shareholder return relative to a performance peer group and 12 based on the company’s return on net assets (RONA).

  Eliminate excise taxgross-up provisions

  Mr. Becker agreed to an amendment to his employment agreement to eliminate the excise taxgross-ups provision regarding change in control benefits that had been in his agreement for a number of years.

  Adopt a clawback policy

  We adopted a compensation recovery (clawback) policy to allow the Board to recover annual or long-term incentive awards in connection with a material financial restatement resulting from executive misconduct.

  Market preference toward consideration of total shareholder return (TSR) in incentive payouts

  We granted PSUs, which utilize a relative TSR measure, weighted 50%, to further align our NEOs’ interests with shareholder interests and expectations.

Separate metrics in incentive plans

  We adopted separate metrics for our annual incentive bonus and LTIP programs.

Support for financial performance metrics that can be reconciled to peers easily and align pay for performance vs. peer group

  We have adopted RONA as a measure for our PSUs, given the importance of our returns to long-term shareholder value creation.

  Peer group update

  We re-evaluated our peer group to better align with our company following the completion of acquisitions and business evolution and introduced a new performance peer group for use with PSU awards.

FY 2016 and
FY 2018

No immediate vesting of equity awards under LTIP

  We eliminated the immediate vesting of 25% of equity awards under our LTIP. Restricted share units (RSUs) vest 1/3 on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date and PSUs, if earned, cliff vest at the end of a three year performance period.

FY 2015

  Stock ownership guidelines

  We have stock ownership guidelines and we have always prohibited stock pledging, as well as hedging, transactions, unless the Board grants an exception.

FY 2011

CEO Compensation

Concern with level of CEO target and maximum bonus opportunity

Moved towards a more typical compensation mix for 2018, increasing the CEO’s base salary, but maintaining a below market median salary and reducing his target annual incentive to 200% of salary and maximum annual incentive to 2x the target bonus.

Proxy Design

Provide an executive summary in the Proxy Statement and discuss responsiveness to shareholder feedback

  We haveimproved our proxy disclosures by including a proxy summary and an executive summary at the beginning of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy Statement.

  We haveexpanded disclosures on our shareholder input, practices, governance and ESG matters.

FY 2017
stock price.

We will continue to solicit shareholder feedback on our executive compensation program by holding an advisory say on pay vote on an annual basisCompensation Objectives and will take the results of this process into account in evaluating the program and making future compensation decisions for the NEOs.

BEST PRACTICES AND GOOD GOVERNANCE

In addition to the significant changes made in response to the 2017 say on pay vote, the committee also made several other changes to the 2017 and 2018 executive compensation programs after reviewing trends in executive compensation andpay-related governance policies. These changes follow several years of executive compensation program enhancements by the committee as summarized in the table above.

COMPANY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Philosophy

Our Business

Green Plains is an Iowa corporation, founded in June 2004 as an ethanol producer. We have grown through acquisitions of operationally efficient ethanol production facilities and adjacent commodity processing businesses. We are focused on generating stable operating margins through our diversified business segments and risk management strategy. We own and operate assets throughout the ethanol value chain: upstream, with grain handling and storage; through our ethanol production facilities; and downstream, with marketing and distribution services to mitigate commodity price volatility, which differentiates us from companies focused only on ethanol production. Our other businesses, including our partnership, cattle feeding operations and vinegar production, leverage our supply chain, production platform and expertise.

We formed Green Plains Partners LP, a master limited partnership, to be our primary downstream storage and logistics provider since its assets are the principal method of storing and delivering the ethanol we produce. The partnership completed its IPO on July 1, 2015. We own a 62.5% limited partner interest, a 2.0% general partner interest and all of the partnership’s incentive distribution rights. The public owns the remaining 35.5% limited partner interest. The partnership is consolidated in our financial statements.

We group our business activities into the following four operating segments to manage performance:

Ethanol Production.  Our ethanol production segment includes the production of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil at 17 ethanol plants in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. At capacity, our facilities are capable of processing approximately 518 million bushels of corn per year and producing approximately 1.5 billion gallons of ethanol, 4.1 million tons of distillers grains and 359 million pounds of industrial grade corn oil, making us the second largest consolidated owner of ethanol plants in North America.

Agribusiness and Energy Services.  Our agribusiness and energy services segment includes grain procurement, with approximately 59.6 million bushels of grain storage capacity, and our commodity marketing business, which markets, sells and distributes ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil produced at our ethanol plants. We also market ethanol for a third-party producer as well as buy and sell ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, crude oil, grain, natural gas and other commodities in various markets.

Food and Ingredients.  Our food and ingredients segment includes four cattle feeding operations with the capacity to support approximately 258,000 head of cattle and grain storage capacity of approximately 9.6 million bushels, Fleischmann’s Vinegar, one of the world’s largest producers of food-grade industrial vinegar, and our food-grade corn oil operations.

Partnership.  Our master limited partnership provides fuel storage and transportation services by owning, operating, developing and acquiring ethanol and fuel storage tanks, terminals, transportation assets and other related assets and businesses. The partnership’s assets include 39 ethanol storage facilities, eight fuel terminal facilities and approximately 3,500 leased railcars.

2017 Business Highlights

Fiscal 2017 presented a challenging operating environment, as our business continued to experience the impacts of a continued deflationary cycle within the agriculture sector and continued pricing pressure from increased global supplies of grains, proteins and oilseeds. As a result, and primarily due to weak ethanol margins, we did not achieve the EBITDA goal under our short-term incentive plan and our 2017 bonus payouts, which for the NEOs that were employed for the entire year, ranged from 43% to 57% of each NEO’s target bonus.

Despite these challenging operating conditions, we continued to execute on our business strategies by managing commodity price risks, improving operational efficiencies and optimizing market opportunities to create an efficient platform with diversified income streams, as exemplified by the following:

2017 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Key Operating Accomplishments

Net income of $61.1 million, or $1.47 per diluted share.

Produced 1.3 billion gallons of ethanol, a 9.5% increase over 2016.

EBITDA of $154.4 million (see EBITDA reconciliation in the company’s Form10-K, filed February 14, 2018).

With weaker ethanol margins during fiscal year 2017, we continue to manage our ethanol production and are well poised as both domestic and global demand continues to rise.

Growth Achievements

Completed acquisitions of cattle-feed operations located in Hereford, Texas, Leoti, Kansas and Eckley, Colorado bringing the company’s total capacity to 258,000 head of cattle and making us the 4th largest feedlot operator in the U.S.

Along with our joint-venture partner, Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Partner’s, commenced commercial operations at the intermodal export and import fuels terminal in Beaumont, Texas.

Entered into a $500 million term loan agreement, which matures on August 29, 2023, to refinance $405 million of existing debt.

Repurchased $6.7 million of the company’s Common Stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program.

Pay for Performance

The committeeCompensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay in alignment withthat reflects corporate, business unit and individual performance primarily based onthat also aligns with the following three factors, which in turn are expected to align executive pay with returns to shareholders over time:

Expansiontransformation plans of the Company for the creation of our company, both organically and through acquisitions, within the context of the business cycle, as our scale creates the platform for future growth and influences the stability of our company’s earnings;

The company’s return on net assets (RONA); and

The total shareholder return of our company as compared to our Performance Peer Group.

We have diversified our business significantly during the last few years and remain a growth-oriented company focused on creating long-term value for our shareholders. However, deflationary cycles within the global commodity markets can have a significant impact on the priceAs part of our Common Stock. As such,compensation philosophy, we believepay executive salaries that are competitive with the current best indicatormajority of our long-term performance is TSR versus our Performance Peer Group as well as performance of our RONA against our internal goals set by our Board. The other primary factor in aligning our pay and performance is whether we have remained a growth-oriented company as measured by EBITDA performance for both our ethanol andnon-ethanol businesses.

Performance againstpre-established EBITDA goals was a key element of our 2017 annual incentive plan. In the last several years, we have used key acquisitions and a joint venture project to transform our platform and build future valuecompensation being “at-risk” through segment and product diversification. Consistent EBITDA growth will result in greater annual incentive plan payouts, while shortfalls in EBITDA will result in below target payouts. As the chart below indicates, our CEO’s total bonus payout is well-aligned with our EBITDA performance.

LOGO

YEAR 2015  2016  2017 

CEO Pay Measure:

            

Annual Bonus Payout

     $1,500          $1,813          $670     

% Change

      +21%   -63% 

Absolute Performance Measure:

            

EBITDA(non-GAAP)

     $      127.8      $      174.4      $      154.4 

The following chart details our CEO’s realizable compensation compared to his target compensation for each of the years ended 2015, 2016 and 2017. We believe this chart demonstrates that our CEO’s compensation is, as intended, largely at risk and closely and appropriately linked to performance, including the performance of our stock price.

LOGO

(1)Target compensation is defined as (i) base salary, (ii) the target annual incentive opportunity for the year, and (iii) the value as of grant date of RSUs granted during each year.
(2)Realizable compensation is defined as (i) base salary, (ii) the actual annual incentive earned for the year, and (iii) the value as of December 31, 2017 of RSUs granted during each year. The realizable value of RSUs is based on our closing stock price on December 29, 2017 of $16.85 per share.

The committee believes that our executive compensation program effectively aligns pay with performance based on the key factors discussed above, thereby aligning executive pay with returns to shareholders and creating a growth-oriented, long-term value proposition for our shareholders.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay in alignment with corporate, business unit and individual performance. A large portion of total direct compensation is“at-risk” through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive and long-term equity awards. These awards are linkedOur annual cash incentive plan provides an incentive to actual performance and include a significant portion of equity. See charts on page 25 for more information regarding the target annual compensation mix for our CEO and other NEO’s.

Ongoing Monitoring of Compensation Best Practices and Programs in a Dynamic Environment—Overview

Our company has undergone diversification in the business over the last several years. As a result, and in response to our 2017 say on pay vote, the committees conducted anin-depth analysis of our compensation and governance practices, including an enhanced shareholder outreach process and a thorough review of all aspects of our compensation strategies and program. This analysis resulted in significant changes to our compensation programs for fiscal 2017 (discussed above under Fiscal 2017 Compensation Program Improvements at page 17). The committee engaged in an ongoing review of our compensation practices and governance policies in 2017, and the solicitation of advice from the committee’s compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian).

Fiscal 2017 Compensation Actions at a Glance

The following summarizes the key compensation decisions for the NEOs for fiscal 2017:

Base salary: The annual rate of base salary for Mr. Becker and the other NEOs was not adjusted for 2017. However, Mr. Becker’s salary was increased for 2018 and his target annual incentive was correspondingly decreased, to maintain his target cash compensation at the same level as in 2017.

Annual Incentive Bonus: For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded annual bonuses, for the NEOs that were employed for the entire year, ranging from 43% to 57% of each NEOs target bonus. See the section entitled Annual Incentive Compensation for a complete discussion of our performance measures, targets and performance for 2017 and annual bonuses awarded by the Committee for the year.

Long-Term Incentive Awards: As part of the significant changes made to our executive compensation program for 2017 and beyond, we shifted from a backward-looking/trailing performance measurement to a forward-looking performance measurement for our LTIP. Accordingly, we discontinued our historical practice of issuing solely service-based RSUs based on trailing performance, and instead, in early 2018, each of the NEOs was granted a combination of PSUs and RSUs. 50% of each officer’s 2018 award opportunity was granted in PSUs and RSUs, respectively.

These compensation decisions are discussed in more detail in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and shown in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table that follows.

The Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan advances ourpay-for-performance philosophy by providing participants under the Incentive Plan with annual bonus incentive opportunities linked to the achievement of specific performance goals. The Incentive Plan is designed to:

Reinforce the company’s goal-setting and strategic planning process;
Recognize the efforts of its management in achievement objectives; and
Aid in attracting and retaining competent management, thus ensuring the long-range success of the company.

In the first quarter of each year, the Compensation Committee sets objective performance measures for the company as a whole and establishes corresponding performance goals for each participant under the Incentive Plan, including our NEOs. In structuring the performance measures and goals, the Compensation Committee sets targets for achieving those goals:

Minimum threshold before any annual performance bonus can be earned;
Target award dollar amount to incentivize a specific desired performance level; and
Maximum goal which sets an appropriate limit on the potential annual performance bonus that can be earned.

After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines whether the performance goals have been attained and approves any cash payment amount based upon the level of achievement of the annual performance goals. The Compensation Committee also evaluates each executive’s performance for the year and determines their overall cash performance bonus based on an assessment of their performance.

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s performance and accomplishments in the areas of business development, mergers & acquisitions, management succession, development and retention of senior management, leadership, and achievement ofachieve financial and operational objectives.

The Board and Compensation Committee have established the following objectives:

Leadership and company strategy;
Business performance and development;
Accomplishment of strategic objectives;
Commitment to development of management;
Growth initiatives; and
Financial and operational objectives.

The Board and Compensation Committee determined the CEO met the aforementioned objectivesaligned with the following accomplishments.

Green Plains had a strong operational performance in a difficult and volatile market and maximized its opportunities in terms of revenue growth and shareholder value for the year ending December 31, 2017;
Effective and strong leadership through communication and visibility with employee town hall meetings, investor conferences, customer functions, government regulations activities, and ongoing relationships with the Board on matters impacting Green Plains;
Continued the growth platform with additional activities around acquisitions;
Continue to drive a first class Health and Safety platform. GPI continues to be recognized as a leader in its industry;
Strengthened initiatives toward talent development of senior management, succession planning, and leadership development programs; and
Communicated regularly with the Boards of GPI and GPP and kept them advised of any related issues.

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

The Board and Compensation Committee determined the CFO met the aforementioned objectives with the following accomplishments.

Working with the senior leadership team, assisted in due diligence review of potential; acquisition targets, structuring ofour business GPP Conflict Committee review, purchase agreement issues and integration;
Completed a convertible note issuance to provide funding for the acquisitions completed. Coordinated underwriter selection, marketing, rating agency review, pricing and accounting. Also, closed a combined term/revolver loan for Fleischmann’s, a renewal of the GP Grain revolver, at lower pricing, and an upsizing of GPP’s revolver;
Managed balance sheet through a year of soft margins, providing the Board with financing alternatives under various dynamic scenarios. Maintained open communication with rating agencies to hold GPI’s current debt ratings in an environment with a very difficult first-half outlookplan and the significant acquisition activity;long-term strategy.
Managed all SEC filings to maintain compliance with regulations, including filing annual Proxy Statement, new shelf registrations for GPP and GPI, responding to SEC comment letter and completing Form 8K pro forma financial statements;


Maintained an active investor relations program for GPI and GPP. Coordinated proactive responses to industry issues, earnings reports, financial strategy questions and segment reporting; and

Evaluating possible acquisition of potential assets. Advised on structure, diligence, and valuation issues. Project was not completed based on our valuation and structuring concerns.

Chief Operating Officer (COO)

The Board and Compensation Committee determined the COO met the aforementioned objectives with the following accomplishments.

Target expansion projects and minimize capital expenditures to free cash flow as directed by the Board;
Continue to evaluate a high level growth project and support all diligence required. Evaluate production run rates and analyze capacity situation. Drive evaluation of protein opportunities;
Enhance farmer customer opportunities and leverage the Syngenta Enogen program;
Focus on yield enhancements and repair and maintenance cost evaluations. Lower cost production with repair and maintenance investment; and
Improve Environmental Health and Safety, Process Safety Management, and focus on U.S. Department of Transportation support. Improve internal reporting and training.

President Fleischmann’s Vinegar

The Board and Compensation Committee determined the President of Fleischmann’s Vinegar met the aforementioned objectives with the following accomplishments.

Drive financial performance, increase volume and increase selling price along with EBITDA;
Enhance east coast supply chain for apple cider customers;
Target operating cost reductions. Rail siding project, rail vs. truck initiative, and expected savings in lowering ethanol delivery costs;
Negotiatedtwo-year supply agreement with large customer and created an exclusive supplier arrangement;
Initiated the outsourcing of vinegar production, reviewing contractual and logistical matters; and
Continue to pursue growth opportunities via organic and acquisitions.

EVP Ethanol Marketing

The Board and Compensation Committee determined the EVP Ethanol Marketing met the aforementioned objectives with the following accomplishments.

Continue to develop a stronger marketing brand;
Continue to develop sales and customer relationships both domestically and internationally;
Expand trucking business, truck rack ethanol opportunities as well as created new truck cartage lanes;
Export ethanol opportunities, terminal and gulf business plan; and
Staff development and succession planning.

Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy

The committee has designed our executive compensation program to serve several key objectives:

44
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Our Core Compensation Principles
Competitive and Market Based:We attract and retain superior employees in key positions, with compensation opportunities that are competitive relative to the compensation paid to executives at companies similar to us by generally setting target levels of annual total direct compensation opportunity for the NEOs within a competitive range of the median of our Pay Levels Peer Group;

reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals; and

align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by placing a significant portion of total direct compensation at risk (90% for our CEO for 2017), and rewarding performance that exceeds that of our peer companies, through the use of equity-based LTIP awards and a share ownership and retention policy, with the ultimate objective of improving shareholder value over time.

In the chart below, we have summarized how the executive compensation program supports these executive compensation program objectives.

OBJECTIVE

PROGRAM DESIGN

Attract and retain superior employees in key positions, with compensation opportunities that are competitive relative to the compensation offered to similarly-situated executives at companies similar to us.

Designedthean executive compensation program designed to provide a mix of base salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target LTIPlong-term incentive program (LTIP) award values that are aligned with the program’s principles and objectivesCompany’s transformation plans and are competitive with the target compensation levels offered by our Pay Levels Peer Group.

Reward the
Balanced Short- and Long-Term Focus:We reward achievement of specific goals through our annual long-termincentive award and strategic goals.

Provided,LTIP awards, with approximately 90%88% of CEO 20172023 annual target total compensation in incentive compensation and on average, approximately 66%71% of all other NEO’sNEOs 2023 annual target compensation in incentive compensation.

compensation at risk.
Alignment with Shareholders:Our short and long-term awards are based on the transformational initiatives of the Company necessary to build shareholder value and are coupled with robust stock ownership guidelines. We further review our annual say-on-pay results from our shareholders in assessing our pay structures.

Providedsufficiently

Pay for Performance:We reward performance with quantifiable financial and operating initiatives, with sufficiently challenging upside opportunities on annual and long-term incentive compensation for exceeding target goals, balanced with reductions from target opportunities for performance below target goals.

Tiedpayouts We tie payouts under the annual incentive plan to key financial objectives, as well as strategic, operational and individual performance, to focus executives on areas over which they have the most direct impact, while continuing to motivate decision-making that is in the best interests of our companyCompany as a whole.

whole based on quantifiable performance goals established by the committee, with payouts determined after the committee reviews and certifies performance results. Performance awards, which comprise 50% of all long-term awards, are tied to three-year, forward-looking performance with vesting based on actual performance measured against performance goals established at the beginning of the performance period.
Pay for Performance
The committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay in alignment with corporate, business unit and individual performance primarily based on the following three factors, which in turn are expected to align executive pay with returns to shareholders over time:
Transformation of our Company, intended to create a platform delivering the stability of our Company’s earnings;
Achievement of key financial, operational and strategic objectives; and
The performance of our common stock.
The committee believes that our executive compensation program effectively aligns pay with performance based on the key factors discussed above, thereby aligning executive pay with returns to shareholders and creating a growth-oriented, long-term value proposition for our shareholders.
Executive Compensation Highlights
The committee has designed our executive compensation program to deliver pay in alignment with corporate, business unit and individual performance. A large portion of total direct compensation is “at-risk” through annual cash incentive and long-term equity awards. These awards are linked to actual performance and include a significant portion of equity. See charts on page 52 for more information regarding the target annual compensation mix for our CEO and other NEOs.
ONGOING MONITORING OF COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES AND PROGRAMS IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT—OVERVIEW
Our Company has undergone diversification in the business over the last several years. As a result, and in response to our annual say-on-pay vote, the committee regularly conducts analysis of our compensation practices, and a thorough review of all aspects of our compensation strategies and program with the independent compensation consultant.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION45
FISCAL 2023 COMPENSATION ACTIONS AT A GLANCE
The following summarizes the key compensation decisions for the NEOs for fiscal year 2023:
Base salary:The annual rate of base salaries of the CEO and other NEOs had no changes in 2023 or 2022, other than Mr. Stark who received a 14% increase effective March 1, 2023.
Annual Incentive Bonus: For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee awarded annual bonuses ranging from 45% to 81% of each NEO’s target bonus. See the Annual Incentive Compensation section for a complete discussion of our performance measures, targets and performance for 2023 and annual bonuses awarded by the Committee for the year.
Long-Term Incentive Awards:In March 2023, each of the NEOs was granted a combination of PSUs that cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and RSAs which vest ratably over three years. Moreover, the PSUs granted in February 2021, February 2022 and March 2023 are subject to performance goals aligned with the Company’s strategic objectives and shareholder interests.
These compensation decisions are discussed in more detail in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and shown in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table that follows.
2023 Performance Highlights
Began development of a novel Sustainable Aviation Fuel technology through a joint venture, Blue Blade Energy, with United Airlines and Tallgrass;
Successfully completed full scale 60% protein production runs using Fluid Quip Technologies’ MSC™ system combined with biological solutions;
Achieved record renewable corn oil yield across our platform;
First-ever commercial deployment of Clean Sugar Technology™ at Green Plains Shenandoah to begin commissioning during the first quarter of 2024;
Diversification of decarbonization strategy, with three Nebraska facilities committed to CCS anticipated to become operational in 2025, four Iowa and Minnesota facilities anticipated to be operational in 2026 on a separate CCS system;
Expanded protein sales to customers in North America, South America and Asia Pacific across multiple species;
Announced technology collaboration with Equilon Enterprises LLC to deploy Shell Fiber Conversion Technology, with construction nearing completion at Green Plains York; and
Completed acquisition of Green Plains Partners LP on January 9, 2024, with most of the efforts taking place during 2023.
Compensation Best Practices
In response to say-on-pay votes, best practices and investor input, we have implemented the following:
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  Special awards may be made to compensate new hires for equity they forfeit at their former employer or for targeted retention for critical and at-risk executives.
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  One-half of annual awards to executive officers under the LTIP is in the form of performance share units (PSUs) which vest based on the attainment of pre-established performance goals aligned to the long-term strategies of the Company.
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  We have a forward-looking performance measurement for our LTIP, with PSUs earned at the end of a three-year performance period.
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  We adopted a compensation recovery (clawback) policy to allow the Board to recover incentive compensation in connection with a material financial restatement.
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  We adopt separate metrics for our annual incentive bonus and LTIP programs.
pg47_graphic-bulletcheck.jpg  We have stock ownership guidelines, and we prohibit stock pledging, as well as hedging transactions, for executive officers.


46

Basedannual

GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
How We Make Compensation Decisions
Overview/Philosophy
The committee has designed our executive compensation program to serve several key objectives. In the chart below, we have summarized how the executive compensation program supports these executive compensation program objectives.
OBJECTIVEPROGRAM DESIGN
Attract and retain
superior employees in key positions, with compensation opportunities that are competitive relative to the compensation offered to similarly situated executives at companies similar to us.
Provide a mix of base salary, target annual cash incentive awards and target LTIP award values that are aligned with the program’s principles and objectives and are competitive with the target compensation levels offered by our Pay Levels Peer Group.
Retention agreements are put in place for executives' retention requiring repayment of certain awards if there is a departure prior to the end of the calendar year of the award.
Reward
the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals.
Provided approximately 88% of CEO 2023 annual target total compensation in incentive compensation and on average, approximately 71% of all other NEOs annual target compensation at risk, incentive compensation.
Provided sufficiently challenging upside opportunities on annual and long-term incentive compensation for exceeding target goals, balanced with reductions from target opportunities for performance below target goals.
Tied payouts under the annual incentive plan to key financial objectives, as well as strategic, operational and individual performance, to focus executives on areas over which they have the most direct impact, while continuing to motivate decision-making that is in the best interests of our Company as a whole.
Based annual incentive awards primarily on quantifiable performance goals established by the committee, at the beginning of the fiscal year, with payouts determined after the committee reviews and certifies performance results.

PSUsgranted

PSUs granted as part of LTIP are tied to three-year, forward lookingforward-looking performance with vesting based on actual performance measured against RONA and relative total shareholder returnperformance goals established at the beginning of the performance period.

Align the interests
of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by rewarding strong company performance that exceeds that of our peer companies, through the use of equity-based awards and a share ownership and retention policy, with the ultimate objective of improving shareholder value over time.

Tiedpayout

Tied payout of PSUs granted to our NEOs as part of LTIP to three-year, forward-looking performance based on RONA and total shareholder return relative to our Performance Peer Group.

Robuststockperformance goals consistent with the Company’s objectives.

Robust stock ownership guidelines.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION47

ROLES OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE, MANAGEMENT AND INDEPENDENT CONSULTANTS

Roles and Responsibilities
Compensation Committee

The committee has primary responsibility for overseeing our executive compensation program. The Board appoints the members of the committee. Each member of the committee is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the Board has determined that each member of the committee meets the applicable requirements for independence established by applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of the NASDAQ. The committee:

oversees our various compensation plans and programs and makes appropriate design decisions;

retains responsibility for monitoring our executive compensation plans and programs to ensure that they continue to adhere to our company’s compensation philosophy and objectives; and

determines the appropriate compensation levels for all executives, including the NEOs.

oversees our various compensation plans and programs and makes appropriate design decisions;
retains responsibility for monitoring our executive compensation plans and programs to ensure that they continue to adhere to our Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives; and
determines the appropriate compensation levels for all executives, including the NEOs.
The committee meets on a regular basis and has an executive session without members of management present at each regular committee meeting. The committee’s duties and responsibilities are described in its charter, which can be found on our website at http://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance.cfm.corporate-governance. The committee and the Board periodically review and, as appropriate, revise the charter.

As provided by its charter and discussed in greater detail below, the committee engages an independent compensation consultant to advise it on the design of our executive compensation program. The committee engaged MeridianPay Governance to advise it in connection with the 2017 executive compensation program and 2018 design.design in 2021. To determine the appropriate compensation levels, the committee considers, in conjunction with recommendations from its independent compensation consultant:

Total compensation paid to the NEOs;

Our company’s long-term and short-term strategic and financial objectives;

Our company’s performance, the industry in which we operate, the current operating environment, our relative total shareholder return performance and market compensation for similarly-situated executives; and

How to balance short-term and long-term compensation to provide fair near-term compensation, to align executive pay with long-term shareholder value, and to avoid structures that would encourage excessive risk taking.

Total compensation paid to the NEOs;

Our Company’s long-term and short-term incentive program design and alignment with strategic and financial objectives;
Our Company’s performance, the industry in which we operate, the current operating environment, our relative total shareholder return performance and market compensation for similarly situated executives; and
How to balance short-term and long-term compensation to provide fair near-term compensation, to align executive pay with long-term shareholder value, and to avoid structures that would encourage excessive risk taking.
The committee periodically reviews our executive compensation program to ensure that it remains competitive and provides the proper balance between cash and equity, and between short-term and long-term incentive compensation. The committee’s regular analysis and refinement of the compensation program ensures continuing alignment of the elements of the compensation program with our company’sCompany’s business strategy and shareholder interests. During this process, the committee:

Evaluates the design of our compensation program to align pay and performance;

Evaluates the executive compensation policies to ensure a continued nexus between executive compensation and the creation of shareholder value;

Seeks to ensure that our company’s compensation programs remain competitive, including comparing the total direct compensation paid by our company with that of our Peer Group;

Considers feedback received from our shareholders;

Consults as needed with its independent compensation consultant to review and refine the elements of our compensation programs to ensure that our executive compensation meets our stated objectives and is consistent with the company’s compensation philosophy; and

Takes into consideration appropriate corporate acquisitions, if any, and the resulting impact on the size and complexity of our company’s business.

Evaluates the design of our compensation program to align pay and performance;
Evaluates the executive compensation program to ensure a continued nexus between executive compensation and the creation of shareholder value;
Seeks to ensure that our Company’s compensation programs remain competitive, including comparing the total direct compensation paid by our Company with that of our Pay Levels Peer Group;
Considers feedback received from our shareholders;
Consults as needed with its independent compensation consultant to review and refine the elements of our compensation programs to ensure that our executive compensation meets our stated objectives, is consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy and aligns with contemporary market practice; and
Takes into consideration appropriate corporate transactions, if any, and the resulting impact on the size and complexity of our Company’s business.
In addition to its responsibilities for executive compensation plans and programs, the committee also evaluates and makes recommendations to the Board regarding our management and director compensation plans, policies and programs, and reviews benefit plans for management and other employees.



48
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Role of Chief Executive Officer

The committee evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer who, in turn, on an annual basis, reviews the performance of his direct reports, which include each of the NEOs other than himself. The Chief Executive Officer presents his conclusions and recommendations with respect to performance and pay, including recommendations with respect to base salary adjustments and incentive award amounts, to the committee. The committee considers this information and then exercises its judgment in adopting or modifying any recommended adjustments or awards to be made to the NEOs.

Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee’s charter allows the committee to engage an independent compensation consultant to advise the committee on the design of our executive compensation. For fiscal 2017,In 2021, the committeeCommittee engaged Meridian, anPay Governance as the independent executive compensation consulting firm, to provide advice to the committee on various factors relating to the development ofpeer groups, executive compensation benchmarking and our 2017short-term and long-term executive compensation program and 2018 design.

Meridian

Pay Governance is engaged directly by, and is fully accountable to, the committee.committee and does not provide advice to management. The committee has determined that MeridianPay Governance is independent based on the independence factors provided by the SEC and NASDAQ.
Consideration of Say-On-Pay Vote
At our 2023 annual meeting, our shareholders approved our NEOs’ compensation, with approximately 95% of the NASDAQ.

votes cast in favor of our say-on-pay proposal.

The committee and the Board value input from our shareholders and will carefully consider the results of the say-on-pay vote and will continue to seek direct feedback from shareholders.
Compensation Program Improvements
In response to the results of previous say-on-pay votes and shareholder and proxy advisor feedback and to better align our NEO compensation program with our business strategy, our compensation program has been modified over time to enhance the alignment between executive compensation and the interests of our shareholders, as follows:
SIGNIFICANT ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO SAY-ON-PAY VOTES AND INVESTOR FEEDBACK
WHAT WE HEARDACTIONS TAKENEFFECTIVE STARTING
Special Awards
Image_142.jpg Special awards should be reserved for limited circumstances
Image_143.jpg Special awards may be made to compensate new hires for equity they forfeit at their former employer or for targeted retention for critical and at-risk executives. Where special performance-based or retention awards are granted, they will generally vest over a longer period of time.
FY 2018
Plan Design
Image_144.jpg A meaningful portion of the executive officers’ LTIP should vest based on performance
Image_145.jpg One-half of annual awards to executive officers under the LTIP will be in the form of performance share units (PSUs) which vest based on the attainment of pre-established performance goals.
FY 2018


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION49
Image_146.jpg Market preference toward forward-looking performance measurement for LTIP
Image_147.jpg We have shifted from a backward-looking/trailing performance measurement to a forward-looking performance measurement for our LTIP, with PSUs earned at the end of a three-year performance period. The 2018 and 2019 PSUs vest 50% based on total shareholder return relative to a performance peer group and 50% based on the Company’s return on net assets (RONA). The 2020 PSUs vest based on achievement of key long-term measures associated with the transformation to Green Plains 2.0.
FY 2018
Image_148.jpg Eliminate excise tax gross-up provisions
Image_149.jpg Mr. Becker agreed to an amendment to his employment agreement to eliminate the excise tax gross-up provision regarding change in control benefits that had been in his agreement for a number of years.
FY 2018
Image_150.jpg Adopt a clawback policy
Image_151.jpg We adopted a compensation recovery (clawback) policy to allow the Board to recover annual or long-term incentive awards in connection with a material financial restatement. The policy was updated in November 2023 to require the Board to recoup certain executive incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting from material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements.
FY 2018
and
FY 2023
Image_152.jpg Market preference toward consideration of total shareholder return (TSR) in incentive payouts
Image_153.jpg We granted PSUs in 2018 and 2019, which utilize a relative TSR measure, weighted 50%, to further align our NEOs’ interests with shareholder interests and expectations.
FY 2018
Image_154.jpg Separate metrics in incentive plans
Image_155.jpg We adopted separate metrics for our annual incentive bonus and LTIP programs.
FY 2018
Image_156.jpg Peer group update
Image_157.jpg We re-evaluated our compensation benchmarking peer group to better align with our Company following the completion of acquisitions and business evolution and introduced a new performance peer group for use with PSU awards.
FY 2016,
FY 2018,
FY 2020,
FY 2021,
and
FY 2022
Image_156.jpg Stock ownership guidelines and Pledging Policy
Image_159.jpg We have stock ownership guidelines with detailed procedures and we have always prohibited stock pledging, as well as hedging, transactions, and any Board members granted an exception were revoked in 2021. No future exceptions will be allowed.
FY 2011
FY 2021
and
FY 2024
CEO Compensation
Image_160.jpg Concern with level of CEO target and maximum bonus opportunity
Image_161.jpg We moved towards a more typical compensation mix beginning in 2018, increasing the CEO’s base salary, but maintaining a below market median salary and reducing his target annual incentive to 200% of salary and maximum annual incentive to 1.5x the target bonus.
FY 2018


50
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Proxy Design
Image_162.jpg Provide an executive summary in the Proxy Statement and discuss responsiveness to shareholder feedback
Image_163.jpg We have improved our proxy disclosures by including a proxy summary and an executive summary at the beginning of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy Statement.
Image_164.jpg We have expanded disclosures on our shareholder input, practices, governance and ESG matters.
Image_165.jpg Re-designed the proxy layout to be more consistent with best practices and more user friendly.
FY 2017
and
FY 2022
Use of Peer Companies in Setting Executive Compensation and Measuring Performance

Purpose

The committee uses peer groups for the following purposes:

To
The committee uses peer group to assess executive compensation opportunities and competitive compensation (the “Pay"Pay Levels Peer Group”); and

Beginning with the 2018 LTI awards, to assess the company’s long-term performance, and in particular, to assess relative total shareholder return for purposes of determining payouts for a portion of the PSU awards (the “Performance Peer Group”Group").

As discussed in more detail below, our companyCompany has a unique product offering that makes it difficult to establish a group of pay-level peer companies for evaluating the competitiveness of our NEOs’ compensation opportunities and for measuring our relative business performance. In particular with the Company’s transformation, it iscontinues to be challenging to identify appropriate peers for our business performance among companies in our S&P8-digit and6-digit Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) codes, as many of the companies in those GICS codes that are of roughly similar size are exclusively energy focused, or manufacture, market, and distribute food for human consumption. These latter companies typically use agricultural commodities as ingredients in their products, and as a result these companies would typically experience reduced performance when these commodity prices rise. In contrast, our products are not generally for human consumption and our product prices generally track the performance of an identified group of agricultural commodities. As those agricultural commodities prices rise, our financial performance will generally improve, and conversely, as those commodities prices fall, our financial performance will generally be negatively impacted. As a result, our companyCompany tends to operate in opposite economic cycles from many of the other food or agricultural-related companies in our general GICS codes.

The Compensation Committee, in consultation with its former consultant Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer),Pay Governance, updated the selected companies for the Pay Levels Peer Group. The Pay Levels Peer Group that havehas one or more of the following characteristics: (i) similar in size and financial performance

to us, in particular market capitalization (ii) within a relevant industry group (including companies engaged in the production of ethanol, alternative fuels or gasoline oxygenates as well as the marketing and distribution of such fuels and increasingly so, companies engaged in the productionprocessing of agriculture products)products and or in specialty chemicals), (iii) considered competitors to us according to analysts and advisory firms and other selection criteria. The composition of the peer group is periodically reviewed and, if appropriate, updated to ensure continued relevancy and to account for mergers, acquisitions, divesturesdivestitures or other business-related changes that may occur. The following companies comprised the peer group for 2017:

Alon USA Energy, Inc. / The Andersons, Inc. / Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. / CVR Energy, Inc. / Darling Ingredients Inc. / Delek US Holdings, Inc. / Denbury Resources Inc. / H.B. Fuller Company / Koppers Holdings Inc. / Methanex Corporation / Renewable Energy Group, Inc. / SM Energy Company/ Whiting Petroleum Corporation

The committee believes that it is appropriate to use companies that are generally similar in size to our companyCompany for pay comparisons. For performance comparisons, however, the committee believes it is appropriate to use a broader peer group that is not limited by size or location to set the standards for long-term incentive plan performance, as company size and location do not materially influence performance comparisons. Although the committee is referencing two different peer groups, there is a substantial overlap of companies in the two peer groups.

The committee uses competitive pay information derived from the Pay Levels Peer Group to generally inform its compensation decisions but does not formulaically benchmark based on this data. The committee generally sets target levels of annual total direct compensation for the NEOs within a competitive range of the market median at the Pay Levels Peer Group. The committee considers each executive’s experience, responsibilities, performance and internal equity when setting compensation opportunities. Where company performance is strong, executives have the opportunity tocan earn above median compensation. Where company performance is weaker, compensation will be below the market median.

Performance



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION51
Pay Levels Peer Group

To better reflect

The following companies comprised the company’s operating segments of Feed, Food, and Fuel and the companies we compete with for employee talent and capital, the PerformancePay Levels Peer Group was established for purposes of evaluating our performance under the company’s incentive programs. In selecting the Performance Peer Group constituents, which are summarized in the table below, the Committee considered the following criteria: (i) industry, (ii) business operations similarused to those of the company, focused on Feed, Food, and/or Fuel, (iii) the extent to which operations were global, (iv) company size, as measured by revenues and market capitalization, and (v) availability of publicly-disclosed financial information.

inform 2023 pay decisions.

Anadarko Petroleum

The Andersons

Apache Corporation

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

Bunge Limited

Carrizo Oil & Gas

Concho Resources

ConocoPhillips

Pay Levels Peer Group
Amyris, Inc.
Clean Energy Fuels Corporation
CVR Energy, Inc.
Darling Ingredients

Inc.
Delek US Holdings,

Inc.
Denbury Resources Inc.
H.B. Fuller Company
Ingredion Incorporated
Koppers Holdings Inc.
New Market Corporation
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Talos Energy Inc.
The Andersons, Inc.
Devon Energy

Energen Corporation

EOG Resources Inc.

Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.

Halliburton Company

Helmerich & Payne

Hess Corporation

Marathon Oil

Matador Resources

Methanex Corp.

MGP Ingredients

Murphy Oil



Nabors Industries

Noble Energy, Inc.

Oasis Petroleum Inc.

52
Pacific Ethanol, Inc.

Patterson-UTI Energy

Renewable Energy Group

REX American Resources

SM Energy

SunOpta Inc.

Superior Energy Services

Valero Energy

Westlake Chemical

Whiting Petroleum

WPX Energy, Inc.

GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Mix

Components of Salary and Incentive Awards (at Target)

Our Compensation Programs

The following charts illustrate the mix of total direct compensation elements for our NEOs at target performance, excluding our former Chief Financial Officer who retired during fiscal 2017.performance. These charts demonstrate our executive compensation program’s focus on variable, performance drivenperformance-based cash and equity-based compensation a large portion of which is“at-risk” through long-term equity awards and annual cash incentive awards.

LOGO

Components of Fiscal 2017 Executive Compensation Program

BASE SALARY

Snapshot

The following chart illustrates the mix of total direct compensation elements for our CEO at target performance.
gfx_Executive Compensation.jpg
CEOAVG. OTHER NEOs
pie_componentsOfComp_CEO.jpg
03_429139-1_Components-of-Comp_NEO.jpg


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION53
FIXEDVARIABLE
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
BASE SALARYANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATIONRSAsPSUs
CEO TARGET PAY MIX
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-01.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-02.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-03.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-04.jpg
NEO TARGET PAY MIX
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-05.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-06.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-07.jpg
03_429139-1_pie_paymix-08.jpg
Base Salary
Our companyCompany provides NEOs with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered during each fiscal year. Base salary ranges for NEOs are determined for each executive based on histhe executive’s position and responsibility by using market data supplied by the committee’s independent compensation consultant. Base salary is designed to be competitive when compared with similar positions within the Pay Levels Peer Group. The committee periodically reviews base salaries of senior executives, including the NEOs, to determine if adjustment is necessary based on competitive practices and economic conditions. Base salary for senior executives will also be reviewed and adjustmentadjustments may be made based on individual performance and the individual’s skills, experience and background.

The chart below summarizes the annual base salary of our NEOs for fiscal 20172023 and 2016.

EXECUTIVE

 

  

        FISCAL 2016         

        ANNUAL        

        SALARY        

 

   

            FISCAL 2017             

            ANNUAL             

            SALARY             

 

   

            PERCENTAGE             

            INCREASE             

 

 

Mr. Becker

   $      525,000            $          525,000                0%         

Mr. Neppl (1)

   -            $          400,000                NA            

Mr. Peters (2)

   $      343,750            $          350,000                2%         

Mr. Simril (3)

   -            $          350,000                NA            

Mr. Briggs

   $      343,750            $          350,000                2%         

Mr. Bleyl (4)

   $      293,750            $          300,000                2%         

2022:
Name
Fiscal 2022
Annual
Salary
Fiscal 2023
Annual
Salary
Percentage
Increase
Mr. Becker

$800,000 

$800,000 0%
Mr. Stark (1)$350,000 $400,000 14.3%
Mr. Kadavy (1)

$380,000 

$380,000 0%
Ms. Mapes

$420,000 

$420,000 0%
Mr. Simpkins$450,000 

$450,000 0%
(1)Effective March 1, 2023, Messr. Stark's annual base salary was increased to $400,000, and effective March 1, 2024, Messr. Stark's and Kadavy's annual base salary was increased to $500,000 and $425,000, respectively.


54(1)Mr. Neppl’s employment began on September 11, 2017.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
(2)Mr. Peters retired as Chief Financial Officer on September 11, 2017, however is included as a NEO given his role.
(3)Mr. Simril is the President of Fleischmann’s Vinegar, which was acquired on October 3, 2016.
(4)Mr. Bleyl retired as Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing on December 31, 2017.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

Annual Incentive Compensation
Overview

To motivate performance and reward the achievement of critical objectives, each of our NEOs was provided with an annual incentive award opportunity for fiscal 2017. 2023.
The rangeannual incentive program advances our pay-for-performance philosophy by providing participants with annual bonus opportunities linked to the achievement of award payouts thatspecific performance goals. The annual incentive program is designed to:
Reinforce the Company’s goal-setting and strategic planning process;
Recognize the efforts of management in the achievement of key financial, operational and strategic objectives; and
Aid in attracting and retaining executive management, thus ensuring the long-range success of the Company.
The Compensation Committee sets objective performance measures for the Company as a whole and establishes corresponding performance goals for each participant under the annual incentive program, including our NEOs. In structuring the performance measures and goals, the Compensation Committee sets targets for achieving those goals:
Minimum threshold before any annual performance bonus can be earned;
Target goal to incentivize a specific desired performance level; and
Maximum goal, which requires an executive could earn, as well asappropriate level of stretch for a maximum bonus to be earned.
After the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines whether the performance goals were established in early 2017.

We use incentive compensation inhave been attained and approves any cash payment amount based upon the formlevel of achievement of the annual bonuses to reinforce performance-based objectives and retain key personnel.performance goals. The Compensation Committee established the Umbrella STIP, which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 annual meeting. As required by and working within the parameters of the Umbrella STIP, the Compensation Committee set specific 2017 operationalalso evaluates each executive’s performance goals. The Umbrella STIP, effective January 1, 2014, limits individual annual incentive bonuses to no more than $10 million and eligible executives’ incentive bonuses, as a pool, to no more than 6% of EBITDA, with each participating executive’s share of the pool defined by the Umbrella STIP, 60% for the Chief Executive Officeryear and 10% for eachdetermines their overall cash performance bonus based on an assessment of their performance, among other eligible executive, subjectthings, against the following objectives:

Leadership and company strategy;
Business performance and development;
Accomplishment of strategic objectives;
Commitment to reduction by the Compensation Committee. With 2017 EBITDAdevelopment of $154,370,000, the maximum amount of the eligible pool was $15,437,000, of which the Chief Executive Officer would be eligible for a maximum of $9,262,200management;
Growth initiatives; and each other named executive officer would be eligible for a maximum of $1,543,700. The Umbrella STIP provides that certain specified employees may be awarded cash bonuses by the Compensation Committee upon meeting certain additional specified performance goals or other performance criteria as determined by the Compensation Committee. The performance goals under the Umbrella STIP were established by the Compensation Committee within the first 90 days of 2017. Each current employee who is also an executive officer participates in the Umbrella STIP.

Financial and operational objectives.
Annual Incentive Award Opportunities

In early 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee established target annual incentive award opportunities for the NEOs for 2017,2023, as summarized in the table below:

Fiscal 2017 Target Bonus Opportunities

Executive

Target Cash Bonus

as a

Percent of Base

Salary

Potential Award Range

as a

Percent of Base

Salary

Mr. Becker

200%300%0 - 600%– 300%

Mr. Neppl(1)

Stark
80%  80%0 - 200%

Mr. Peters(2)

Kadavy
80%  80%0 - 200%

Mr. Simril

Ms. Mapes
80%  80%0 - 200%

Mr. Briggs

Simpkins
80%  80%0 - 200%

Mr. Bleyl(3)

  80%0 - 200%

(1)Mr. Neppl’s employment began on September 11, 2017.
(2)Mr. Peters retired as Chief Financial Officer on September 11, 2017.
(3)Mr. Bleyl retired as Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing on December 31, 2017.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION55
Annual Incentive Award Formula

In early 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee approved the following performance measures, weighting and goals, and corresponding payouts, for use in determining payouts under the 20172023 annual incentive program. Points are awardedprogram:
ObjectiveWeighting
Threshold
Performance /
50% Payout
Target
Performance /
100% Payout
Maximum
Performance /
200% Payout (1)
Transformational EBITDA37.5%$160 million $210 million$260 million
Safety (2)2.5%576063
Environmental2.5%293031
Run Rate (mm gal/year)5%800877893
ESG - ISS Scoring2.5%3.002.672.33
Renewable Corn Oil, Protein and Ethanol Yields5%Earned based on various performance targets for each product
Other Operating Initiatives25%Earned based on various quantitative metrics for each operating initiative (3)
MBOs / Individual Performance20%Earned through MBO attainment
(1)The maximum potential payout for each measure (as a % of the weighting at target) is 200% of target.
(2)The plant safety goal is comprised of 11 different safety metrics inclusive of lost time, timeliness of incident reporting, safety training, completion of safety drills, environmental plan review and training, environmental incident, third party audit close outs, process safety management compliance, development of standard operating procedures (SOPs), for maintenance, and for rail, SOP training, other on the job training requirements and compliance with the Food Safety Modernization Act. Safety is measured on a minimum levelpoint basis with a base line score of aggregate performance (40 points)100 with deductions for not meeting safety objectives.
(3)Other operating initiatives include multiple initiatives including but not limited to new protein or strategic partnerships, Clean Sugar build progress, operating expense per gallon, FQT's third party sales, and SG&A expenditures. Each operating initiative has quantitative metrics.
Each measure is required in order for executive officers to be eligible for a bonus payout under the annual incentive program:

 

Objective (1)

 

Weighting (i.e.,
Potential Points)

 

 

Threshold (20%
of Points)

 

 

Target (100%
of Points)

 

 

Maximum (150% to
250% of Points) (2)

 

 

   Ethanol EBITDA

 

 

45%

 

 

$59 million

 

 

$82 million

 

 

$118 million

 

 

   Non- Ethanol EBITDA

 

 

20%

 

 

$30 million

 

 

$85 million

 

 

$154 million

 

 

   RONA

 

 

10%

 

 

1%

 

 

5%

 

 

9%

 

 

   Plant Safety

 

 

5%

 

 

66-72 points

 

 

80-86 points

 

 

94-100 Points

 

 

   Individual Performance and

   Committee Discretion

 

 

20%

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

(1)The plant safety goal is comprised of 11 different safety metrics inclusive of lost time, timeliness of incident reporting, safety training, completion of safety drills, environmental plan review and training, environmental incident, third party audit close outs, process safety management (PSM) compliance, development of standard operating procedures (SOPs), for maintenance, and for rail, SOP training, other on the job training requirements and compliance with the Food Safety modernization Act.
(2)Maximum potential points awarded for each measure (as a % of the weighting at target) is 150% for safety, 200% for RONA and Individual Performance/Committee Discretion and 250% for Ethanol andNon-Ethanol EBITDA.

Ifseparately weighted and if performance falls between the specified performance levels, the number of pointspayout earned will be determined using astraight-line interpolation.

interpolation (for those measures with threshold, target and maximum performance goals).

The performance levels, aggregate performance required to earn a payout at each level and corresponding payouts for the NEOs are summarized in the table below:

   

 

Payout as a % of the Target
Bonus

 

 

   Level of Attainment

 

 

 

    CEO    

 

 

 

    Other NEOs    

 

 

   Threshold (at or above 40 points)

 

 

 

66.7%

 

 

 

62.5%

 

 

   Target (at or above 80 points)

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

100%

 

 

   Maximum (at or above 120 points)

 

 

 

200%

 

 

 

250%

 

to the right:



Level of Attainment Payout as a % of the
Target Bonus
(All NEOs except CEO)
Payout as a %
of the Target
Bonus (CEO)
Threshold50%50%
Target80%200%
Maximum200%300%


56
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Determination of Payouts

Following the end of 2017,2023, the Compensation Committee assessed the company’sCompany’s performance on the three financial measures above and plant safety,each of the NEOs individual performance, and determined that the minimum levelpayout earned.
Company ObjectiveWeightingThreshold PerformanceTarget PerformanceMaximum Performance (1)
Transformational EBITDA
03_429139-3_chart_ebitda37.5%-01.jpg
03_429139-3_charts_TransformationalEBITDA_1.jpg
Safety
03_429139-3_chart_ISS_Scoring-2.5%-01.jpg
03_429139-3_charts_safety.jpg
Environmental
03_429139-3_chart_ISS_Scoring-2.5%-01.jpg
03_429139-3_charts_environmental.jpg
Run Rate (mm gal/year)
Piechart_Ethanol EBITDA -12.jpg
03_429139-3_charts_status.jpg
ESG - ISS Scoring
03_429139-3_chart_ISS_Scoring-2.5%-01.jpg
03_429139-3_chart_ISS_Scoring-01-05.jpg
Renewable Corn Oil, Protein and Ethanol Yields
03_429139-3_pie_5.jpg
Earned based on various performance targets for each product (2)
Other Operating Initiatives
03_429139-3_chart_operating_initiatives-01.jpg
Earned based on various quantitative metrics for each operating initiative (3)
Individual Performance
MBOs
MBOs_20%.jpg
Earned on an individual basis
(1)The maximum potential payout for each measure (as a % of the weighting at target) is 200% of target.
(2)The Company achieved these performance required to earnmeasures at an average of 90% of target.
(3)The Company did not achieve these metrics for three of the five initiatives and no payout resulted from these categories. The Company achieved a payout forof 6.5 out of 10 target points on the year would not be attained without awarding a payout for individual performance. In lightother two initiatives.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION57
The Board and Compensation Committee determined the following executive officers met the aforementioned objectives with the following accomplishments:
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Continues to lead all aspects of the company’s transformation, repositioning the Company’s biorefineries to include four pillars-protein, oil, sugar, and carbon;
Guided the expansion of protein sales to customers in North America, South America, and Asia Pacific across multiple species;
Accelerated the deployment of Clean Sugar Technology™ Infrastructure-inclusive of technology and the commercialization plan;
Led company to continued overall improvement in safety performance, including an improved OSHA Incident Rate;
Provided effective leadership to guide multiple joint venture and partnership opportunities, including the building of the MSC™ High-Protein facility with Tharaldson Ethanol and disruptive technology solutions with Shell, United Airlines, and Tallgrass; and
Proactively led ongoing stakeholder engagement efforts, including events for customers, investors, employees, media, and prospective employees.
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Evolved our financial results,planning and analysis capabilities to support all aspects of the Committee electedtransformation of our business;
Led the implementation of the initial stages of our new accounting system;
Ensured a proactive engagement strategy with our investors, inclusive of guiding our Inflation Reduction Act Teach-In;
Drove the development of a strategic financing plan to award no pointsguide the company through its next five years of growth; and
Provided leadership to the team through the merger agreement with Green Plains Partners LP.
Executive Vice President - Commercial Operations
Provided leadership for individual performance, resultingour commercial team, driving change and talent enhancement consistent with the needs of our evolving business;
Led the engagement of prospective customers in no payout underour key strategic growth areas;
Actively engaged cross functionally in multiple efforts to ensure quality product and service delivery for our customers across all aspects of our product portfolio;
Developed and deployed an integrated business planning process across the Annual Incentive Programcommercial organization, aligning short-term objectives with long-term strategic priorities; and
Guided and oversaw the high-protein commercialization plan execution, enabling record production volumes.
Chief Legal and Administration Officer
Leading a company-wide cross-functional team to progress our ESG and renewable fuel initiatives;
Successfully led a number of litigation matters for 2017.

 

Objective

 

 

Weighting
(i.e., Potential
Points)

 

 

 

Threshold
(20% of
Points)

 

 

 

Target (100%
of Points)

 

 

Maximum (150%
to 250% of
Points)
1

 

 

 

Actual
Performance
2

 

 

Points
Earned

 

   Ethanol EBITDA

 

 

 

45%

 

 

 

$59 million

 

 

 

$82 million

 

 

 

$118 million

 

 

 

$49.9 million

 

 

 

0

 

 

   Non- Ethanol EBITDA

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

$30 million

 

 

 

$85 million

 

 

 

$154 million

 

 

 

$147.1 million

 

 

 

19

 

 

   RONA

 

 

 

10%

 

 

 

1%

 

 

 

5%

 

 

 

9%

 

 

 

2.26%

 

 

 

3.5

 

 

   Plant Safety

 

 

 

5%

 

 

 

66-72 points

 

 

 

80-86 points

 

 

 

94-100 Points

 

 

 

95 points

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

   Individual Performance

   and Committee

   Discretion

 

 

 

20%

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

0

 

 

   Total

 

           

 

30.0

 

the company;
Provided proactive guidance to multiple stakeholder relations matters, including our government relations efforts;
Continued to lead the resolution of insurance matters;
Delivered leadership of the Green Plains Partners LP merger; and
As Corporate Secretary, led activities to continue fostering adherence to the highest standards of corporate governance.
Chief Transformation Officer (CTO)
Provided leadership to a portfolio optimization review, inclusive of the divestiture of Atkinson;
Provided cross-company support to commercial, operational, and financial company transformation initiatives; and
Led development and operations of the company’s public terminal operations business Green Plains Partners LP.


58(1)Maximum potential points awarded for each measure (as a % of the weighting at target) is 150% for safety, 200% for RONA and Individual Performance/Committee Discretion and 250% for Ethanol andNon-Ethanol EBITDA.
(2)EBITDA calculation for payout determination excludes certain corporate selling, general and administrative costs.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Instead, theThe Compensation Committee determined, after consultation with its independent compensation consultant, that based on the achievement of 30 points with respect to the three financial measures and plant safety,Company performance as described above, as well as strong performance on Operating Initiatives, and the NEOs’ contributions and achievement of their individual objectives as described on pages 22 and 23 above, to award a discretionary bonus,the following bonuses for 2023, which for the NEOs that were employed for the entire year, ranged from 43%45% to 57%81% of each NEO’s 20172023 target bonus, as illustrated in the table below:

EXECUTIVE

 

 

 

FISCAL 2017
TARGET BONUS
OPPORTUNITY

 

 

2017 BONUS

 

 

 

PAYOUT
AS A PERCENT
OF TARGET

 

 

Mr. Becker

 

 

 

$1,575,000

 

 

 

$670,000

 

 

 

42.5%

 

 

Mr. Neppl(1)

 

 

 

$106,667

 

 

 

$85,000

 

 

 

79.7%

 

 

Mr. Peters(2)

 

 

 

$210,000

 

 

 

$78,750

 

 

 

37.5%

 

 

Mr. Simril

 

 

 

$280,000

 

 

 

$132,500

 

 

 

47.3%

 

 

Mr. Briggs

 

 

 

$280,000

 

 

 

$160,000

 

 

 

57.1%

 

 

Mr. Bleyl(3)

 

 

 

$240,000

 

 

 

$0

 

 

 

0%

 

(1)Mr. Neppl’s employment began on September 11, 2017. Amount above reflects hispro-rated target bonus for the year.
(2)Mr. Peters retired as Chief Financial Officer on September 11, 2017. Amount above reflects hispro-rated target bonus for the year.
(3)Mr. Bleyl retired as Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing on December 31, 2017.

With respect to the NEOs that were employed for all of 2017, the bonuses awarded were less than their threshold payout under the annual incentive program.

ExecutiveFiscal 2023
Target Bonus
Opportunity
2023 BonusPayout as
a Percent
of Target
Mr. Becker$1,600,000 $725,000 45%
Mr. Stark$320,000 $260,000 81%
Mr. Kadavy$304,000 $201,000 66%
Ms. Mapes$336,000 $273,000 81%
Mr. Simpkins$360,000 $211,000 59%
Notably, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, the annual bonus awarded (42.5%(45% of his target bonus) is significantly below the payout that would have been earned for threshold performance under the annual incentive program for 2017 (i.e., 66.7% of his target bonus) and significantly below his 2016 annual bonus.payout. The Compensation Committee also believes that the 20172023 bonuses properly reflect the company’sCompany’s performance and each executive’s contributions during the year and are consistent with our compensation philosophy and objectives.

Other Bonus Plans

During 2017, in connection with the acquisition of Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company on October 3, 2016 and pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Simril continued to participate in the Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company’s annual bonus plan for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. Mr. Simril’s payout under this predecessor plan, as negotiated at the time of purchase, was based 60% on the achievement of Fleischmann’s EBITDA goals for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 and 40% on individual performance objectives.

Following the end of Fleischmann’s fiscal year, the

Long-Term Incentive Compensation Committee evaluated EBITDA relative to thepre-established goals. It was determined that Fleischmann’s EBITDA as well as Mr. Simril’s individual performance objectives exceeded the target performance goal for fiscal 2017. Accordingly, Mr. Simril was paid a bonus in October 2017 under the Fleischmann annual bonus plan in the amount of $990,000.

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

Each of our NEOs was provided with long-term incentive award opportunities for fiscal 20172023 that were tied to our performance. The principal objectives of the LTIPLTI awards are to (i) motivate our NEOs to drive sustained long-term shareholder value creation, (ii) grant award opportunities that are based on the competitive market, but then adjusted for our performance, and (iii) provide the NEOs with equity ownership opportunities that will further enhance their alignment with our shareholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee believes that providing long-term equity-based awards incentivizes executives to balance short- and long-term decisions, which helps to mitigate excessive risk-taking by our executives.

Grants are generally made in the first quarter of each year; however, in limited, special situations, equitylong-term incentive awards may be granted at other times to attract new executives and to retain existing executives. One such special award was granted to Mr. Neppl during 2017, when he joined
Type and Incentive Mix
For 2023, the company.

Fiscal 2017 Long-Term Incentive Awards

Long-term incentiveNEOs’ awards were granted by50% in PSUs, which vest on the Compensation Committeethird anniversary of the grant date, with the balance in service based RSAs, which vest ratably over the three-year period following the date of grant.

LTI Incentive MixYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4
Image_187.jpg
RSAsGrantOne Third VestsOne Third VestsOne Third Vests
Image_188.jpg
PSUs
Image_189.jpg
Earned
Performance Share Unit Awards. PSUs are tied to the NEOs in early 2017. In determining these awards, the Committee considered the company’s performance in 2016, focusing primarily onour Company’s long-term strategic objectives to ensure that our NEOs’ compensation is directly linked to the achievement of annual EBITDA targets,sustained long-term operating performance and expected, resulting stock price performance. Reflective of the desire to align the NEOs with achievement of our business strategy and Green Plains 2.0, the Committee determined that 2023 PSU awards would be earned based on achievement of key initiatives (as described on page 57 of the proxy) for a three-year performance period. Shares not earned in each NEO’s accomplishments compared withperformance period expire and are forfeited. PSUs are also subject to potential forfeiture if an executive terminates their goals for the year, competitive market data for each executiveemployment prior to vesting.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION59
Grants
The 2023 RSA awards and an evaluation of each executive’s total compensation for 2016. Based on our 2016 financial performance, individual performance evaluations and competitive pay data, RSUPSU awards were granted to the NEOs in March 2017 for 2016 performance, which are summarized in the chart below.

EXECUTIVE

 

  

NUMBER

OF RSUs

 

   

GRANT DATE
VALUE

 

  

AWARD AS A % OF
BASE SALARY

 

 

Mr. Becker

 

   

 

132,610

 

 

 

  $

 

3,222,400

 

 

 

  

 

614%

 

 

 

Mr. Neppl(1)

 

   

 

32,172

 

 

 

  $

 

600,000

 

 

 

  

 

150%

 

 

 

Mr. Peters(2)

 

   

 

-

 

 

 

   

 

-

 

 

 

  

 

NA

 

 

 

Mr. Simril

 

   

 

-

 

 

 

   

 

-

 

 

 

  

 

NA

 

 

 

Mr. Briggs

 

   

 

23,797

 

 

 

  $

 

578,261

 

 

 

  

 

165%

 

 

 

Mr. Bleyl(3)

 

   

 

17,778

 

 

 

  $

 

432,000

 

 

 

  

 

144%

 

 

 

(1)Mr. Neppl’s employment began on September 11, 2017. Represents the RSU award granted in connection with his offer of employment.
(2)Mr. Peters retired as Chief Financial Officer on September 11, 2017.
(3)Mr. Bleyl retired as Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing on December 31, 2017.

Changestables below:

ExecutiveNumber of
Shares
Award Value (1)Award as a % of
Annual Base
Salary
RSAsPSUsRSAsPSUsRSAsPSUs
Mr. Becker60,58960,589$2,100,000$2,100,000263%263%
Mr. Stark10,09910,099$350,000$350,00089%89%
Mr. Kadavy10,09910,099$350,000$350,00092%92%
Ms. Mapes8,6568,656$300,000$300,00071%71%
Mr. Simpkins10,09910,099$350,000$350,00078%78%
(1)Based on the closing price of our stock on March 9, 2023 of $34.66/share.
Metrics
The performance levels and corresponding payouts established for the Company’s Performance Goals described below with respect to the LTI Program

After reviewing trends2023 PSU awards are summarized in executive compensation andpay-related governance policies and in response to the results of our 2017 say on pay vote, the Committee made the following changes to the company’s LTIP, beginning with the 2018 annual awards:

table below:
As illustrated in the chart below, a shift was made from granting solely service-based RSUs based on an assessment of the prior-year’s results to annual grants of (i) PSUs tied to three-year, forward-looking performance (based 50% on average annual RONA and 50% on total shareholder return relative to our Performance Peer Group) and (ii) service-based RSUs that vest33-1/3% on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversaries of grant withone-half of opportunity granted in PSUs and RSUs, respectively.

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

RSUs

Grant

1/3 Vests

1/3 Vests

1/3 Vests

PSUs

Performance Period

Earned

The performance levels and corresponding payouts established for RONA and TSR with respect to the 2018 PSU awards are summarized in the table below.

Performance Level

Payout % of Target
Number of
PSUs Earned

Maximum

150%200%*

Target

100 100%%

Threshold

50 50%

Below Threshold

0%

%

*    In 2023 and 2022, the Company's CEO has a maximum opportunity of 200% of the target number of PSUs with further stretch Performance Goals necessary for achievement of such levels, as described below. In 2020 and 2021, the Company’s CEO and former CFO had a maximum opportunity of 300% of the target number of PSUs with further stretch Performance Goals necessary for achievement of such levels, as described below. If performance falls between the threshold and the specified performance levels, payouts will be interpolated as determined using straight-line interpolation.

RONA was selectedby the Compensation Committee at its discretion.



60
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
The Performance Goals for the 2023 LTI awards granted in March 2023 set by the Compensation Committee are as a performance measure for PSU awards as strong RONA is very important to our sustained financial success and TSR was selected to further link executive officers’ compensation to shareholder returns and drive shareholder value creation.

follows:

Threshold - 50% vestingTarget - 100% vestingMax - 200% vesting
EBITDA of a specified amountEBITDA of an amount that is 35% greater than the thresholdEBITDA of an amount that is 80% greater than the threshold
MSC ROI of a specified amountMSC ROI that is 25% greater than the thresholdMSC ROI that is 50% greater than the threshold
Sugar ROI of a specified amountSugar ROI that is 19% greater than the thresholdSugar ROI that is 37% greater than the threshold
The Compensation Committee views these modificationsperformance goals to be aligned with the objectives of motivating and rewarding executives for performance on key long-term measures, while also promoting retention of executive talent.

Additional detail with respect to The PSUs that vested during the designyear-ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, achieved a final payout of PSUs is provided below. Information regarding the value123%, 150% and number75% of PSUstheir performance target.

Retirement Benefits and RSUs granted to the NEOs that were employed on March 15, 2018 will be disclosed in the 2019 Proxy Statement in accordance with SEC disclosure rules.

Performance Share Unit Awards.PSUs are tied to our company’s long-term performance to ensure that our NEOs’ compensation is directly linked to the achievement of sustained long-term operating performance and stock price performance. Reflective of the desire to balance prudent use of capital and returns to our shareholders, the committee has determined that

Perquisites

awards will be earned based on a combination of our average annual RONA for a three-year, performance period and our TSR relative to the Performance Peer Group (described on page 25 of the proxy) over the same period. The performance goals for the portion of the award tied to relative TSR is as follows:

Performance Level

Performance Goals

Payout % of Target Number of
PSUs Earned

Maximum

80th Percentile or Higher150%

Target

55th Percentile100%

Threshold

25th Percentile50%

Below Threshold

Below 25th Percentile

0%

Dividend equivalents on PSUs will be accrued and paid in company stock at the same time as PSUs are settled, but only if and to the extent PSUs are earned.

RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES

Retirement Benefits

Our companyCompany offers a 401(k) plan to all of its eligible U.S.-based salaried employees. TheDuring 2021, the 401(k) plan includesincluded an employer contribution ranging from 1% of a participant’s base salary, and a matching contribution of 100% of a participant’s contributions, up to 4% of a participant’s base salary.

During 2022, the company increased the employer match from 4% to 6% of eligible employee contributions for employees with less than 5 years of service, and up to 8% of eligible employee contributions after 5 years of service. Employee and employer contributions are 100% vested immediately.

We do not provide special or supplemental retirement benefits to our NEOs.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The companyCompany provides limited perquisites to the NEOs. Consistent with the benefitbenefits offered to all other eligible employees, the companyCompany provides our NEOs with (i) choice of various health care plans (ii) a matching contribution to the company’sCompany’s 401(k) Plan, up to a maximum of $10,800$26,400 in 2017,2023 for employees with greater than five years of service and up to a maximum of $19,800 in 2023 for employees with less than five years of service, as well as (ii) Company(iii) company paid life insurance. In addition, in accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Becker also receives additional insurance and disability benefits as well as a taxgross-up payment to cover the taxes associated with these benefits.

EMPLOYMENT AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS

Our companybenefits, the details of which are set forth below.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION61
Compensation Policies and Procedures
Employment and Severance Agreements
The Company has entered into Employment Agreements with Messrs. Becker, Neppl, Briggs, Simril, BleylStark, Kadavy and PetersSimpkins and Ms. Mapes that provide for, among other things, potential payments and other benefits upon termination of employment for a variety of reasons.

Additionally, the Company has entered into Change in Control Severance Plans with Messrs. Becker, Stark, Kadavy, Simpkins and Ms. Mapes that provide for, among other things, potential payments and other benefits upon termination of employment due to a change in control.

See “Employment Agreements” and “Potential Payments upon Termination orChange-in-Control” Change in Control” included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement for a description of these agreements, including the severance benefits thereunder.

The Committee believes that these severance arrangements are an important part of overall compensation for our NEOs and an important recruitment and retention tool as most of our competitors have implemented similar arrangements for their senior employees. Certain of these agreements include the Compensation Committee approved change of control provisions to provide reasonable personal protection to our senior executives in the context of an actual or potential change of control of our company.Company. The committee views these arrangements as preventing management distraction during the critical periods prior to and immediately following a change of control. The Compensation Committee may adjust base salary, bonus percentage or long-term incentives to levels that exceed the initial terms of the executive officers’ employment agreements based on its periodic review of compensation data.

STOCK OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION POLICY

Our company

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy
The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of ournon-employee directors and NEOs with those of our shareholders. The guidelines require our non-employee directors and NEOs andnon-employee directors to maintain an investment in our Common Stock at the following levels:

Chief Executive Officer, six times his annual base salary;
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, four times their annual base salary;
All other NEO’s, three times their base salary; and
Non-Employee Directors, five times their annual cash retainer.

POLICY AGAINST HEDGING AND PLEDGING COMPANY STOCK

Chief Executive Officer, six times his annual base salary;
Chief Financial Officer, four times his annual base salary;
All other NEOs, three times their base salary; and
Non-Employee Directors, five times their annual cash retainer.
Non-employee directors and NEOs have three years from the time of engagement to come into compliance with these guidelines.
Policy Against Hedging and Pledging Company Stock
In addition, the companyCompany has a policy that prohibits each NEOany director or officer, at all times, or employee of the Company who is aware of material nonpublic information relating to the company from (A) engaging in (i) short-term trading (generally defined as selling companyCompany securities within six months following the purchase), (ii) short sales, (iii) transactions involving derivatives, (iv) hedging transactions or (v) any other contractual derivative transactions, such as total return swaps and (B) holding company securities in a margin account or pledging company securities as collateral for a loan, unless grantedloan. Two directors who previously had shares pledged under previously allowed exceptions no longer have shares pledged and no longer have the ability to pledge as the Company policy was amended so that no exceptions to pledging may be granted. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in 2024, the Company's Insider Policy was amended to clarify that pledging of Company common stock by a family member of an exception byinsider is not prohibited, if the Board. One directorapplicable insider has disclaimed beneficial ownership of such shares currently pledged.

COMPENSATION RECOVERY (CLAWBACKS)

and has not and does not share material, nonpublic information about the Company with such person.



62
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Recovery (Clawback)
In early 2018, we adopted the Green Plains Inc. Clawback Policy (the "Policy") a compensation recovery policy that goes beyondto allow the policies currently required by law. Specifically, the policy requires each executive officerBoard to reimburse the company for all or a portion of anyrecover annual or long-term incentive awards in connection with a material financial restatement. In November 2023, we updated the Policy, which is intended to comply with the Nasdaq listing standards adopted pursuant to Rule 10D-1 under the Exchange Act. Under this Policy, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to any material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under applicable securities laws, we will be required to recover from current and former executive officers any incentive-based compensation paidthat was erroneously awarded to the executive officers during the three years preceding the date that the Company is required to prepare such restatement, unless the Compensation Committee determines that recovery would be impracticable. Incentive-based compensation includes compensation that is granted, earned or vested based wholly or in part on a financial reporting measure.
If mandatory recovery is triggered under this Policy due to an accounting restatement, we are required to recover the excess of the amount of incentive-based compensation actually received by the executive officer over the amount of incentive-based compensation that he or she would have received had payment been determined based on achievement ofthe restated financial results that were subsequently the subject ofmeasure.
In fiscal year 2023, we had no financial statement corrections requiring a restatement, due to the executive’s misconduct, to the extent determined byand the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may

also determinehas not needed to require the forfeiture of unvested awards, reduce future compensation or take other disciplinary actions (including termination of employment). The Committee believes thatconsider taking any action under this compensation recovery policy enhances our governance practices by creating direct financial costs to NEOs whose misconduct leads to a material financial restatement.

Policy.

In addition, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, upon restatement of our company’sCompany’s financial statements, the Chief

Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer would be required to reimburse us for any (i) bonuses, (ii) other incentive orequity-based compensation, and/or (iii) profits from stock sales, received in the12-month period following the filing of financial statements that were later required to be restated due to their misconduct. Our companyCompany will also implement the incentive compensation “clawback” provisions mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 in accordance with the requirements of that Act as the method of their implementation becomes finalized by the stock exchanges.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Compensation Risk Assessment
With the help of its compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee reviewed our executive compensation policies and practices and determined that our executive compensation programs are not designed to encourage excessive risk-taking. Moreover, the Compensation Committee did not make any pandemic-related, discretionary adjustments to either its annual incentive program or its long-term incentive program.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit of $1 million on compensation the companyCompany may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any one year with respect to any of certain covered officers employed by the company. PriorCompany.
Although the Compensation Committee considers tax deductibility in making its compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee does not believe that compensation decisions should be determined solely by the amount of compensation that is deductible for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to the enactmentaward compensation that may not be deductible.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No Compensation Committee member (i) was an officer or employee of the Tax Cuts and Jobs ActCompany, (ii) was formerly an officer of 2017 (the “TCJA”) in December 2017, compensation that was “performance-based” was excluded from this $1 million limitation and was deductible by the company. UnderCompany or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure under the TCJA,SEC’s rules governing disclosure of related person transactions. During the performance-based exception has been repealed generally for tax years beginning afterfiscal year ended December 31, 2017. A limited exception applies to certain compensation that qualifies2023, we had no “interlocking” relationships in which (i) an executive officer of the Company served as performance-based compensation underpre-TCJA IRC Section 162(m), provided it is paid pursuant to a written binding contract in effectmember of the Compensation Committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on November 2, 2017 and which has not been modified in any material respectthe Compensation Committee of the Company, (ii) an executive officer of the Company served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of the Company, or after that date. Pursuant to this exception,(iii) an executive officer of the company should be entitled to deduct certain qualifying performance-based compensation suchCompany served as compensation attributable to stock options. Absent formal guidance froma member of the Treasury Department andCompensation Committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of the IRS, it is not possible for the company to determine at this time which, if any, other awards previously granted under the company’s compensatory plans may qualify for this exception.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Company.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION63
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with management and based on that review and those discussions, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated into the Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

2023.

Respectfully submitted,

Alain Treuer,

Brian Peterson, Chairman

Jim
James D.
Anderson

Gene Edwards

Thomas Manuel


Farha Aslam



64
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the total compensation paid or earned by each of our named executive officers for our fiscal years 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015.

NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION

 

 

YEAR  

 

 

SALARY

($)

 

  

BONUS

($)

 

  

STOCK

AWARDS

($) (1)

 

  

NON-

EQUITY
INCENTIVE

PLAN

COMP.

($) (2)

 

  

ALL
OTHER
COMP.

($) (3)

 

  

TOTAL

($)

 

 
        

Todd Becker(4)

 2017    525,000   670,000   3,222,400   -   87,607   4,505,007 

President and Chief
Executive Officer

 2016    525,000   -   3,000,000   1,812,600   86,952   5,424,552 
 2015    525,000   -   3,100,000   1,500,000   86,652   5,211,652 
  

John Neppl(4) (5)

 2017    124,359   85,000   600,000   -   4,223   813,582 

Chief Financial Officer

        
  

Jerry Peters(4) (6)

 2017    262,500   78,750   -   -   1,459,042   1,800,292 

Former Chief Financial Officer

 2016    343,750    500,000   325,000   11,507   1,180,257 
  2015    300,000    600,000   240,000   11,529   1,151,529 
  

Kenneth Simril(7)

 2017    350,000   132,500   -   990,000   12,088   1,484,588 

President – Fleischmann’s Vinegar

        
  

Jeff Briggs(4)

 2017    350,000   160,000   578,261   -   11,407   1,099,668 

Chief Operating Officer and President,
Green Plains Ethanol

 2016    343,750   -   500,000   371,739   11,067   1,226,556 
 2015    300,000   -   600,000   240,000   11,070   1,151,070 
  

Steve Bleyl(8)

 2017    300,000   -   432,000   -   292,991   1,024,991 

Former Executive Vice President -

Ethanol Marketing

 

 2016    293,750   -   350,000   288,000   11,374   943,124 
 2015  

 

  

 

250,000

 

 

 

  

 

-

 

 

 

  

 

575,000

 

 

 

  

 

200,000

 

 

 

  

 

11,374

 

 

 

  

 

1,036,374

 

 

 

2021:
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Bonus ($)Stock
Awards
($) (1)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Comp.
($) (2)
All Other
Comp.
($) (3)
Total
($)
Todd Becker
President and Chief Executive Officer
2023800,000 – 4,200,029 725,000 111,420 5,836,449 
2022800,000 – 4,052,302 900,000 108,734 5,861,036 
2021729,167 – 3,595,602 1,440,000 99,761 5,864,530 
James Stark (4)
Chief Financial Officer
2023391,667 – 700,063 260,000 21,943 1,373,673 
2022342,708 150,000 250,000 207,165 35,886 985,759 
Grant Kadavy (5)
Executive Vice President Commercial Operations
2023380,000 – 700,063 201,000 18,606 1,299,669 
Michelle Mapes
Chief Legal and Administration Officer and Corporate Secretary
2023420,000 – 600,034 273,000 31,105 1,324,139 
2022420,000 – 658,536 298,998 31,105 1,408,639 
2021370,417 – 691,474 336,000 17,325 1,415,216 
Patrich Simpkins (6)
Chief Transformation Officer
2023450,000 – 700,063 211,000 32,027 1,393,090 
2022450,000 – 911,802 266,355 32,226 1,660,383 
2021414,583 – 1,382,948 336,000 19,157 2,152,688 
(1)Amounts for “Stock Awards” reflect a grant date fair value of $34.66/share in 2023, $29.47/share in 2022 and $26.22/share in 2021 computed in accordance with ASC 718. Restricted stock awards granted in 2023 and 2022 vest ratably over the three-year period following the date of grant while 2021 cliff vests three years following the date of grant. Performance share unit awards were granted to all NEOs in March 2023, February 2022 and February 2021, which cliff-vest in March 2026, February 2025 and February 2024, respectively, based on achievement of a variety of key initiatives related to Green Plains 2.0. Performance share unit awards are included in the Stock Awards column above and presented as the fair value at the date of the grant based the Company’s closing stock price. The grant date fair value of the 2023 restricted stock awards, as well as the target and maximum potential fair value of the performance share unit awards, are also provided below. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information.
PSUs
NameRSAs ($)Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Mr. Becker2,100,015 2,100,015 4,200,029 
Mr. Stark350,031 350,031 700,063 
Mr. Kadavy350,031 350,031 700,063 
Ms. Mapes300,017 300,017 600,034 
Mr. Simpkins350,031 350,031 700,063 
(2)The column for “Option Awards” has been omitted from this table because no compensation is reportable thereunder. “Non-equity incentive plan compensation” amounts were paid pursuant to the Incentive Plan.
(3)“All Other Compensation” generally consists of our match to the executive officer’s 401(k) retirement plan, up to a maximum of $22,500 per employee for 2023 plus any catch-up payments for anyone age 50 or older during the calendar year, $20,500 per employee for 2022 and $11,600 per employee for 2021, and imputed income on company-paid life insurance. In addition:
(a)For Mr. Becker, the amounts also include insurance and disability premiums paid by us of $47,048 and a gross-up to cover the taxes on this benefit of $37,495. See Employment Agreements below for further information on our employment agreement with Mr. Becker.
(4)Mr. Stark became a NEO in 2022. As a result, only compensation paid or earned for 2023 and 2022 is reported above.
(5)Mr. Kadavy became a NEO in 2023. As a result, only compensation paid or earned for 2023 is reported above.
(6)Mr. Simpkins served as the Company's Chief Financial Officer through October 2022.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION1)Amounts for “Stock awards” reflect the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718. Amounts in the “Stock awards” column for 2017 includes awards made in 2017 for 2016 compensation, 2016 includes awards made in 2016 for 2015 compensation, and 2015 includes awards made in 2015 for 2014 compensation. Restricted stock unit awards granted in 2017, 2016 and 2015 vest ratably, annually over the three-year period following the date of grant. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information.
2)The column for “Option Awards” has been omitted from this table because no compensation is reportable thereunder.“Non-equity incentive plan compensation” amounts were paid pursuant to the Umbrella STIP.
3)“All other compensation” generally consists of our match to the executive officer’s 401(k) retirement plan, up to a maximum of $10,800 per employee for 2017 and $10,600 per employee for 2016 and 2015, and imputed income on Company-paid life insurance. In addition:
a.For Mr. Becker, the amounts also include insurance and disability premiums paid by us of $40,409 and agross-up to cover the taxes on this benefit of $35,763. See Employment Arrangements below for further information on our employment agreement with Mr. Becker.
b.For Mr. Peters, the amount also includes the value of accelerated vesting of outstanding restricted stock unit awards and other amounts earned upon retirement of $1,447,254. See Employment Arrangements below for further information on our employment agreement with Mr. Peters.
c.For Mr. Bleyl, the amount also includes the value of accelerated vesting upon retirement of outstanding restricted stock unit awards of $281,159 on December 31, 2017. See Employment Arrangements below for further information on our employment agreement with Mr. Bleyl.
4)Messrs. Becker, Briggs, Neppl and Peters were also named executive officers for GPP in 2017. Pursuant to the operational services and secondment agreement, Mr. Becker’s salary, bonus, stock awards,non-equity incentive plan compensation and all other compensation allocated to GPP for 2017 was $22,725, $29,002, $139,487, $0 and $3,792, and for 2016 was $22,916, $0, $130,947, $79,118 and $3,795 respectively, Mr. Neppl’s salary, bonus, stock awards,non-equity incentive plan compensation and all other compensation allocated to GPP for 2017 was $5,383, $3,679, $25,972, $0 and $183 respectively, Mr. Peters’ salary, bonus, stock awards,non-equity incentive plan compensation and all other compensation allocated to GPP for 2017 was $11,363, $3,409, $0, $0 and $63,157, and for 2016 was $15,004, $0, $21,825, $14,186 and $502 respectively, and Mr. Brigg’s salary, bonus, stock awards,non-equity incentive plan compensation and all other compensation allocated to GPP for 2017 was $15,150, $6,926, $25,031, $0 and $494, and for 2016 was $15,004, $0, $21,825, $16,226 and $483 respectively.
5)Mr. Neppl’s employment began on September 11, 2017.
6)Mr. Peters retired on September 11, 2017.
7)As this is the first time Mr. Simril has been considered a NEO, prior year compensation data is not provided.
8)Mr. Bleyl retired on December 31, 2017.65

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

NAME (1)

 

GRANT
DATE

 

ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER NON-

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS

(2)

 

ALL OTHER STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR UNITS
(#) (3)

 

GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE OF
STOCK AND
OPTION AWARDS  
($)

 

THRESHOLD

$

TARGET

$

MAXIMUM

$

 

  Todd Becker

 1,050,000 1,575,000 3,150,000 - -
 3/2/17 - - - 132,610 3,222,400

  John Neppl(4)

 200,000 320,000 800,000 - -
 9/11/17 - - - 32,172 600,000

  Jerry Peters(5)

 - - - - - -

  Kenneth Simril

 175,000 280,000 700,000 - -

  Jeff Briggs

 175,000 280,000 700,000 - -
 3/2/17 - - - 23,797 578,261

  Steve Bleyl(6)

 3/2/17 - - - 17,778 432,000

2023:
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
All Other
Stock
Awards
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Name (1)Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)


Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
Stock
Awards
($)
Todd Becker800,000 1,600,000 2,400,000 – – 
3/9/23(2)– – – 60,589 2,100,015 
3/9/23(3)– – – 30,295 60,589 121,178 2,100,015 
James Stark160,000 320,000 800,000 – – 
3/9/23(2)– – – 10,099 350,031 
3/9/23(3)– – – 5,050 10,099 20,198 350,031 
Grant Kadavy152,000 304,000 760,000 
3/9/23(2)10,099 350,031 
3/9/23(3)5,050 10,099 20,198 350,031 
Michelle Mapes168,000 336,000 840,000 – – 
3/9/23(2)– – – 8,656 300,017 
3/9/23(3)– – – 4,328 8,656 17,312 300,017 
Patrich Simpkins180,000 360,000 900,000 – – 
3/9/23(2)– – – 10,099 350,031 
3/9/23(3)– – – 5,050 10,099 20,198 350,031 
(1)Columns for “All other option awards: number of securities underlying options” and “Exercise or base price of option awards” have been omitted from this table because no compensation is reportable thereunder.
(2)Represents restricted stock awards granted in March 2023, which vest ratably over the three-year period following the date of grant.
(3)Represents performance share unit awards granted in March 2023, which cliff vest in March 2026 based on various performance criteria. Performance share unit awards are presented at fair value on the date of grant. See footnotes of the Summary Compensation Table for target and maximum performance share unit values.


661)Columns for “Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards,” “All other option awards: number of securities underlying options” and “Exercise or base price of option awards” have been omitted from this table because no compensation is reportable thereunder.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
2)SeeCompensation Discussion and Analysis for additional information about the Umbrella STIP.
3)This table includes equity awards granted in 2017 related to 2016 performance but does not include awards granted in 2018 for 2017 performance. Restricted stock awards granted in 2017 vest ratably, annually over the three-year period following the date of the grant.
4)Mr. Neppl joined the company on September 11, 2017.
5)Mr. Peters retired on September 11, 2017.
6)Mr. Bleyl retired on December 31, 2017.

Employment Agreements

Mr. Becker. Effective October 16, 2008, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Becker to serve as our President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Becker was named President and Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2009.Becker. Mr. Becker’s employment agreement was amended in December 2009 to provide for a taxgross-up payment in the event of any tax payments on fringe benefits. Mr. Becker’s agreement was subsequently amended in March 2018 to remove the excise taxgross-up payment. provision. In August 2023, we also entered into a change in control severance plan with Mr. Becker. The terms of the employment agreement provide that Mr. Becker will receive the following: (i) an annual base salary, currently at $525,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) annual awards of long-term incentive benefits of a type and level that is competitive withlong-term incentive plan benefits provided to chief executive officers of public companies of comparable size in similar industries, and (iv) a fully exercisable option to acquire 150,000 shares at an exercise price equal to $10 per share. Mr. Becker’s employment isat-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. Becker will receive one year of base salary plus the greater of his maximum annual cash bonus for that year or the average bonus paid for the prior two years, up to one year of continued health and dental coverage (which ceases upon acceptance of a comparable position within such period) and certain relocation assistance if he relocates beyond 50 miles within six months of termination. In addition, all shares acquired upon exercise of options granted therein would then be released from certainlock-up restrictions, and all outstanding options and other equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information.

Mr. Neppl. Effective September 11, 2017, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Neppl. The termsvest, provided however, if such termination occurs following a change of the employment agreement provide that Mr. Neppl will receive (i) an annual base salary, currently at $400,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in the long-term incentive program developed by us, (iv) aone-time restricted stock award grant of $600,000, and (v) other benefits that are generally available to our employees. Mr. Neppl’s employment isat-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. Neppl will receive six month’s base salary plus the greater ofone-half of the maximum bonus for that year orone-half of the average bonus paid in the prior two years, all outstanding equity awards would fully vest andcontrol, he will receive certain relocation assistance if he relocates beyond 50 miles within six monthsa severance multiple of termination. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change3 times his base salary, his target bonus in Control for additional information.

Mr. Peters. Effective October 24, 2008, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Peters. The termseffect under the STIP of the employment agreement provide that Mr. Peters will receive (i) an annual base salary, currently at $350,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentageCompany, up to 18-months of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in the long-term incentive program developed by us, and (iv) other benefits that are generally available to our employees. Mr. Peters’ employment wasat-will and could have been terminated at any time, by either party, for

any reason whatsoever. If employment was terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. Peters would have received six month’s base salary plus the greater ofone-half of the maximum bonus for that year or the average bonus paid in the prior two years and all outstanding equity awards would have fully vested. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information. Mr. Peters retired from the company effective September 11, 2017.

Mr. Simril. Mr. Simril joined the company as part of the Fleischmann’s Vinegar acquisition in 2016 and entered into an employment agreement effective September 30, 2016. The terms of the employment agreement provide for (i) an annual base salary, currently at $350,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in the long-term incentive program developed by us, and (iv) other benefits that are generally available to our employees. Mr. Simril’s employment isat-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. Simril will receive six month’s base salarycontinued health coverage, and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information.

Mr. Briggs.

Mr. Briggs joined usStark. Mr. Stark re-joined the Company in 2009January 2022 and entered into an employment agreement with us effective March 4, 2011.1, 2023. In August 2023, we also entered into a change in control severance plan with Mr. Stark. The employment agreement provides for (i) an annual base salary, currently at $350,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in a long-term incentive program developed by us, and (iv) participation in our benefit plans. Mr. Briggs’Stark’s employment isat-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. BriggsStark will receive six month’s base salary and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest, provided however, if such termination occurs following a change of control, he will receive a severance multiple of 2.5 times his base salary, his target bonus in effect under the STIP of the Company, up to 18-months of continued health coverage, and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information.

Mr. Bleyl.

Mr. Bleyl was named Executive Vice President – Ethanol Marketing in 2008 andKadavy. Effective October 3, 2022, we entered into an employment agreement with the company effective March 4, 2011.Mr. Kadavy. In August 2023, we entered into a change in control severance plan with Mr. Kadavy. The employment agreement provides for (i) aan annual base salary, currently at $300,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in a long-term incentive program developed by the company,us, and (iv) participation in Companyour benefit plans. Mr. Bleyl’sKadavy’s employment was“at-will”is at-will and could have beenmay be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment wasis terminated without Causecause or for Good Reason,good reason, Mr. Bleyl would have receivedKadavy will receive six month’s base salary and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest, provided however, if such termination occurs following a change of control, he will receive a severance multiple of 1.5 times his base salary, his target bonus in effect under the STIP of the Company, up to 18-months of continued health coverage, and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Change in Control for additional information.
Ms. Mapes. Ms. Mapes joined the Company in 2009 and entered into an employment agreement with us effective February 3, 2020. In August 2023, we also entered into a change in control severance plan with Mr. Mapes. The employment agreement provides for (i) an annual base salary, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in a long-term incentive program developed by us, and (iv) participation in our benefit plans. Ms. Mapes’ employment is at-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Ms. Mapes will receive six month’s base salary and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest, provided however, if such termination occurs following a change of control, she will receive a severance multiple of 2.5 times her base salary, her target bonus in effect under the STIP of the Company on the date of termination, up to 18-months of continued health coverage, and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION67
Mr. Bleyl retired fromSimpkins. Effective May 7, 2012, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Simpkins. In August 2023, we also entered into a change in control severance plan with Mr. Simpkins. The terms of the employment agreement provide that Mr. Simpkins will receive (i) an annual base salary, currently at $450,000, (ii) an annual target bonus as a percentage of base salary based on performance objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee, (iii) participation in the long-term incentive program developed by the Company, (iv) equity incentive compensation grants totaling 50,000 shares, and (v) other benefits that are generally available to company effective December 31, 2017.

employees. Mr. Simpkins’ employment is at-will and may be terminated at any time, by either party, for any reason whatsoever. If employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, Mr. Simpkins will receive six months base salary and all outstanding equity awards shall fully vest, provided however, if such termination occurs following a change of control, he will receive a severance multiple of 2.5 times his base salary, his target bonus in effect under the STIP of the Company, up to 18-months of continued health coverage, and all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for additional information.

See Compensation Discussion and Analysis for further details on 20172023 performance objectives.

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to unexercised options, stock that has not vestedawards and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer that have not vested and are outstanding as of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

      OPTION AWARDS (2) STOCK AWARDS (2) 
NAME (1) 

GRANT     

DATE     

 

NUMBER OF     

SECURITIES     

UNDERLYING     

UNEXERCISED     

OPTIONS (#)     

EXERCISABLE     

 

NUMBER OF     

SECURITIES     

UNDERLYING     

UNEXERCISED     

OPTIONS (#)     

UNEXERCISABLE     

 

OPTION     

EXERCISE     

PRICE     

($)     

 

OPTION     

EXPIRATION     

DATE     

 

NUMBER

OF

SHARES

OR

UNITS

OF

STOCK

THAT

HAVE

NOT

VESTED

(#)

  

MARKET   

VALUE   

OF   

SHARES   

OR   

UNITS   

OF   

STOCK   

THAT   

HAVE   

NOT   

VESTED   

($)   

 

 

Todd Becker

 

 

12/22/09     

 

 

100,000     

 

 

-     

 

 

12.48     

 

 

12/22/19     

 

 

 

 

-        

 

 

 

 

 

 

  -    

 

 

  2/6/15      -      -      -      -         38,949      656,291 
  2/12/16      -      -      -      -       148,478   2,501,854 
  3/2/17      -      -      -      -       132,610   2,234,479 
  

John Neppl

 9/11/17      -      -      -      -         32,172     542,098 
  

Jerry Peters(3)

 -      -      -      -      -       -               -     
  

Kenneth Simril

 10/3/16      -      -      -      -         12,839      216,337 
  

Jeff Briggs

 11/23/09      18,750      -      11.75      11/23/19       -               -     
  2/6/15      -      -      -      -           7,538      127,015 
  2/12/16      -      -      -      -         24,746      416,970 
  3/2/17      -      -      -      -         23,797      400,979 
  

Steve Bleyl(4)

 -      -      -      -      -       -   - 

2023:
Stock Awards
Restricted Stock AwardsPerformance Share Units (1)
NameNumber of Shares
or Units of Stock
that have
not Vested
(#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
that have
not Vested
($) (2)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
that have not
Vested (#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Value
of Shares
or Units of Stock
that have not
Vested ($) (2)
Todd Becker2/18/21(3)68,566 1,729,235 68,566 1,729,235 
3/14/22(4)45,835 1,155,959 68,753 1,733,951 
3/9/23(5)60,589 1,528,055 60,589 1,528,055 
James Stark1/10/22(6)4,781 120,577 --
3/9/23(5)10,099 254,697 10,099 254,697 
Grant Kadavy10/3/22(6)5,510 138,962 --
3/9/23(5)10,099 254,697 10,099 254,697 
Michelle Mapes2/18/21(3)13,186 332,551 13,186 332,551 
3/14/22(4)7,448 187,839 11,173 281,783 
3/9/23(5)8,656 218,304 8,656 218,304 
Patrich Simpkins2/18/21(3)26,372 665,102 26,372 665,102 
3/14/22(4)10,313 260,094 15,470 390,153 
3/9/23(5)10,099 254,697 10,099 254,697 
(1)Reflects the target number of performance share units granted. Performance share awards granted in 2023, 2022 and 2021 cliff-vest three years following the grant date based on attainment of performance goals.
(2)The closing stock price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2023 of $25.22 was used to calculate the market value of shares and units that have not vested.
(3)The February 18, 2021 restricted stock awards cliff vest three years following the date of grant. The PSUs cliff vest three years following the date of grant, subject to attainment of performance goals.
(4)The March 14, 2022 restricted stock awards vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The PSUs cliff vest three years following the date of grant, subject to attainment of performance goals.
(5)The March 9, 2023 restricted stock awards vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The PSUs cliff vest three years following the date of grant, subject to attainment of performance goals.
(6)Messr. Stark and Kadavy were awarded shares at the time of hiring, which vest ratably over the three-year period following the date of grant.


681)Columns related to “Equity incentive plan awards” have been omitted because no compensation is reportable thereunder.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
2)Restricted stock awards granted in 2017, 2016 and 2015 vest ratably, annually over the three-year period following the date of grant. Stock options and restricted stock awards granted prior to 2015 vested 25% immediately and vest another 25% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, resulting in a three-year vesting term. Our closing stock price at December 29, 2017 of $16.85 was used to calculate the market value of shares that have not vested.
3)All unvested shares held by Mr. Peters vested upon retirement on September 11, 2017.
4)All unvested shares held by Mr. Bleyl vested upon retirement on December  31, 2017.

Option Exercises and

Stock Vested

The following table lists the number of shares acquired and the value realized as a result of option exercisesany restricted stock that vested by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and2023:
Stock Awards
Name (1)Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
Todd Becker (2)295,404 9,219,761 
James Stark (3)2,391 76,153 
Grant Kadavy (4)2,755 79,399 
Michelle Mapes (5)51,935 1,620,611 
Patrich Simpkins (6)68,037 2,123,355 
(1)The columns for "Option Awards" have been omitted from this table because no compensation is reportable thereunder.
(2)Value is determined based on the valueclosing prices of anyour Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On March 14, 2023, the Company withheld 10,165 shares of the 22,918 shares of restricted stock that vested duringon that date. On March 18, 2023, the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

   

 

OPTION AWARDS

 

 

 

STOCK AWARDS

 

NAME 

 

NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON   
EXERCISE

(#)

 

VALUE
REALIZED ON   
EXERCISE

($)

 

 

NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
VESTING

(#)

 

VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING

($)

 

   Todd Becker (1)

 - - 140,506 3,356,735

   John Neppl

 - - - -

   Jerry Peters (2)

 - -   57,660 1,201,359

   Kenneth Simril (3)

 - -     6,422    132,293

   Jeff Briggs (4)

 - -   23,737    566,080

   Steve Bleyl (5)

 - -   62,581 1,192,428

(1)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On February 6, 2017, the company withheld 12,722 shares of the 38,950 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 7, 2017, the company withheld 12,155 shares of the 27,316 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 12, 2017, the company withheld 36,601 shares of the 74,240 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
Company withheld 54,187 shares of the 122,180 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On March 18, 2023, the Company withheld 66,661 shares of the 150,306 shares of performance stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.

(2)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On February 6, 2017, the company withheld 2,644 shares of the 7,539 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 7, 2017, the company withheld 1,767 shares of the 5,463 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 12, 2017, the company withheld 4,003 shares of the 12,374 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On September 11, 2017, the company withheld 14,585 shares of the 32,284 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
(3)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On October 3, 2017, the company withheld 2,278 shares of the 6,422 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
(4)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On February 6, 2017, the company withheld 2,643 shares of the 7,539 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 7, 2017, the company withheld 1,237 shares of the 3,824 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 12, 2017, the company withheld 4,003 shares of the 12,374 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
(5)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On February 6, 2017, the company withheld 2,555 shares of the 7,225 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 7, 2017, the company withheld 1,409 shares of the 4,370 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On February 12, 2017, the company withheld 2,803 shares of the 8,662 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On December 31, 2017, the company withheld 17,883 shares of the 42,324 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.

(3)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On January 10, 2023, the Company withheld 1,188 shares of the 2,391 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.

(4)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On October 3, 2023, the Company withheld 1,222 shares of the 2,755 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO's tax withholding obligations.
(5)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On March 14, 2023, the Company withheld 1,712 shares of the 3,725 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date. On March 18, 2023, the Company withheld 9,934 shares of the 21,617 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On March 18, 2022, the Company withheld 13,185 shares of the 26,593 shares of performance stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
(6)Value is determined based on the closing prices of our Common Stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares that vested on such dates. On March 14, 2023, the Company withheld 2,288 shares of the 5,157 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date. On March 18, 2023, the Company withheld 12,505 shares of the 28,195 shares of restricted stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations. On March 18, 2023, the Company withheld 15,383 shares of the 34,685 shares of performance stock that vested on that date to satisfy the NEO’s tax withholding obligations.
Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change ofin Control

Employment Agreement for Mr. Becker

We have an employment agreement with Mr. Becker. See Employment ArrangementsAgreements above for additional information. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, Mr. Becker is entitled to (a) one year of base salary plus the greater of his maximum annual cash bonus for that year or the average bonus paid for the prior two years, (b) up to one year of continued health and dental coverage (which ceases upon acceptance of a comparable position within such period) and (c) certain relocation assistance if he relocates beyond 50 miles within six months of termination. In addition, all shares acquired upon exercise of options granted therein would then be released from certainlock-up restrictions and all outstanding options and other equity awards would fully vest.

The employment agreement also containsvest, including PSUs which settle at target. If termination occurs following agross-up provision to address any excess parachute payments resulting under Section 280G change of the Internal Revenue Code. In the event any severance benefits provided tocontrol, Mr. Becker subject himis entitled to (a) severance multiple of 3 times his base salary (b) 3 times his target bonus in effect under the excise tax imposed under Section 4999Company's STIP (c) up to 18-months of the Internal Revenue Code, we will pay Mr. Becker the amount necessary to make up for the excise tax on excess parachute paymentscontinued health coverage and income and payroll taxes on the excise tax.

(d) all outstanding equity awards would fully vest.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION69
For such purposes, cause is defined as one of the following: (a) a material breach by the executive of the terms of this agreement, not cured within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from the Board of such breach, (b) conviction of, or plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony; (c) willful misconduct or gross negligence in connection with the performance of executive’s duties; or (d) willfully engaging in conduct that constitutes fraud, gross negligence or gross misconduct that results in material harm to us. For purposes of this definition, no act, or failure to act, on the executive’s part shall be considered willful unless done, or omitted to be done, by the executive in knowing bad faith and without reasonable belief that his action or omission was in, or not opposed to, our best interests. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the executive shall not be deemed to have been terminated for cause unless and until the executive has received a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than three-quarters of the entire membership of the Board at a meeting called and held for such purpose (after reasonable notice to the executive and an opportunity for the executive, together with his counsel, to be heard by the Board), finding that, in the good faith opinion of the Board, the executive is guilty of the conduct set forth above in (a), (b), (c) or (d) of this definition and specifying the particulars thereof in detail.

For such purposes, good reason is defined as any of the following if the same occurs without the executive’s express written consent: (a) a material diminution in executive’s base salary as described in the employment agreement; (b) a material diminution in executive’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (c) a material diminution in the authority, duties, or responsibilities of the person to whom the executive is required to report; (d) a material change in the geographic location at which the executive must perform the services (for this purpose, any relocation of more than 50 miles is deemed a material change); (e) any material reduction or other adverse change in the executive’s benefits under any applicable and properly approved compensation plan or arrangement without the substitution of comparable benefits; or (f) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by us under the employment agreement. To terminate for good reason, the executive must incur a termination of employment on or before the second anniversary of the initial existence of the condition.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Neppl

On September 11, 2017, we entered intoStark

We have an employment agreement with Mr. Neppl.Stark. See Employment Arrangements above for additional information. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, he will receive an amount equal to six months base salary plus the greater ofone-half of the maximum bonus for that year orone-half of the average bonus paid in the prior two years and all outstanding equity awards will fully vest. The definitions for cause and good reason are the same as described above for Mr. Becker.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Peters

We had an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Peters, effective on October 24, 2008. See Employment Arrangements above for additional information. All terms and conditions were satisfied upon Mr. Peters’ retirement on September 11, 2017.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Simril

On September 30, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Simril. See Employment ArrangementsAgreements above for additional information. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, he will receive an amount equal to six months base salary and all outstanding equity awards will fully vest, including PSUs which settle at target. If termination occurs following a change of control, Mr. Stark is entitled to (a) severance multiple of 2.5 times his base salary (b) 2.5 times his target bonus in effect under the Company's STIP (c) up to 18-months of continued health coverage and (d) all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. The definitions for cause and good reason are the same as described above for Mr. Becker, except that the definition of good reason for Mr. Simril does not specify the distance for an applicable relocation.

Becker.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Briggs

Kadavy

On March 4, 2011,October 3, 2022, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Briggs.Kadavy. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, he will receive an amount equal to six months base salary and all outstanding equity awards will fully vest, including PSUs which settle at target. If termination occurs following a change of control, Mr. Kadavy is entitled to (a) severance multiple of 1.5 times his base salary (b) 1.5 times his target bonus in effect under the Company's STIP (c) up to 18-months of continued health coverage and (d) all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. The definitions for cause and good reason are the same as described above for Mr. Becker.
Employment Agreement for Ms. Mapes
We have an employment agreement with Ms. Mapes. See Employment ArrangementsAgreements above for additional information. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, she will receive an amount equal to six months base salary and all outstanding equity awards will fully vest, including PSUs which settle at target. If termination occurs following a change of control, Ms. Mapes is entitled to (a) severance multiple of 2.5 times his base salary (b) 2.5 times his target bonus in effect under the Company's STIP (c) up to 18-months of continued health coverage and (d) all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. The definitions for cause and good reason are the same as described above for Mr. Becker.


70
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Employment Agreement for Mr. Simpkins
We have an employment agreement with Mr. Simpkins. See Employment Agreements above for additional information. Upon termination without cause or for good reason, he will receive an amount equal to six months base salary and all outstanding equity awards will fully vest, including PSUs which settle at target. If termination occurs following a change of control, Mr. Simpkins is entitled to (a) severance multiple of 2.5 times his base salary (b) 2.5 times his target bonus in effect under the Company's STIP (c) up to 18-months of continued health coverage and (d) all outstanding equity awards would fully vest. The definitions for cause and good reason are the same as described above for Mr. Becker, except that the definition of good reason for Mr. BriggsSimpkins does not specify the distance for an applicable relocation.

Employment Agreement for Mr. Bleyl

We had an employment agreement with Mr. Bleyl, effective on March 4, 2011. See Employment Arrangements above for additional information. All terms

Equity Acceleration
2009 and conditions were satisfied upon Mr. Bleyl’s retirement on December 31, 2017.

Equity Acceleration

20072019 Equity Incentive Plan.Plans. Awards outstanding under the 20072009 and 2019 Equity Incentive PlanPlans will fully vest upon a change in control unless (a) if not fully converted and assumed, or (b) if the awards are converted and assumed, after a qualifying termination. Qualifying termination is defined as a termination of employment within twenty-four months following a change in control (i) by us other than for cause, gross negligence, or deliberate misconduct which demonstrably harms us or (ii) by the successor corporation; (b) replaced with a cash retention program providingparticipant for good reason, if it is defined in the same valueapplicable award agreement or (c) otherwise limited by the plan administrator.employment agreement. A change in control shall be deemed to have occurred if in a single transaction or series of related transactions:

(a) any person (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), or persons acting as a group, other than a trustee or fiduciary holding securities under an employment benefit program, is or becomes a beneficial owner (as defined in Rule13-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly of securities representing 51% or more of our combined voting power;

(b) there is a merger, consolidation, or other business combination transaction with or into another corporation, entity or person, other than a transaction in which the holders of at least a majority of our shares of voting capital stock outstanding immediately prior to such transaction continue to hold (either by such shares remaining outstanding or by their being converted into shares of voting capital stock of the surviving entity) a majority of the total voting power represented by the shares of voting capital stock of the company (or surviving entity) outstanding immediately after such transaction; or

(c) all or substantially all of our assets are sold.

2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. Awards outstanding under the Plan will fully vest upon a change in control (a) if not fully converted and assumed, (b) if the awards are converted and assumed, after a qualifying termination, or (c) by the participant for good reason, if it is defined in the applicable award agreement or employment agreement. Qualifying termination is defined as a termination of employment within twenty-four months following a change in control or by us other than for cause, gross negligence, or deliberate misconduct which demonstrably harms us. A change in control shall be deemed to have occurred if in a single transaction or series of related transactions:

(a) any person (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act), or persons acting as a group, other than a trustee or fiduciary holding securities under an employment benefit program, is or becomes a beneficial owner (as defined in Rule13-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly of securities representing 51% or more of our combined voting power;

(b) there is a merger, consolidation, or other business combination transaction with or into another corporation, entity or person, other than a transaction in which the holders of at least a majority of the shares of voting capital stock outstanding immediately prior to such transaction continue to hold (either by such shares remaining outstanding or by their being converted into shares of voting capital stock of the surviving entity) a majority of the total voting power represented by the shares of voting capital stock of the company (or surviving entity) outstanding immediately after such transaction;

(c) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who, at the beginning of such period, constitute the Board together with any new director(s) (other than a director designated by a person who entered into an agreement with us

to effect a transaction described in (a) or (b) above) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by our shareholders was approved by a vote of at leasttwo-thirds of the directors still in office, who either were directors at the beginning of thetwo-year period or whose election or nomination for election was previously approved, cease for any reason to constitute a majority thereof; or

(d) all or substantially all of our assets are sold.

The option award agreement also provides that if an executive is terminated without cause, the option will be deemed to have vested through the next annual anniversary of the grant date.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION71
The following tables provide information on potential benefits that could be received by the NEOs with employment agreements upon a termination without cause or for good reason and in connection with a change in control. As it is unlikely that the amount payable to each NEO under the performance cash award can be determined, the performance cash would fully vest based on the Committee’s assessment of actual performance through the termination date. Unless equity awards are not assumed by a buyer, change in control benefits only are paid when there is a “double trigger event” i.e. both the change in control along with a qualifying termination of the executive. The tables assume a termination or change in control. The tables assume terminationof control of each officer’s employment as of the close of business on December 31, 2017.2023. The closing price of our Common Stock on the last trading day of 20172023 was $16.85. Post-termination$25.22. Post-termination health care represents the approximate value of such benefits. Upon
Termination
Without Cause
or For Good
Reason
($)
Change In
Control
($)
Todd Becker
Termination Compensation
Base Salary and Bonus (1)3,200,0007,200,000
Equity Vesting (2)9,404,4889,404,488
Benefits and Perquisites
Post-Termination Health Care (3)32,61048,915
Certain Relocation Benefits (4)
Total12,637,09816,653,403
(1)For termination without cause or for good reason, it represents one year of base salary plus a bonus equal to the greater of his maximum bonus for that year or the average of his bonuses during the prior two years. For change in control, it represents the annual base salary plus target bonus multiplied by three.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and release of restrictions on such awards. Assumes PSUs are settled at target.
(3)In the event of termination without cause or for good reason, would represent up to 12 months of continued health coverage. In the event of a change in control, would represent up to 18 months of continued health coverage.
(4)Relocation assistance in the executive may be subject to certain excise taxes imposed by Section 4999event of the Internal Revenue Code on any excess parachute payments under Section 280G. As discussed above, we have agreed to reimburse Mr. Beckertermination without cause or for all such excise taxes and any income and excise taxes that are payable by the executive asgood reason, or for a result of any such reimbursements. Currently, amounts shown as compensation related totermination following a change in control do not trigger excise taxesif relocation is more than 50 miles beyond Omaha, Nebraska within six months of such time. The value of such assistance cannot be determined until such an event occurs.
Termination
Without Cause
or For Good
Reason
($)
Change In
Control
($)
James Stark
Termination Compensation
Base Salary and Bonus (1)200,000 1,800,000 
Equity Vesting (2)629,970 629,970 
Benefits and Perquisites
Post-Termination Health Care (3)— 14,961 
Total829,970 2,444,931 
(1)For termination without cause or for excess parachute payments;good reason, it represents a payment of six months base salary. For change in control, it represents the annual base salary plus target bonus multiplied by 2.5.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and thereforerelease of restrictions on such awards. Assumes PSUs are not includedsettled at target.
(3)In the event of a change in the tables below.

   

 

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

 

   

 

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

 

 

Todd Becker

    

Termination Compensation

          

Base Salary and Bonus(1)

   3,675,000    —     

Equity Vesting(2)

   5,392,624    5,392,624 

Benefits and Perquisites

          

Post-Termination Health Care

   24,499    —     

Certain Relocation Benefits(3)

          

Total

   9,092,123    5,392,624 

control, would represent up to 18 months of continued health coverage.


(1)Assumes a bonus of the greater of his maximum bonus for that year or the average of his bonuses during the prior two years.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards and release of restrictions on such awards.
(3)Relocation assistance in the event of termination without cause or for good reason, or for a termination following a change in control if relocation is more than 50 miles beyond Omaha, Nebraska within six months of such time. The value of such assistance cannot be determined until such an event occurs.

   

 

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

 

   

 

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

 

 

 

John Neppl

    

Termination Compensation

          

Base Salary and Bonus(1)

   600,000       

Equity Vesting(2)

   542,098      542,098 

Total

   1,142,098      542,098 

(1)Assumes a bonus of the greater ofone-half of his maximum bonus for that year orone-half the average of his bonuses during the prior two years.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards and release of restrictions on such awards.

72

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

Jerry Peters(1)

Termination Compensation

Base Salary and Bonus

—  

Equity Vesting

—  

Total

—  

(1)Mr. Peters retired on September 11, 2017.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

   

 

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

 

   

 

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

 

 

Kenneth Simril

    

Termination Compensation

          

Base Salary

   175,000       

Equity Vesting(1)

   216,337      216,337 

Total

   391,337      216,337 

Termination
Without Cause
or For Good
Reason
($)
Change In
Control
($)
Grant Kadavy
Termination Compensation
Base Salary (1)190,000 1,026,000 
Equity Vesting (2)648,356 648,356 
Benefits and Perquisites
Post-Termination Health Care (3)— 19,733 
Total838,356 1,694,089 
(1)For termination without cause or for good reason, it represents a payment of six months base salary. For change in control, it represents the annual base salary plus target bonus multiplied by 1.5.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and release of restrictions on such awards. Assumes PSUs are settled at target.
(3)In the event of a change in control, would represent up to 18 months of continued health coverage.
Termination
Without Cause
or For Good
Reason
($)
Change In
Control
($)
Michelle Mapes
Termination Compensation
Base Salary (1)210,000 1,890,000 
Equity Vesting (2)1,571,332 1,571,332 
Benefits and Perquisites
Post-Termination Health Care (3)— 8,423 
Total1,781,332 3,469,755 
(1)For termination without cause or for good reason, it represents a payment of six months base salary. For change in control, it represents the annual base salary plus target bonus multiplied by 2.5.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and release of restrictions on such awards. Assumes PSUs are settled at target.
(3)In the event of a change in control, would represent up to 18 months of continued health coverage.
Termination
Without Cause
or For Good
Reason
($)
Change In
Control
($)
Patrich Simpkins
Termination Compensation
Base Salary and Bonus (1)225,000 2,025,000 
Equity Vesting (2)2,489,845 2,489,845 
Benefits and Perquisites
Post-Termination Health Care (3)— 17,471 
Total2,714,845 4,532,316 
(1)For termination without cause or for good reason, it represents a payment of six months base salary. For change in control, it represents the annual base salary plus target bonus multiplied by 2.5.
(2)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards, including PSUs and release of restrictions on such awards. Assumes PSUs are settled at target.
(3)In the event of a change in control, would represent up to 18 months of continued health coverage.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION(1)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards and release of restrictions on such awards.73

   

 

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

 

   

 

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

 

 

Jeff Briggs

    

Termination Compensation

          

Base Salary

   175,000       

Equity Vesting(1)

   944,964      944,964 

Total

   1,119,964      944,964 

(1)Represents accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards and release of restrictions on such awards.

TERMINATION
WITHOUT CAUSE
OR FOR GOOD
REASON ($)

CHANGE IN

CONTROL ($)

Steve Bleyl(1)

Termination Compensation

Base Salary

—  

Equity Vesting

—  

Total

—  

(1)Mr. Bleyl retired on December 31, 2017.

Compensation Risk Assessment

With the help of its compensation consultant, in 2017 the Compensation Committee reviewed our executive compensation policies and practices, and determined that our executive compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. The Compensation Committee also reviewed our compensation programs for certain design features which have been identified by experts as having the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking, with none being identified in our programs.

Moreover, the Compensation Committee determined that, for all employees, ournon-executive compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation, as these programs are fully discretionary after performance for the relevant period has been achieved, recommended by senior management to the Compensation Committee and reviewed at such time to support our goals and objectives.

Chief Executive Officer

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employeesmedian employee and the annual total compensation of Mr. Todd Becker, our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”).

For 2017,2023, our last completed fiscal year:

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (othermedian employee, other than our CEO)CEO, was $66,535;$93,468; and
The annual total compensation of our CEO was $4,515,560.$5,850,594.

Based on this information, for 20172023 the ratio of annual total compensation of Mr. Becker, our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employeesour median employee was 6863 to 1.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees,employee, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:

1.We determined that, as of December 31, 2017, the last day of our payroll, our employee population consisted of approximately 1,344 individuals with all of these individuals located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time and temporary employees however it excluded employees from the 2017 acquisitions of the cattle feedlots in Hereford TX, Leoti KS, and Eckley CO.

2.To identify the median employee from our employee population, we calculated the amount of salary, and wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records and reported to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable wages. We also annualized the compensation for any full-time employees that were not employed by us for all of 2017. We believe the use of total cash compensation for all employees is a consistently applied compensation measure because we do not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees as only approximately six percent of our employees receive annual equity awards.

3.We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. Since all our employees are located in the United States, as is our CEO, we did not make anycost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee.”

4.Once we identified our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in total compensation of $66,535. The difference between such employee’s salary, wages and overtime pay and the employee’s annual total compensation represents the estimated value of such employee’s health care benefits.

5.With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2017 Summary Compensation Table include in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference under Item 11 of Part III of our Annual Report. To maintain consistency between the annual total compensation of our CEO and the median employee, we added the estimated value of our CEO’s health care benefits, estimated at $10,553
1.We determined that, as of December 31, 2023, the last day of our payroll, our total employee population consisted of 907 individuals with all these individuals located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time and temporary employees.
2.To identify the median employee from our employee population, we calculated the amount of salary, and other wages of our employees as reflected in our payroll records and reported to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable wages. We annualized the compensation for any full-time employees that were not employed by us for all of 2023.
3.We identified our median employee using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. Since all our employees are in the United States, as is our CEO, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee.”
4.Once we identified our median employee, we combined all the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2023 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in total compensation of $93,468. The difference between such employee’s salary, wages and overtime pay and the employee’s annual total compensation represents the estimated value of such employee’s health care benefits.
5.With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2023 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference under Item 11 of Part III of our Annual Report. To maintain consistency between the annual total compensation of our CEO and the median employee, we added the estimated value of our CEO’s health care benefits, estimated at $14,145, to the amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table. This resulted in annual total compensation for purposes of determining the ratio in the amount of $4,515,560, which exceeds the amount reported for him in the Summary Compensation Table by $10,553.

Compensation of Directors

Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, we compensate ournon-employee directors through a retainer structure for knowledge of us and the industry in which we operate, serving in a stewardship role, preparing for and attending Board and committee meetings, and serving as a committee Chairman. During 2017, eachnon-employee director was paid $75,000 for serving on the Board, including serving on Board committees. In addition, the Chairman of the Board received $20,000, the Audit Committee Chairman received $20,000, the Compensation Committee Chairman received $10,000 and the Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman received $4,000. Additionally, annual individual restricted stock grants were awarded equal to $125,000 in value, as measured on the date of grant. Board members are also reimbursed for travel and other business-related expenses. The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for its directors at five times their annual cash retainer, or $375,000.

The Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer an independent consultant during 2016 to evaluate ournon-employee director compensation program and provide recommendations for appropriate changes, if any, to achieve market-competitiveness and consistency with recognized corporate governance best practices. With an objective that total compensation for allnon-employee directors would be awarded within a rangethe purpose of determining the 50th to 75th percentile of industry compensation defined by our peer group analysis and other methodologies consistent with industry practice, in 2016, the Board approved an increaseratio in the annual individual restricted stock grants from $100,000 to $125,000.

On May 11, 2017,amount of $5,850,594, which exceeds the company’snon-employee directors each received a grant of 4,940 shares of restricted stock with an award value of $125,000 pursuant toamount reported for him in the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Equity Plan”). The award vests and shares of Common Stock are issued after one year.

As an employee, Mr. Becker does not receive director compensation. See Summary Compensation Table for information on his compensation.

by $14,145.



74
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Pay vs. Performance Comparison
As discussed in the CD&A above, our Compensation Committee has implemented an executive compensation program designed to link a sustainable portion of our NEOs' realized compensation to the achievement of the Company's financial, operational and strategic objectives, and to align pay with changes in the value of our shareholders' investments. The following table sets forth certainadditional information regardingfor our NEOs, calculated in accordance with SEC rules, for 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on:(in thousands)
Fiscal YearSummary Compensation Table Total for CEO ($) (1)Compensation Actually Paid to CEO ($) (2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs ($) (3)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs ($) (2) (3)Total Shareholder ReturnPeer Group Total Shareholder Return (4)Net Loss ($)EBITDA ($) (5)
20235,836,449 7,773,416 1,347,643 1,607,749 195 249 (76,299)54,031 
20225,861,036 7,517,035 1,292,677 1,425,134 236 276 (103,377)26,710 
20215,864,530 19,817,063 1,406,008 3,550,754 269 396 (44,146)116,795 
20203,081,617 4,693,256 870,074 1,264,783 102 406 (89,654)(15,296)
(1)The dollar amounts reported are the fees earnedamounts of total compensation reported for our CEO, Mr. Becker, in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal years 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Mr. Becker served as CEO for each of the years presented.
(2)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid,” as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation paid to our CEO or paid in cash and stockother NEOs during the applicable year, but also include (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date the awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year.
(3)For 2023, reflects compensation information for our NEOs, other than our CEO, as described in the CD&A of this Proxy Statement. For 2022, reflects compensation information for Mr. Stark, Ms. Mapes, Mr. Osowski, Mr. Simpkins and Mr. van der Meulen. For 2021, reflects compensation information for Ms. Mapes, Mr. Simpkins and Mr. van der Meulen, as well as Mr. Kolomaya, the Company's former CAO and Mr. Cronin, the Company's former CCO. For 2020, reflects compensation information for Ms. Mapes and Mr. Simpkins, as well as Mr. Kolomaya, the Company's former CAO and Mr. Cronin, the Company's former COO.
(4)Reflects cumulative total shareholder return of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy (CELS) index as of December 31, 2023, weighted according to the constituent companies’ market capitalization at the beginning of each outside director duringperiod for which a return is indicated. The CELS is the peer group used by the Company for purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
(5)EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization excluding amortization of right-to-use assets and debt issuance costs. EBITDA is a key financial metric, which the Company believes reflects the efforts of executive management achievements. See the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

 

NAME

 

 

 

FEES EARNED
OR PAID IN CASH

($)

 

   

 

STOCK
AWARDS

($)(1)

 

   

 

OPTION
AWARDS

($)

 

   

 

ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION

($)

 

   

 

TOTAL

($)

 

 

Wayne Hoovestol, Chairman

  95,000    125,000    —        —        220,000 

Jim Anderson

  75,000    125,000    —        —        200,000 

James Crowley

  95,000    125,000    —        —        220,000 

Gene Edwards

  75,000    125,000    —        —        200,000 

Gordon Glade

  75,000    125,000    —        —        200,000 

Ejnar Knudsen

  75,000    125,000    —        —        200,000 

Thomas Manuel

  75,000    125,000    —        —        200,000 

Brian Peterson

  79,000    125,000    —        —        204,000 

Alain Treuer

  85,000    125,000    —        —        210,000 
2023, filed with the SEC on February 9, 2024, for a reconciliation of net loss on a GAAP basis to EBITDA.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION(1)Amounts for “Stock awards” reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of annual restricted stock grants pursuant to the Plan computed in accordance with ASC 718. On May 13, 2017, ournon-employee directors, received a grant of restricted stock with an award value of $125,000. This grant represents noncash compensation for Board service for the year following that date.75

To calculate the amounts in the Compensation Actually Paid columns in the table above, in accordance with SEC rules, the following adjustments were made:
2023202220212020
CEOAverage for Non-CEO NEOsCEOAverage for Non-CEO NEOsCEOAverage for Non-CEO NEOsCEOAverage for Non-CEO NEOs
Adjustments for CEO and Average for Non-CEO NEOs:
Total Compensation as reported above$5,836,449 $1,347,643 $5,861,036 $1,292,677 $5,864,530 $1,406,008 $3,081,617 $870,074 
Fair value of awards granted during the fiscal year3,056,109 418,349 4,193,933 547,109 4,766,708 944,195 3,218,221 584,544 
Year over year increase (decrease) of unvested awards granted in prior years(1,329,081)(178,521)(1,625,156)(274,352)7,962,822 1,090,434 (597,609)(91,315)
Increase (decrease) from prior fiscal year-end for awards that vested during the year209,939 20,278 (912,778)(140,300)1,836,856 199,546 (386,249)(44,590)
Decrease from prior fiscal year-end for awards that forfeited during the year– – – – (613,853)(89,429)(622,724)(53,930)
Compensation Actually Paid$7,773,416 $1,607,749 $7,517,035 $1,425,134 $19,817,063 $3,550,754 $4,693,256 $1,264,783 


76
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay Versus Performance Table
In accordance with SEC rules, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the pay versus performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid and EBITDA
The following graphic depicts the relationship between EBITDA and compensation actually paid (CAP) to the Company's CEO and NEOs, respectively.
03_429139-3_barchart_ceovsebitda.jpg
03_429139-3_bar_neopayvsebitda.jpg

Compensation Actually Paid and Relative Total Shareholder Return
The following graphic depicts the relationship between total shareholder return (TSR) and CAP to the Company's CEO and NEOs, respectively.
03_429139-3_barchart_ceovstsr.jpg
03_429139-3_barchart_neovstsr.jpg

Performance Measures
The following table presents the most important performance measures used by the Company to link CAP to our CEO and Non-CEO NEOs to the Company's performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
Performance Measures Used to Link Executive Compensation to Company Performance
EBITDA
Net Income (Loss)
Safety and Environmental
Renewable Corn Oil, Protein and Ethanol Yields
Run Rate
ESG - ISS Scoring


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION77
Equity Compensation Plans

Plan Information

The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 20172023, with respect to our equity compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance, aggregated by (i) all compensation plans previously approved by our security holders, and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by our security holders. The table includes:

the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and granted non-vested stock;
the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding options and granted non-vested stock; and
the number of securities that remain available for future issuance under the plans.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities To
Be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (A)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
($)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
For Future Issuance
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(A))(1)
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders
404,740(2)1,393,800 
Total404,740 1,393,800 
(1)The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan as option grants, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, direct share issuances and other stock-based awards is 5,710,000 shares of our Common Stock, which includes shares remaining under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan that were rolled into the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan in 2019.
(2)Reflects 404,740 PSUs with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $30.51, representing the target number of performance share units outstanding on December 31, 2023.


78the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and grantednon-vested stock;

the weighted-average exercise price of the outstanding options and grantednon-vested stock; and

the number of securities that remain available for future issuance under the plans.

PLAN CATEGORY

 

 

NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO
BE ISSUED UPON EXERCISE
OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS (a)

 

  

 

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS

($)

 

  

 

NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE
FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE
(EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (a))

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

143,750

 

 

 (1) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,362,267 

 

 

 

 

             

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

143,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.44

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,362,267 

 

 

 

 

(1)The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan, prior to the Amendment proposed in Proposal 2, as option grants, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, direct share issuances and other stock-based awards is 3,000,000 shares of our Common Stock, plus shares remaining under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan that were rolled into the Plan in 2009.
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

and Management

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table and notes set forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock based on Schedule 13G or Schedule 13D filings, as the case may be, as of March 15, 2018,13, 2024, by each person or group within the meaning of Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act who is known to our management to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding Common Stock and is based upon information provided to us by those persons.

 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF

BENEFICIAL OWNER

 

  

 

AMOUNT AND NATURE OF        

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP        

 

   

 

PERCENT        

OF CLASS (1)         

 

 

 

Blackrock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   5,245,101    12.8%   

 

Point72 Asset Management, L.P.(3)

72 Cummings Point Road

Stamford, CT 06902

   3,893,354    9.5%   

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One

Austin, TX 78746

   3,514,344    8.6%   

 

Van Eck Associates Corporation(5)

666 Third Avenue, 9th Floor

New York, NY 10017

   3,468,102    8.5%   

 

Daruma Capital Management, LLC(6)

626 King Avenue

Bronx, NY 10464

   3,452,925    8.4%   

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(7)

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

   2,996,240    7.3%   

 

DNB Asset Management AS(8)

Dronning Aufemias Gate 30, ByggM-12N

0191 Oslo, Norway

   2,156,899    5.3%   

 

State Street Corporation(9)

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

   2,100,972    5.1%   

(1)Percentage calculated based on 40,931,456 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 15, 2018.
(2)BlackRock Inc. – filed on January 19, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over 5,159,867 of the shares and the power to dispose of all of the shares.
(3)Point72 Asset Management, L.P. – filed on February 14, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over all of the shares and shared dispositive power over all of the shares.
(4)Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (DFA) – filed on February 9, 2018; in its role as investment advisor,sub-advisor and/or manager, DFA may be deemed to be beneficial owner of these shares, but it disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares; in this role, shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over 3,382,291 of the shares and the power to dispose of all of the shares.
(5)Van Eck Associates Corporation – filed on February 9, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with sole voting and dispositive power over all of the shares.
(6)Daruma Capital Management, LLC – filed on February 14, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over 1,628,427 of the shares and shared dispositive power over all of the shares.
(7)The Vanguard Group, Inc.—filed on February 9, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over 44,301 of the shares, shared voting power over 3,740 of the shares, sole dispositive power over 2,952,259 of the shares and shared dispositive power over 43,981 of the shares.
(8)DNB Asset Management AS – filed on February 8, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over all of the shares and sole dispositive power over all of the shares.
(9)State Street Corporation – filed on February 14, 2018; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over all of the shares and shared dispositive power over all
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
Percent of
Class (1)
BlackRock, Inc. (2)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
12,123,021 18.1 %
Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC (3)
53 State Street, Suite 3300
Boston, MA 02109
4,752,924 7.1 %
State Street Corporation (4)
1 Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
4,288,262 6.4 %
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (5)
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, PA 19355
4,213,549 6.3 %
Ancora Holdings Group, LLC (6)
6060 Parkland Boulevard, Suite 200
Cleveland, Ohio 44124
4,151,058 6.2 %
(1)Percentage calculated based on 67,113,874 shares, which includes 64,644,430 shares of Common Stock outstanding and 2,469,444 warrants exercisable as of March 13, 2024.
(2)BlackRock, Inc. – filed on January 22, 2024; with respect to itself and certain subsidiaries, shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over 12,052,974 of the shares and with sole dispositive power over 12,123,021 of the shares.
(3)Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC – filed on February 13, 2024; shares are beneficially owned with sole voting power over 4,752,924 of the shares and sole dispositive power over 4,752,924 of the shares.
(4)State Street Corporation – filed on January 25, 2024; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over 4,123,910 of the shares and shared dispositive power over 4,288,262 of the shares.
(5)The Vanguard Group, Inc. – filed on February 13, 2024; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over 51,728 of the shares, sole dispositive power over 4,109,643 of the shares and shared dispositive power over 103,906 of the shares.
(6)Ancora Holdings Group, LLC – filed on February 7, 2024; shares are beneficially owned with shared voting power over 4,151,058 of the shares owned and shared dispositive power over 4,151,058 of the shares owned. Consists of (i) 33,104 shares owned directly by Ancora Merlin, LP; (ii) 349,693 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Merlin Institutional, LP; (iii) 33,595 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Catalyst, LP; (iv) 345,833 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Catalyst Institutional, LP; (v) 115,975 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Bellator Fund, LP; (vi) 458,279 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Impact Fund LP - Series Q; (vii) 1,191,740 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Impact Fund LP Series S; (viii) 1,021,660 shares beneficially owned directly by Ancora Impact Fund SPC Ltd Segregated Portfolio H; (ix) 601,179 shares held in certain separately managed accounts advised by Ancora Alternatives LLC; (x) Mr. Frederick DiSanta as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ancora Holdings Group, LLC may be deemed to beneficially own all 4,151,058 shares. Each person has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to his or its respective reported shares. Each of the persons disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities that he or it does not directly own.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT79

Security Ownership of Management

The following table and notes set forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our Common Stock, as of March 15, 2018,13, 2024, by each director, each nominee for director, each named executive officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group:

NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL
OWNER (1)
SHARES
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED (2)
PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL (3)
GPP UNITS
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED (4)
PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL (4)
  

   Todd Becker (5)

 755,223   1.8 62,556 *   

   Alain Treuer

 320,708   *   

   Wayne Hoovestol (6)

 293,030   *   

   Jeff Briggs (7)

 183,543   *    4,000 *   

   Steve Bleyl

 86,837   *    5,000 *   

   Brian Peterson (8)

 83,645   *   

   Jim Anderson

 73,195   *   

   John Neppl (9)

 65,447   *   

   Gordon Glade (10)

 63,183   *   

   Jerry Peters

 58,768   *    17,993 *   

   Ejnar Knudsen

 29,043   *   

   James Crowley

 23,209   *   

   Gene Edwards

 19,402   *   

   Thomas Manuel

 16,558   *   

   Kenneth Simril

 16,983   *   

   Executive Officers and Directors
as a Group (22 persons) (4) (11)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,442,923  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)Shares
Beneficially
Owned (2)
Percentage
of Total (3)
Todd A. Becker794,423 1.2 
G. Patrich Simpkins Jr.224,433 *
James D. Anderson118,906 *
Leslie van der Meulen51,812 *
Brian Peterson (4)49,857 *
Michelle Mapes48,908 *
Ejnar A. Knudsen III40,913 *
Alain Treuer39,971 *
Grant D. Kadavy32,690 *
James E. Stark32,370 *
Chris G. Osowski27,030 *
James F. Herbert II23,855 *
Martin Salinas Jr.23,535 *
Kimberly Wagner15,642 *
Farha Aslam8,708 *
Executive Officers and Directors as
a Group (15 persons)
1,533,053 2.3 
*Less than 1%.

(1)Except where otherwise indicated, the address of the beneficial owner is deemed to be the same address as the company.
(2)
*    Less than 1%.
(1)Except where otherwise indicated, the address of the beneficial owner is deemed to be the same address as the company.
(2)Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and generally includes holding voting and investment power with respect to the securities. Shares of Common Stock subject to options currently exercisable, or exercisable within 60 days, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the total number of shares beneficially owned by the designated person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage for any other person.
(3)Percentage calculated based on 40,931,456 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 15, 2018.
(4)Includes common units of GPP held directly by executive officers as of March 15, 2018, with percentage calculated based on 15,922,207 common units outstanding. Directors of the company, except for Mr. Becker, are not directors of GPP. Accordingly, holdings of GPP units by our outside directors, if any, are not reported in this table.
(5)Includes options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018, for 100,000 shares.
(6)Includes 17,000 shares owned by Mr. Hoovestol’s wife.
(7)Includes options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018, for 18,750 shares.
(8)Includes options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2018, for 10,000 shares. Also includes 15,000 shares that Mr. Peterson owns jointly with his child.
(9)Includes 26,973 shares held in trust.
(10)Includes 11,988 shares owned by entities in which Mr. Glade has ownership.
(11)Includes options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2017, totaling 128,750 shares for executive officers and directors as a group.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, KPMG LLP was our independent auditor. The following table sets forth aggregate fees billed to us, including fees related to services rendered for GPP, for professional services rendered by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

   2017     2016 

Audit Fees

  $2,474,221     $2,323,506 

Audit-Related Fees

   -      - 

Tax Fees

   552,223      44,113 

All Other Fees

   -      - 

Total

  $3,026,444     $2,367,619 

Audit Fees.  Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of our other filings with the SEC, and other fees that are normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees.  Audit-related fees are for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, other than those previously reported under audit fees. There were no audit-related fees billed by KPMG in 2017 or 2016.

Tax Fees.  Tax fees are for professional services, approved by the Audit Committee in advance, rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees.  All other fees include other products and services thatdesignated person but are not otherwise disclosed. There were nodeemed outstanding for computing the percentage for any other fees billed by KPMG in 2017 or 2016.

Pre-Approvalperson.

(3)Percentage calculated based on 67,113,874 shares, which includes 64,644,430 shares of AuditCommon Stock outstanding andNon-Audit Services

We have adopted policies and procedures forpre-approval 2,469,444 warrants exercisable as of all audit andnon-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor. It is our policyMarch 13, 2024.

(4)Includes 15,000 shares that the Audit Committeepre-approve all audit, tax and othernon-audit services. A proposal for audit ornon-audit services must include a description and purposeMr. Peterson owns jointly with his child.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the services, estimated fees and other terms of the services. To the extent a proposal relates tonon-audit services, a determination that such services qualify as permittednon-audit services and an explanation as to why the provision of such services would not impair the independence of the independent auditor are also required.

All of the services provided by KPMG during 2017 and 2016 were approved in advance by our Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the services performed by our principal accountant is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Availability of Accountants

Representatives from KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. Such representatives are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory(non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, includingas amended, requires our directors and certain officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Compensation DiscussionCompany’s ordinary shares, to file reports of ownership and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure, commonly known as a “say on pay” proposal. At our 2017 annual meeting, our stockholders supported an annual frequency for this advisory vote. As such, the Board has determined that our company will hold this advisory vote on the compensationreports of our named executive officers each year.

As describedchanges in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals and to align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance above established goalsownership with the ultimate objectiveSEC. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of improving stockholder value. Stockholders are encouragedthe copies of Section 16(a) reports and amendments thereto furnished to read the Compensation Discussionus during and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, beginning on page 16, for a more detailed discussion of our executive compensation program, including information aboutwith respect to fiscal year 2017 compensation of our NEOs.

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This say2023 and on pay proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their viewswritten representations from certain reporting persons, all reportable transactions during fiscal year 2023 were reported on the compensation of our named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” adoption of the following resolution at the Annual Meeting.

Required Vote

Approval of the above resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock of the company present in person or represented by proxytimely basis.



80
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and entitled to vote on the matter (assuming a quorum is present). Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, and therefore such broker“non-votes” will have no effect on the outcome.

The say on pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on our company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of our stockholders and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote and take into consideration any concerns raised by stockholders when determining future compensation arrangements.

Recommendation of the Board

The Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” our executive compensation plan set forth in Proposal 2.

Certain Control Persons

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

Our Related Party Policy addresses our company’sCompany’s procedures with respect to the review and approval of “related party transactions” that are required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC regulations. The Related Party Policy provides that any transaction or activity, in which GPIthe Company is involved, with a “related party” (which is defined as an employee’s child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, orsister-in-law, or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of an employee of ours, or any entity that is either wholly or substantially owned or controlled by an employee of ours or any of the foregoing persons and any trust of which an employee of ours is a trustee or beneficiary) shall be subject to review by our general counselAudit Committee as well as our Chief Legal and Administration Officer so that appropriate measures can be put into place to avoid either an actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest. Any waivers of this conflict of interest policy must be in writing and bepre-approved by our general counsel.

Audit Committee.

In determining whether a related party transaction will be approved or ratified, the Audit Committee may consider factors such as (a) the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction; (b) the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; (c) whether the terms are competitive with terms generally available in similar transactions with persons that are not related parties; (d) the benefit to us; and (e) the aggregate value of the transaction.

Related Party Transactions

Commercial Contracts

Three subsidiaries

There were no related party transactions in 2023.


81
Other Matters
Additional Meeting Information
2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Place (Online Meeting):www.meetnow.global/MNVQDLQ
Record Date: March 13, 2024
Voting Information
Who is Eligible to Vote
You are entitled to vote at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders if you were a shareholder of record as of the Record Date, which has been fixed as of close of business on March 13, 2024. On the Record Date, there were 64,644,430 shares of our Company’s Common Stock outstanding and eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
The presence, in person (online) or by properly executed proxy, at the Annual Meeting of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum. Proxies that are marked to “withhold authority” with respect to the election of directors and proxies that are marked "abstain" or for which no instructions are given will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
Electronic Access to Proxy Materials
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we are making this Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report available to shareholders electronically via the Internet. On or around March 28, 2024, we mailed the Notice, which provides information regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, to our shareholders of record.
Shareholders will be able to access this Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report on the website referred to in the Notice or request printed copies of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials on the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. The website on which you will be able to view our proxy materials also allows you to choose to receive future proxy materials electronically by email, which would save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you. If you choose to receive future proxy statements by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by email remains in effect until you terminate it.
HOW YOU CAN ACCESS THE PROXY MATERIALS ONLINE
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting
to Be Held on May 7, 2024.

The Notice, the Proxy and our 2023 Annual Report may be accessed at
www.edocumentview.com/GPRE.


82
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations
ProposalsBoard Vote
Recommendation
For Further
Details
1.The election of six directors to serve a one-year term that expire at the 2025 annual meeting (“Proposal 1”)
Vote FOR
uPage 14
2.The ratification of the selection of the company’s independent registered public accountants for 2024 (“Proposal 2”)
Vote FOR
uPage 36
3.The cast of an advisory vote to approve executive compensation (“Proposal 3”)
Vote FOR
uPage 42
Proxy Voting and Revocability of Proxies
Common Stock, represented by the proxies received pursuant to this solicitation and not timely revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated in properly submitted proxies. If no instructions are given, such shares will be voted as recommended by the Board. If any other matters are properly presented to the Annual Meeting for action, the person(s) named in the enclosed form(s) of proxy and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. Broker non-votes and abstentions are not treated as votes cast for any of the matters to be voted on at the meeting.
A holder of Common Stock who has submitted a proxy may revoke it prior to its exercise by providing written notice of revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Corporate Secretary of the company have executed separate financing agreements for equipment with Amur Equipment Finance. Gordon Glade, a memberat any time before the closing of the company’s Boardpolls at the meeting, or by voting online at the meeting. Any written notice revoking a proxy should be sent to: Green Plains Inc., Attention: Michelle S. Mapes, Corporate Secretary, 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. Attendance and voting online at the Annual Meeting does not itself revoke a proxy; however, any shareholder who attends the Annual Meeting online may revoke a previously submitted proxy by voting online.
Computershare Trust Company, N.A. is the transfer agent and registrar for our Common Stock. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, with respect to those shares, you are considered the shareholder of Directors, isrecord, or a registered shareholder, and these materials were sent to you directly by us. If you are a shareholder of Amur Equipment Finance.record, you may vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting online.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and that organization should have forwarded these materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or nominee holding your shares how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Please refer to the information forwarded by your broker or bank for instructions on how to direct their vote. However, since you are not a shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares at the online Annual Meeting unless you provide a legal proxy from the shareholder of record.
If you are a registered shareholder, there are three ways to vote:
Going to the Internet website indicated on the Proxy Card or voting instruction card and following the instructions provided (you will need the control number that is included in the Notice);
Calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on the Proxy Card or voting instruction card (you will need the control number that is included in the Notice); or
Signing, dating and returning the Proxy Card if you request to receive your proxy materials by mail.
Your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate your voting preferences, the appointed proxies will vote your shares “For” all nominees in Proposal 1 and “For” Proposals 2 and 3.


OTHER MATTERS83
Broker Non-Votes
Broker non-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks holding shares on behalf of the beneficial owners, are prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions at least ten days before the Annual Meeting date. If no instructions are given within that time frame, the nominees may vote those shares on matters deemed “routine” by the New York Stock Exchange. On non-routine matters, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting in so-called “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes are not counted for the purposes of determining the number of shares present in person (online) or represented by proxy on any voting matter. All proposals are considered non-routine, except for Proposal 2.
Expenses and Methods of Solicitation
We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. In March 2014, a subsidiaryaddition to the use of the mail and internet, proxies may be solicited personally, or by telephone or other means of communications, by directors, officers and employees of the company entered into $1.4 million of new equipment financing agreements with Amur Equipment Finance. Balances of $0.6 million and $0.8 millionits subsidiaries who will not receive additional compensation therefor. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and nominees for reasonable expenses incurred related to these financing arrangements were included in debtforwarding proxy solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares held by such banks, brokerage firms and nominees.
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a plurality of all votes cast at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Payments, including principal and interest, totaled $0.3 million for eachthe Annual Meeting by the holders of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.Common Stock, assuming a quorum is present, is required to elect each director. The weighted average interest ratesix persons receiving the greatest number of votes at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as directors. Since only affirmative votes count for this purpose, broker non-votes or votes withheld will not affect the financing agreements with Amur Equipment Finance was 6.8%.

Aircraft Leases

Effective January 1, 2015, the company entered into two agreements with an entity controlled by Wayne Hoovestol for the lease of two aircrafts. Mr. Hoovestol is Chairmanoutcome of the company’s Boardvoting on Proposal 1. Abstentions do not count as votes cast "for" or "against" Proposal 2 and 3. If you do not provide voting instructions to your brokerage firm or similar person holding your shares, they will be permitted to vote your shares on Proposal 2 at their discretion. Broker non-votes, if any, do not count as votes cast "for" or "against" Proposal 3.

List of Directors. Shareholders Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting
The company agreednames of shareholders of record entitled to pay $9,766 per monthvote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder for a purpose germane to the combined use ofmeeting at the Annual Meeting via the live webcast platform and on and after April 1, 2024 up to 125the meeting between the hours per yearof 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Central Daylight Time at our principal executive offices at 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, NE 68106, and may be viewed by contacting our corporate secretary.
Results of the aircrafts. Flight timeMeeting
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Voting results will be published in excess of 125 hours per yeara Current Report on Form 8-K that we will incur additional hourly charges. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, payments related to these leases totaled $182 thousand, $190 thousand and $270 thousand, respectively. The company had $2 thousand in outstanding payables related to these agreements at December 31, 2017, and no outstanding payable related to these agreements at December 31, 2016.

Other Transactions

Pursuant to an operational services and secondment agreement, we are reimbursed by GPP for certain compensation of our employees, including executive officers, who serve in management, maintenance and operational functions in support of its operations. GPP also has variousfee-based commercial agreements with our subsidiary, Green Plains Trade Group LLC, including a storage and throughput agreement, a rail transportation services agreement, a trucking transportation agreement and various terminal services agreements for our fuel terminal facilities. See the Related Party Transaction footnote in our10-K for a full description of all the related party transactions.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and any persons who own more than ten percent of our Common Stock to file with the SEC various reports as to ownership ofwithin four business days after the Common Stock. These persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To our knowledge, based solelyAnnual Meeting.

Annual Report on our review of the copies of the reports furnished to us, the aforesaid Section 16(a) filing requirements were met on a timely basis during fiscal 2017, except for a late filing for James Crowley on May 30, 2017 pertaining to the disposal of shares on May 25, 2017.

Form 10-K

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The company has an Audit Committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Board of Directors has designated Mr. James Crowley as its Audit Committee financial expert as defined in Rule 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K. Mr. Crowley also serves as the Audit Committee Chairman.

Management is responsible for the company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the company’s internal control over financial reporting and an independent audit of the company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and to issue reports thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, which has primary responsibility for the financial statements. KPMG, the company’s independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2017, is responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the company’s audited consolidated financial statements are presented fairly in all material respects in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee met with KPMG and Company management to discuss the company’s financial reports. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standard No. 61 (Communication with Audit Committees), as may be modified or supplemented. Additionally, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required to be delivered to them under the applicable requirements of the Public Company Oversight Board regarding communications concerning independence, and the Audit Committee considered whether KPMG maintained its independence during the year ended December 31, 2017. Based on these discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the company’s report on Form10-K for the year ended on December 31, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

James Crowley, Chairman

Jim Anderson

Gene Edwards

Gordon Glade

Ejnar Knudsen

OTHER MATTERS

Annual Report

This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report, which includes financial and other information about our activities but is not to be deemed a part of the proxy soliciting material, are available aton our website atwww..gpreinc.comwww.gpreinc.com. Additionally, you may access our Proxy Statement atwww..edocumentview.com/www.envisionreports.com/GPRE. Our annual reports on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge on our website atwww..gpreinc.comwww.gpreinc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we file or furnish such information electronically with the SEC. A copy of theour annual report on Form10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2023, and the exhibits filed with our annual report on Form10-K will be mailed to shareholders without charge upon written request to Green Plains Inc., Attention: Michelle S. Mapes, Corporate Secretary, 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. Such requests must include a good faith representation that the requesting party was either a holder of record or beneficial owner of our Common Stock on March 15, 2018. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report we file or furnish to the SEC.



84
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
Shareholder Proposals

Pursuant to Rule14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, if we do not receive advance notice of a shareholder proposal to be raised at our next Annual Meeting of shareholders in accordance with the requirements of our bylaws, the proxies solicited by us may confer discretionary voting authority to vote proxies on the shareholder proposal without any discussion of the matter in the Proxy Statement.

Our bylaws provide that timely written notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the Corporate Secretary of the company at the principal executive offices of the company not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to theone-year anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting (which for a May 9, 20187, 2024 meeting date is on or before February 8, 20196, 2025 and on or after January 9, 2019)7, 2025). OnlyExcept as otherwise stated in this Proxy Statement, only proposals properly delivered in this time frame may be brought before the meeting. As to each matter a shareholder proposes to bring before the 20192025 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholder’s notice must set forth: (i) the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on our books, and of such beneficial owner; (ii) the class and number of shares of our Common Stock which are held of record or are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholder and any derivative instrument and by any other shareholders known by such shareholder to be supporting such proposal; (iii) whether and the extent to which any hedging or other transaction or series of transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of such shareholder, beneficial owner or nominee with respect to any of our securities, and a description of any other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any short position or any borrowing or lending of shares), the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, or to manage the risk or benefit from share price changes for, or to increase or decrease the voting power of, such shareholder, any beneficial owner or nominee with respect to any of our securities; (iv) any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which the shareholder, beneficial owner or nominee has a right to vote any shares of any of our securities; (v) any rights to dividends on the shares of us beneficially owned by the shareholder or beneficial owner that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the company; (vi) any performance-related fees (other than asset-based fees) that the shareholder, a beneficial owner or the nominee is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of our shares or derivative instruments, if any, as of the date of such notice;notice, including without limitation, any such interests held by members of the shareholder's or beneficial owner's immediate family sharing in the same household; (vii) any material interest of the shareholder or beneficial owner in such business; and (viii) a statement whether such shareholder or any beneficial owner will deliver a Proxy Statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of our voting shares required under applicable law to carry the proposal or nomination. In addition, to be in proper written form, a shareholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary of the company must be supplemented not later than 10 days following the record date for notice of the meeting to disclose the information contained in clauses (ii) through (vi) above as of the record date for notice of the meeting. Our bylaws also provide that the Chairman of an Annual Meetingannual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine and declare at any meeting of the shareholders that business was not properly brought before the meeting and, if he should so determine, declare that such business shall not be transacted.

In addition the foregoing, a shareholder who wishes to nominate a director for election or reelection,re-election, must also include the following in its notice to us as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelectionre-election as a director: (i) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for elections of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to be named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (ii) a description of all arrangements or understandings during the past three years between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the shareholder;shareholder and any other material relationships between the shareholder and each nominee and his/her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith; (iii) a written statement executed by the nominee acknowledging that as a director, the nominee will owe a fiduciary duty under Iowa law with respect to us and our shareholders; (iv) a fully completed Director’s Questionnaire on the form supplied by us upon written request from the shareholder, executed by the nominee; (v) a written statement executed by the nominee acknowledging in such person's individual capacity and (v)on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, such person's intention to serve a full-term if elected as a director; and (vi) a written representation and agreement (in the form provided by the secretaryCorporate Secretary upon written request) that such person (A) is not and will not become a party to (1) any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how such person, if elected as a director of ours, will act or vote on any issue or question or voting commitment,("Voting commitment"), that has not been disclosed to us or (2) any voting commitmentVoting Commitment that could limit or interfere with such person’s ability to comply, if elected as a director of ours, with such person’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action


OTHER MATTERS85
as a director that has not been disclosed therein, and (C) in such person’s individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as a director of ours, and will comply with all applicable publicly disclosed corporate guidance, conflict orof interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines of Green Plains.

Our Bylaws also permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning 3% or more of our common stock continuously for a period of at least three years, to nominate for election to our Board and have such director nominations included in our proxy materials, a number of director candidates equal to the greater of (i) two individuals or (ii) 20% of our Board, provided that the shareholder(s) and the nominee(s) satisfy certain requirements specified in the Bylaws. Under these procedures, notice must be received by our corporate secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 120 calendar days, and not more than 150 calendar days, before the first anniversary of the date that our Proxy Statement was released to shareholders in connection with our 2024 annual meeting of shareholders (i.e., notice must be received no earlier than October 29, 2024 and no later than November 28, 2024). In accordance with our Bylaws, the shareholder notice must contain certain information about the candidate the shareholder(s) desires to nominate for election as a director, the shareholder(s) giving the notice and the beneficial owner(s), if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made.

Any shareholder who desires to have a proposal included in the proxy soliciting material relating to our 2019 Annual Meeting2025 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act and must send a signed proposal to the Corporate Secretary at 1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68106. This proposal must be received no later than November 29, 2018,28, 2024, to be considered for inclusion in the Proxy Statement for the 20192025 annual meeting of shareholders.
To comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees for the 2025 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

Shareholders, other than the nominees of the Company’s Board of Directors, must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act, including providing a statement that such shareholder intends to solicit the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of shares of the Company entitled to vote on the election of directors in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees.

Discretionary Authority

At the time of mailing of this Proxy Statement, the Board was not aware of any other matters that might be presented at the meeting. If any matter not described in this Proxy Statement should properly be presented, the person named on the accompanying Proxy Card will vote such proxy in accordance with histheir judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Image_190.jpg
Michelle Mapes


Corporate Secretary


March 29, 2018

28, 2024

LOGO

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION Electronic Voting Instructions Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted



86
GREEN PLAINS INC.
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
COMMONLY USED DEFINED TERMS
Company and Regulatory Defined Terms:
Green Plains; the companyGreen Plains Inc.
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
NASDAQThe Nasdaq Global Market
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
Other Defined Terms:
Annual MeetingThe 2024 Annual Meeting of shareholders of Green Plains Inc. and any adjournment or postponement thereof
ASC 718
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation
BoardBoard of Directors of Green Plains Inc.
CCSCarbon Capture and Sequestration
Common StockGreen Plains Inc. Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
EBITDAEarnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization which is a non-GAAP measure. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 for a detailed definition of this term and a reconciliation to GAAP net loss
ESGEnvironmental, social and corporate governance
GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GICSGlobal Industry Classification Standard
Internal Revenue CodeInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
LTIPLong-term incentive program
MBOManagement by Objectives
MSC™Maximized Stillage Co-products™ produced using process technology developed by Fluid Quip Technologies
NEONamed executive officer
NoticeImportant notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting
PSUPerformance Share Unit
Record DateThe record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting
RSARestricted Stock Award
SCTSummary of Compensation Total
STIPShort-term cash incentive program
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
TSRTotal Shareholder Return
U.S.United States



Helpful Resources
Annual Meeting

Proxy & supplemental materialswww.envisionreports.com/GPRE
Online voting for registered holderswww.envisionreports.com/GPRE
Webcastwww.meetnow.global/MNVQDLQ
Electronic delivery of future proxy materialswww.envisionreports.com/GPRE

Corporate Governance

Leadershiphttps://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance/leadership
Board of directorshttps://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors
Committee compositionhttps://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance/committee-composition
Contacting the Boardhttps://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance/contact-the-board
Governance documentshttps://investor.gpreinc.com/corporate-governance

Financial Reporting

Annual reporthttps://investor.gpreinc.com/financials-filings
Financial filingshttps://investor.gpreinc.com/financials-filings
Stock informationhttps://investor.gpreinc.com/stock-information

Other Information

Corporate websitehttps://gpreinc.com/
Investor relationshttps://investor.gpreinc.com/
Sustainabilityhttps://gpreinc.com/who-we-are/sustainability/
Press releaseshttps://investor.gpreinc.com/press-releases
The information on our website is not incorporated by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 9, 2018. Vote by Internet    Go to www.envisionreports.com/GPRE    Or scan the QR code with your smartphone    Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Vote by telephone    Call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone    Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shownreference in X this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1 and a vote FOR Proposal 2. 1. To elect four directors to serve three-year terms that expire at the 2021 annual meeting: + For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 01—Todd Becker 02—Thomas Manuel 03—Brian Peterson 04—Alain Treuer For Against Abstain 2. To cast an advisory vote to approve the Company’s 3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the executive compensation; Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. BNon-Voting Items Change of Address — please print new address below. C Authorized Signatures — this section must be completed for your vote to be counted — date and sign below. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. 1UP X + 02SRPB

Statement.



LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Shareholder Meeting to be held on May 9, 2018: The Notice, Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.envisionreports.com/GPRE qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q Proxy — Green Plains Inc. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held on May 9, 2018 Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — May 9, 2018 Todd Becker and Michelle Mapes, with the power to appoint his or her substitute, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Green Plains Inc. to be held on May 9, 2018 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxy will have authority to vote FOR all nominees listed in Proposal 1 and vote FOR Proposal 2. In his discretion, the Proxy is authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)


01_429139-3_cover_BC.jpg



3.jpg



4.jpg